The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 415-422

  Mann, R M ^a   Loo, C E ^b   Wobbes, T ^a   Bult, P ^a   Barentsz, J O ^a   Gilhuijs, K G A ^b   Boetes, C ^a,c,d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Breast MRI; Invasive lobular carcinoma; Mastectomy; Re excision rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NETHERLANDS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 74849140624     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0616-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. M Keskek M Kothari B Ardehali N Betambeau N Nasiri GP Gui 2004 Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 30 10 1058 1064 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.07.019 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crltVOmtQ%3D%3D 15522551 (Pubitemid 40267809)
2. MJ O'Sullivan T Li G Freedman M Morrow 2007 The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol 14 11 3133 3140 10.1245/s10434-007-9523-4 17653798 (Pubitemid 47594283)
3. MC Smitt K Horst 2007 Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 14 3 1040 1044 10.1245/s10434-006-9308-1 17203329
4. N van den Broek MJ van der Sangen LV van de Poll-Franse MW van Beek GA Nieuwenhuijzen AC Voogd 2007 Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 105 1 63 68 10.1007/s10549-006-9431-5 17115109 (Pubitemid 47282747)
5. JF Waljee ES Hu LA Newman AK Alderman 2008 Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer Ann Surg Oncol 15 5 1297 1303 10.1245/s10434-007-9777-x 18259820
6. MF Dillon AD Hill FJ Fleming A O'Doherty CM Quinn EW McDermott N O'Higgins 2006 Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma Am J Surg 191 2 201 205 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.041 16442946 (Pubitemid 43151267)
7. M Hussien TF Lioe J Finnegan RA Spence 2003 Surgical treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast Breast 12 1 23 35 10.1016/S0960- 9776(02)00182-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srnvVyltQ%3D%3D 14659352 (Pubitemid 36395483)
8. JG Molland M Donnellan NC Janu HL Carmalt CW Kennedy DJ Gillett 2004 Infiltrating lobular carcinoma-a comparison of diagnosis, management and outcome with infiltrating duct carcinoma Breast 13 5 389 396 10.1016/j.breast.2004.03. 004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvosFOisQ%3D%3D 15454194 (Pubitemid 39549788)
9. M Morrow K Keeney D Scholtens J Wei J Steel SA Khan 2006 Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology Cancer 106 12 2563 2568 10.1002/cncr.21921 16683225 (Pubitemid 43911821)
10. TJ Yeatman AB Cantor TJ Smith SK Smith DS Reintgen MS Miller NN Ku PA Baekey CE Cox 1995 Tumor biology of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Implications for management Ann Surg 222 4 549 559 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FisFWhtw%3D%3D 7574934
11. T Caramella C Chapellier F Ettore I Raoust E Chamorey C Balu-Maestro 2007 Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases: comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology Clin Imaging 31 3 155 161 10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.01.001 17449375 (Pubitemid 46601797)
12. J Kepple R Layeeque VS Klimberg S Harms E Siegel S Korourian F Gusmano RS Henry-Tillman 2005 Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic size of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast Am J Surg 190 4 623 627 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.028 16164936 (Pubitemid 41306091)
13. PJ Kneeshaw LW Turnbull A Smith PJ Drew 2003 Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 29 1 32 37 10.1053/ejso.2002.1391 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FltVSiug%3D%3D 12559074 (Pubitemid 36181775)
14. RM Mann J Veltman JO Barentsz T Wobbes JG Blickman C Boetes 2008 The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast Eur J Surg Oncol 34 2 135 142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FltVejsg%3D%3D 17574805
15. A Qayyum RL Birdwell BL Daniel KW Nowels SS Jeffrey TA Agoston RJ Herfkens 2002 MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 5 1227 1232 11959737
16. GN Rodenko SE Harms JM Pruneda RS Farrell Jr WP Evans DS Copit PA Krakos DP Flamig 1996 MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 6 1415 1419 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7hsFWlug%3D%3D 8956569
17. K Schelfout M Van Goethem E Kersschot I Verslegers I Biltjes P Leyman C Colpaert L Thienpont HJ Van Den JP Gillardin W Tjalma P Buytaert SA De 2004 Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer Eur Radiol 14 7 1209 1216 10.1007/s00330-004-2275-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czhvVKnug%3D%3D 15024602
18. SP Weinstein SG Orel R Heller C Reynolds B Czerniecki LJ Solin M Schnall 2001 MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 2 399 406 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3isVWqsA%3D%3D 11159081
19. I Bedrosian R Mick SG Orel M Schnall C Reynolds FR Spitz LS Callans GP Buzby EF Rosato DL Fraker BJ Czerniecki 2003 Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 98 3 468 473 10.1002/cncr.11490 12879462 (Pubitemid 36885985)
20. DN Fabre P Boulet X Prat L Charra A Lesnik P Taourel 2005 Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: diagnosis and staging J Radiol 86 9 Pt 1 1027 1034
21. K Munot B Dall R Achuthan G Parkin S Lane K Horgan 2002 Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast Br J Surg 89 10 1296 1301 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02208.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vos1Gjsg%3D%3D 12296901 (Pubitemid 36002550)
22. ML Quan L Sclafani AS Heerdt JV Fey EA Morris PI Borgen 2003 Magnetic resonance imaging detects unsuspected disease in patients with invasive lobular cancer Ann Surg Oncol 10 9 1048 1053 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.016 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srhvVyjtQ%3D%3D 14597443 (Pubitemid 40486828)
