MR Imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 180, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 333-341

  Liberman, Laura ^a   Morris, Elizabeth A ^a   Kim, Cathleen M ^a   Kaplan, Jennifer B ^a   Abramson, Andrea F ^a   Menell, Jennifer H ^a   Van Zee, Kimberly J ^a   Dershaw, D David ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INFILTRATION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0037307120     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800333     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (Y1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up. Surgery 1989;106:904-910
2. Roubidoux MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C, Joynt LK, Helvie MA. Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer. AJR 1996;166:29-31
3. Murphy TJ, Conant EF, Hanau CA, Ehrlich SM, Feig SA. Bilateral breast carcinoma: mammographic and histologic correlation. Radiology 1995;195:617-621
4. Heron DE, Komarnicky LT, Hyslop T, Schwartz GF, Mansfield CM. Bilateral breast carcinoma: risk factors and outcomes for patients with synchronous and metachronous disease. Cancer 2000;88:2739-2750
5. Hungness ES, Safa M, Shaughnessy EA, et al. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts. Surgery 2000;128:702-707
6. Ligtenberg MJ, Hogervorst FB, Willems HW, et al. Characteristics of small breast and/or ovarian cancer families with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1475-1478
7. Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW. Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. Surgery 1982;91:234-240
8. Chaudary MA, Millis RR, Hoskins EO, et al. Bilateral primary breast cancer: a prospective study of disease incidence. Br J Surg 1984;71:711-714
9. Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Radiology 1995;196:427-431
10. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30
11. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999;213:881-888
12. Berg WA, Nguyen TK, Gutierrez L, Segers A. Local extent of disease: preoperative evaluation of the breast cancer patient with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. (abstr) Radiology 2001;221[P]:230
13. Rieber A, Tomczak R, Merkle E, Bohm W, Brambs HJ. MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. (abstr) AJR 1998;170[suppl]:48-49
14. Woo IJ, Orel SG, Schnall MD, et al. MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. (abstr) Radiology 2000;217[P]:526
15. Kuhl CK, Schmiedel A, Morakkabati N, Leutner C, Schild HH. Breast MR imaging of the asymptomatic contralateral'breast in the work-up or follow-up of patients with unilateral breast cancer. (abstr) Radiology 2000;217[P]:268
16. Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, Talele AC, Kopans DB. Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2002;8:145-148
17. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology. 1998
18. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR 2002;178:1211-1220
19. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:171-180
20. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ-Y, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 2002;179:171-178
21. Dershaw DD. Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman. Am J Surg 2000;180:288-289
22. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;215:267-279
23. Lo LD, Rosen MA, Schnall MD, et al. Pilot study of breast MR screening of a high-risk cohort. (abstr) Radiology 2001;221[P]:432
24. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3524-3531
25. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095-1102
26. Tilanus-Linthorst MMA, Obdeijn IMM, Bartels KCM, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;63:53-60
27. Cody HS. Routine contralateral breast biopsy: helpful or irrelevant? Ann Surg 1997;225:370-376
28. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677-684
29. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997;202:413-420
30. Ernster V, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson IC. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA 1996;275:913-918
31. Betsill WL, Rosen PP, Lieberman PH, Robbins GF. Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone. JAMA 1978;239:1863-1867
32. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Jensen RA, Schuyler PA. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer 1995;76:1197-1200
33. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, et al. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR 1996;167:1415-1419
34. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR 2001;176:399-406
35. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR 2002;178:1227-1232
36. Panizza P, De Gaspari A, Vanzulli A, et al. Accuracy of post-MR imaging second-look-sonography in previously undetected breast lesions. (abstr) Radiology 1997;205[P]:489
37. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, et al. Histopathologic significance of sonographic identification of MRI-detected breast lesions. (abstr) Radiology 2001;221[P]:232
38. Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Sarg Oncol 1999;6:546-552