Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience

Radiology

Volumn 228, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 842-850

  Jong, Roberta A ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^a   Skarpathiotakis, Mia ^a   Shumak, Rene S ^a   Danjoux, Nathalie M ^a   Gunesekara, Anoma ^a   Plewes, Donald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, radiography; Breast neoplasms, US; Contrast media; Radiography, digital

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; TUMOR GROWTH;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; IOHEXOL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 0041929652     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2283020961     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1-7.
2. Chang J, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, et al. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138:553-558.
3. Sibala JL, Chang J, Lin F, Jewell WR. Computed tomographic mammography. Arch Surg 1981; 116:114-117.
4. Watt C, Ackerman LV, Shetty P, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant disease of the breast using digital subtraction angiography of the breast. Cancer 1985; 56:1287-1292.
5. Ackerman LV, Watt C, Shetty P, et al. Breast lesions examined by digital angiography. Radiology 1985; 155:65-68.
6. Watt C, Ackerman LV, Windham JP, et al. Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1986; 159:39-42.
7. Holland AE, Hendrick RE, Jin H, Russ PD, Barentsz JO, Holland R. Correlation of high-resolution breast MR imaging with histopathology: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:601-606.
8. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:889-895.
9. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:965-974.
10. Harms SE. Technical report of the international working group on breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:978-1015.
11. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Bowsley SJ, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Invest Radiol 1995; 30:650-662.
12. Kawashima H, Matsui O, Suzuki M, et al. Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:233-243.
13. Esserman L, Kaplan E, Partridge S, et al. MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:549-559.
14. Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer J 2002; 8(suppl 1): S100-S112.
15. Merchant TE, Obertop H, de Graaf PW. Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging in breast surgery treatment planning. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 25:257-264.
16. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3524-3531.
17. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215:267-279.
18. Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, et al. Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 2002; 29:2419-2426.
19. Curry TS, Cowdey JE, Murry RC. Digital radiography. In: Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Williams & Wilkins, 1990; 404-406.
20. Kelcz F, Mistretta CA. Absorption-edge fluoroscopy using a three-spectrum technique. Med Phys 1976; 3:159-168.
21. Heywang-Köbrunner S. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:94-104.
22. Heywang S, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
23. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequence with and without Gd-DTPA - preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:639-649.
24. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
25. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Helsey KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
26. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Trouplin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiology-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
27. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
28. Lewin J, Larke F, Hendrick RE. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: development and clinical results of a new technique for breast cancer detection (abstr). Radiology 2001; 221(P):339.
29. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-405.
30. Webber RL, Underhill HR, Freimanis RI. Evaluation of observer performance of spot mammograms obtained from a hybrid breast phantom using tuned-aperture computed tomography and standardized controls. In: Yaffe MJ, ed. IWDM 2000 Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Medical Physics, 2000; 102-107.