23. RM Mann YL Hoogeveen JG Blickman C Boetes 2008 MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature Breast Cancer Res Treat 107 1 1 14 10.1007/s10549-007-9528-5 18043894 (Pubitemid 350179588)
24. Jobsen JJ, Riemersma S, van der Palen J, Ong F, Jonkman A, Struikmans H (2009) The impact of margin status in breast-conserving therapy for lobular carcinoma is age related. Eur J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.06.003
25. A Luini J Rososchansky G Gatti S Zurrida P Caldarella G Viale SG Rosali dos A Frasson 2009 The surgical margin status after breast-conserving surgery: discussion of an open issue Breast Cancer Res Treat 113 2 397 402 10.1007/s10549-008-9929-0 18386174
26. C Kuhl W Kuhn M Braun H Schild 2007 Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast 16 Suppl 2 S34 S44 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014 17959382 (Pubitemid 350028553)
27. M Morrow G Freedman 2006 A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 3 363 378 10.1016/j.mric.2006.07.006 17098177 vi (Pubitemid 46070170)
28. M Morrow 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: one step forward, two steps back? JAMA 292 22 2779 2780 10.1001/jama.292.22.2779 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVGku7rK 15585740 (Pubitemid 39628259)
29. National Breast Cancer Organization Netherlands (2008) Guideline for treatment of patients with breast cancer. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidszorg CBO. Available via http://www.oncoline.nl
30. EA Morris 2006 Breast MR imaging lexicon updated Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 3 293 303 10.1016/j.mric.2006.07.001 17098172 (Pubitemid 46053825)
31. J Veltman C Boetes T Wobbes JG Blickman JO Barentsz 2005 Magnetic resonance-guided biopsies and localizations of the breast: initial experiences using an open breast coil and compatible intervention device Invest Radiol 40 6 379 384 10.1097/01.rli.0000163672.90247.70 15905725 (Pubitemid 40734567)
32. F Tresserra J Feu PJ Grases B Navarro X Alegret A Fernandez-Cid 1999 Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation J Clin Ultrasound 27 9 485 491 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199911/12)27:9<485::AID- JCU1>3.0.CO;2-C 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlsVyqtA%3D%3D 10525209 (Pubitemid 29519435)
33. J Veltman C Boetes L van Die P Bult JG Blickman JO Barentsz 2006 Mammographic detection and staging of invasive lobular carcinoma Clin Imaging 30 2 94 98 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.09.021 16500539 (Pubitemid 43267623)
34. DO Watermann C Tempfer LA Hefler C Parat E Stickeler 2005 Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer Ultrasound Med Biol 31 2 167 174 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2004.11.005 15708454 (Pubitemid 40228770)
35. G Arpino VJ Bardou GM Clark RM Elledge 2004 Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome Breast Cancer Res 6 3 R149 R156 10.1186/bcr767 15084238
36. SK Al-Ghazal RW Blamey J Stewart AA Morgan 1999 The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation Eur J Surg Oncol 25 6 566 570 10.1053/ejso.1999.0707 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fis1WjsQ%3D%3D 10556000
37. DE Wazer T Dipetrillo R Schmidt-Ullrich L Weld TJ Smith DJ Marchant NJ Robert 1992 Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 10 3 356 363 1:STN:280:DyaK387ls1ylsw%3D%3D 1445509
38. KE Pengel CE Loo HJ Teertstra SH Muller J Wesseling JL Peterse H Bartelink EJ Rutgers KG Gilhuijs 2009 The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study Breast Cancer Res Treat 116 1 161 169 10.1007/s10549-008-0182-3 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1MvhtVymtw%3D%3D 18807269
39. D Aziz E Rawlinson SA Narod P Sun HL Lickley DR McCready CM Holloway 2006 The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer Breast J 12 4 331 337 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00271.x 16848842 (Pubitemid 43989977)
40. TS Menes PI Tartter I Bleiweiss JH Godbold A Estabrook SR Smith 2005 The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients Ann Surg Oncol 12 11 881 885 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021 16195834 (Pubitemid 41504220)
41. U Fischer O Zachariae F Baum D von Heyden M Funke T Liersch 2004 The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer Eur Radiol 14 10 1725 1731 10.1007/s00330-004-2351-z 15248080 (Pubitemid 39386618)
42. LJ Solin SG Orel WT Hwang EE Harris MD Schnall 2008 Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ J Clin Oncol 26 3 386 391 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5448 18202414 (Pubitemid 351171689)
43. PM Poortmans L Collette H Bartelink H Struikmans WF Van den Bogaert A Fourquet JJ Jager W Hoogenraad RP Muller JB Dubois M Bolla HM Van Der CC Warlam-Rodenhuis M Pierart JC Horiot 2008 The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial Cancer Radiother 12 6-7 565 570 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1cjptF2mtw%3D%3D 18760649
44. ACR Guidelines and Standards Committee, Basset LW, Berg WA, Birdwell RL, et al (2008) ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. Available via http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality-safety/guidelines/breast/ mri-breast.aspx
45. RM Mann CK Kuhl K Kinkel C Boetes 2008 Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging Eur Radiol 18 7 1307 1318 10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czovFalsg%3D%3D 18389253
46. C Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 2 356 378 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 17641361 (Pubitemid 47080868)
47. LW Turnbull 2009 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer NMR Biomed 22 1 28 39 10.1002/nbm.1273 18654999