Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 565-574

  Dromain, Clarisse ^a   Thibault, Fabienne ^b   Muller, Serge ^c   Rimareix, Françoise ^a   Delaloge, Suzette ^a   Tardivon, Anne ^b   Balleyguier, Corinne ^a  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c GE HEALTHCARE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOBITRIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DUAL ENERGY CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRECANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DUAL-ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79751535823     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1944-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. SW Duffy 2006 Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: further confirmation with external data Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 45 51 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0880 (Pubitemid 44877047)
2. L Tabar MF Yen B Vitak, et al. 2003 Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20 years follow-up before and after introduction of screening Lancet 361 1405 1410 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1 12727392 (Pubitemid 36515039)
3. SJ Otto J Fracheboud CW Looman, et al. 2003 Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast cancer mortality: a systematic review Lancet 361 411 417 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13132-7 (Pubitemid 36515040)
4. RD Rosenberg WC Hunt MR Williamson, et al. 1998 Effect of age, breast density, ethnicity and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183, 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque New Mexico Radiol 209 511 518 1:STN:280: DyaK1M%2FisVOisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28503121)
5. TM Kolb J Lichy JH Newhouse 2002 Comparison of the performance of screening mammography physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations Radiology 255 165 175 10.1148/radiol.2251011667
6. TM Kolb J Lichy JH Newhouse 1998 Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology 207 191 199 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ptFeqsA%3D%3D 9530316
7. C Hagay P Cherel CE de Maulmont, et al. 1996 Contrast-enhanced CT: value for diagnosing local breast cancer recurrence after conservative treatment Radiology 200 631 638 1:STN:280:DyaK28zkslyhug%3D%3D 8756908 (Pubitemid 26282257)
8. CH Chang DE Nesbit DR Fischer, et al. 1982 Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner AJR Am J Roentgenol 138 553 558 1:STN:280:DyaL387ls1Oisw%3D%3D 6978009 (Pubitemid 12170484)
9. NHGM Peters IHM Borel Rinkes NPA Zuithof, et al. 2008 Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions Radiology 246 1 116 124 10.1148/radiol.2461061298 18024435 (Pubitemid 350305034)
10. RA Jong MJ Yaffe M Skarpathiotakis, et al. 2003 Contrast enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience Radiology 228 842 850 10.1148/radiol.2283020961 12881585 (Pubitemid 37025497)
11. C Dromain C Balleyguier S Muller, et al. 2006 Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 528 537 10.2214/AJR.05.1944
12. F Diekmann C Marx R Jong, et al. 2007 Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography as an adjunct to mammography. Abstract Eur Radiol 17 174 10.1007/s00330-007-0715-x (Pubitemid 350142333)
13. JM Lewin PK Isaacs V Vance, et al. 2003 Dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography: feasibility Radiology 229 261 268 10.1148/radiol. 2291021276 12888621 (Pubitemid 37152134)
14. M Skarpathiotakis MJ Yaffe AK Bloomquist, et al. 2002 Development of contrast digital mammography Med Phys 29 2419 2426 10.1118/1.1510128 12408316 (Pubitemid 35204450)
15. S Puong X Bouchevreau F Patoureaux, et al. 2007 Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue cancelling Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 6510 65102H
16. Wu Xizeng GT Barnes DM Tucker 1991 Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography Radiology 179 144 148
17. Wu Xizeng EL Gingold GT Barnes, et al. 1994 Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium molybdenum target-rhodium filter Radiology 193 83 898
18. JM Boone 2002 Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data Med Phys 29 869 875 10.1118/1.1472499 12033583 (Pubitemid 34525916)
19. SG Orel MD Schnall CM Powell MG Hochman LJ Solin BL Fowble MH Torosian EF Rosato 1995 Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy Radiology 196 115 122 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzgsVSisw%3D%3D 7784554
20. WA Berg L Gutierrez MS NessAiver, et al. 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, ultrasound, and MR imaging in pre-operative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830 849 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 15486214
21. CD Lehman C Gatsonis CK Kuhl, et al. 2007 ACRIN trial 6667 investigators group. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 1295 1303 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXjsFGht70%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa065447 17392300 (Pubitemid 46513295)
22. AB Hollingsworth RG Stough CA O'Dell, et al. 2008 Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging Am J Surg 196 389 397 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.009 18436185