How organizing visions influence the adoption and use of reverse auctions

Electronic Commerce Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 493-511

  Standing, Susan ^a   Standing, Craig ^a   Love, Peter ^b   Gengatharen, Denise ^a  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electronic auctions; Organizing visions; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

CASE-STUDIES; E-AUCTIONS; ELECTRONIC AUCTION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; ORGANIZING VISIONS; REVERSE AUCTION; STRATEGIC APPROACHES; TACTICAL APPROACH; TACTICALS; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 84890128586     PISSN: 13895753     EISSN: 15729362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-013-9133-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Angeles, R., & Nath, R. (2007). Business-to-business e-procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation. Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 104-115.
2. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43, 195-215.
3. Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., Reyes-Moro, A., & Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A. (2007). Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3-4), 189-220.
4. Chen, R. R., Roundy, R. O., Zhang, R. Q., & Janakiraman, G. (2005). Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement. Management Science, 51(3), 467-482.
5. Cousins, K., & Robey, D. (2005). The social shaping of electronic metals exchanges: an institutional theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 18(3), 212-229.
6. Elmaghraby, W. (2005). The effect of asymmetric bidder size on an auction's performance: are more bidders always better? Management Science, 51(12), 1763-1776.
7. Emiliani, M. L. (2006). Executive decision-making traps and B2B online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 6-9.
8. Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 13(1), 35-48.
9. Giampietro, C., & Emiliani, M. L. (2007). Coercion and reverse auctions. Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 75-84.
10. Gregg, D. G., & Walczak, S. (2010). The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(1), 1-25.
11. Grover, V., & Ramanlal, P. (1999). Six myths of information markets: information technology networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(4), 465.
12. Hackney, R., Jones, S., & Losch, A. (2007). Towards an e-government efficiency agenda: the impact of information and communication behaviour on e-reverse auctions in public sector procurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 178-191.
13. Hartley, J. L., Lane, M. D., & Hong, Y. (2004). An exploration of the adoption of E-auctions in supply management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(2), 153-161.
14. Irwin, N., & Applebaum, B. (2008). Bailout's tricky balancing act: how much is too much? Architects of government plan face dilemma in deciding how to price Wall Street's shaky mortgage-related assets. Washington Post, September 23, 2008. From http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/22/AR2008092202443. html.
15. Jap, S. D. (2002). Online reverse auctions: issues, themes and prospects for the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 506-525.
16. Jin, B. (2006). Performance implications of information technology implementation in an apparel supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 11(4), 309-316.
17. Jin, M., & Wu, S. D. (2006). Supplier coalitions in on-line reverse auctions: validity requirements and profit distribution scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 183-194.
18. Kumar, S., & Maher, M. (2008). Are the temptations of online reverse auctions appropriate for your business? Supply Chain Management, 13(4), 304-316.
19. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
20. Li, X., Gupta, J. N. D., & Koch, J. V. (2006). Effect of technological breakthroughs on electronic markets. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3-4), 389-404.
21. Lin, C., Huang, Y.-A., & Burn, J. (2007). Realising B2B e-commerce benefits: the link with IT maturity, evaluation practices, and B2BEC adoption readiness. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 806-819.
22. Lu, J., Wang, L.-Z., Yu, & Wu, J.-Y. (2009). E-auction web assessment model in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 149-172.
23. Mithas, S., Jones, J. L., & Mitchell, W. (2008). Buyer intention to use Internet-enabled reverse auctions: the role of asset specificity, product specialization, and non-contractibility. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(4), 705-724.
24. NSW Government (2006). NSW government procurement guidelines. Retrieved from http://www. dpws. nsw. gov. au/NR/rdonlyres/eq56imnxxnszyx6exteoib25urluoulspeppvq5th2tj24lv6h5vhcgw6tal5zas3gkmi3gs33czs7bralxkie5n7jc/Reverse+Auctions+Dec+06. pdf.
25. Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(2), 239-265.
26. Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(2), 145-166.
27. Parente, D., Venkatraramen, R., Fizel, J., & Millet, I. (2004). A conceptual research framework for analysing online auctions in a B2B environment. Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 287-294.
28. Power, D. (2005). Determinants of business-to-business e-commerce implementation and performance: a structural model. Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 104-115.
29. Premkumar, G. P. (2003). Perspectives of the E-Marketplace by multiple stakeholders. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 279-288.
30. Rowe, R. (2003). Handling under the hammer. Retrieved from http://www. swissport. com/download/publications/swissreporter_2003_11. pdf. April 2003.
31. Scott, W. R. (2000). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
32. Sebastiao, H. J., & Golicic, S. (2008). Supply chain strategy for nascent firms in emerging technology markets. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 75-91.
33. Sila, I. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce technologies. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 199-236.
34. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
35. Standing, C., Stockdale, R., & Love, P. (2007). Hybrid buyer supplier relationships. Information and Organization, 17(2), 89-109.
36. Standing, C., Sims, I., & Love, P. (2009). Information technology non-conformity in institutional environments: e-marketplace adoption in the government sector. Information & Management, 46(2), 138-149.
37. Standing, S., Standing, C., & Love, P. E. D. (2010). A review of e-marketplace literature, 1997-2008. Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 41-51.
38. Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1997). The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, 8(5), 458-473.
39. Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (2004). Innovation mindfully with information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(4), 553-583.
40. Teo, T. S. H., Ang, J. S. K., & Pavri, F. N. (1997). The state of strategic IS planning practices in Singapore. Information & Management, 33, 13-23.
41. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
42. Varadarajan, P. R., & Yadav, M. S. (2002). Marketing strategy and the Internet: an organizing framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 296-312.
43. White, A., Daniel, E., Ward, J., & Wilson, H. (2007). The adoption of consortium B2B e-marketplaces: an exploratory study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(1), 71-103.
44. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research; design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.