Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 112-121

  Diekmann, Felix ^a   Freyer, Martin ^a   Diekmann, Susanne ^a   Fallenberg, Eva M ^a   Fischer, Thomas ^a   Bick, Ulrich ^a   Pöllinger, Alexander ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced digital mammography advanced applications; Cranio caudal projection plane; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 79954734137     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, and E. Hendrick Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 17 2005 1773 1783 (Pubitemid 41549889)
2. E.D. Pisano, R.E. Hendrick, and M.J. Yaffe Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST Radiology 246 2 2008 376 383
3. C. Kuhl The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 2 2007 356 378 (Pubitemid 47080868)
4. C.K. Kuhl Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications Radiology 244 3 2007 672 691 (Pubitemid 47292079)
5. F. Sardanelli, A. Fausto, L. Menicagli, and A. Esseridou Breast vascular mapping obtained with contrast-enhanced MR imaging: implications for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification Eur Radiol 17 Suppl. 6 2007 F48 51
6. F. Sardanelli, and F. Podo Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection? Eur Radiol 17 4 2007 873 887 (Pubitemid 46766869)
7. E.A. Hauth, H. Jaeger, and S. Maderwald Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography Eur Radiol 16 12 2006 2834 2841 (Pubitemid 44823937)
8. U. Bick, and F. Diekmann Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol 17 8 2007 1931 1942 (Pubitemid 47097450)
9. F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, F. Jeunehomme, S. Muller, B. Hamm, and U. Bick Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement Invest Radiol 40 7 2005 397 404 (Pubitemid 40863782)
10. C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, and S. Muller Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography Am J Roentgenol 187 5 2006 W528 W537
11. R.A. Jong, M.J. Yaffe, and M. Skarpathiotakis Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience Radiology 228 3 2003 842 850 (Pubitemid 37025497)
12. J.M. Lewin, P.K. Isaacs, V. Vance, and F.J. Larke Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility Radiology 229 1 2003 261 268 (Pubitemid 37152134)
13. M. Skarpathiotakis, M.J. Yaffe, and A.K. Bloomquist Development of contrast digital mammography Med Phys 29 10 2002 2419 2426 (Pubitemid 35204450)
14. C.F. Marx, M. Mirijam, L. Serge, K. Benali, A. Malich, and W. Kaiser Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM): phantom experiment and first clinical results Proc SPIE 4682 2002 174 181 (Pubitemid 35237111)
15. J. Chopier, M. Gibeault, C. Salem, C. Marsault, and I. Thomassin Naggara How to measure breast density? J Radiol 89 9 Pt 2 2008 1151 1155
16. C.K. Kuhl, S. Schrading, and H.B. Bieling MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet 370 9586 2007 485 492 (Pubitemid 47214635)
17. J. Veltman, R. Mann, and T. Kok Breast tumor characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers on MRI Eur Radiol 18 5 2008 931 938
18. F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, and M. Taupitz Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography - initial experience Rofo 175 3 2003 342 345 (Pubitemid 36395957)
19. F. Diekmann, A. Sommer, and R. Lawaczeck Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents Invest Radiol 42 5 2007 319 325 (Pubitemid 46558092)
20. D. Gur, A.I. Bandos, and C.S. Cohen The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations Radiology 249 1 2008 47 53
21. P. Skaane, and L. Niklason Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a proper measurement for performance in breast cancer screening? Am J Roentgenol 186 2 2006 579 580 [author reply 80] (Pubitemid 46100336)
22. F. Sardanelli, A. Fausto, A. Esseridou, G. Di Leo, and M.A. Kirchin Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance Invest Radiol 43 4 2008 236 242 (Pubitemid 351416767)
23. T. Schlossbauer, G. Leinsinger, and A. Wismuller Classification of small contrast enhancing breast lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of morphological criteria and dynamic analysis based on unsupervised vector-quantization Invest Radiol 43 1 2008 56 64
24. R. Lawaczeck, V. Arkadiev, F. Diekmann, and M. Krumrey Monochromatic X-rays in digital mammography Invest Radiol 40 1 2005 33 39 (Pubitemid 40029892)
25. R. Lawaczeck, F. Diekmann, and S. Diekmann New contrast media designed for X-ray energy subtraction imaging in digital mammography Invest Radiol 38 9 2003 602 608 (Pubitemid 37046506)
26. S.C. Chen, A.K. Carton, M. Albert, E.F. Conant, M.D. Schnall, and A.D. Maidment Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis Acad Radiol 14 2 2007 229 238 (Pubitemid 46108599)
27. F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, and M. Beljavskaja Preoperative MRT of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma Rofo 176 4 2004 544 549 (Pubitemid 38724248)
28. F. Diekmann, and U. Bick Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography Eur Radiol 17 12 2007 3086 3092 (Pubitemid 350142333)