IT non-conformity in institutional environments: E-marketplace adoption in the government sector

Information and Management

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 138-149

  Standing, Craig ^a   Sims, Ian ^b   Love, Peter ^c  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electronic commerce; Electronic marketplace; Institutional theory; IT adoption; IT rejection

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

AUSTRALIA; E MARKETPLACES; ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE; GOVERNMENT SECTORS; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; IT ADOPTION; IT REJECTION; STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 63749096533     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2008.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albrecht C.C., Dean D., and Hansen J.V. Marketplace and technology standards for B2B e-commerce: progress, challenges, and the state of the art. Information and Management 42 6 (2005) 865-875
2. Beaudry A., and Pinsonneault A. Understanding user responses to information technology: a coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly 29 3 (2005) pp. 492, 493-524
3. Bowring M.A. De/constructing theory: a look at the institutional theory that positivism built. Journal of Management Enquiry 9 3 (2000) 258-270
4. Chatterjee D., Grewal R., and Sambamurthy V. Shaping up for e-commerce: institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies. MIS Quarterly 26 2 (2002) 65-89
5. Cousins K.C., and Robey D. The social shaping of electronic metals exchanges: an institutional perspective. Information Technology & People 18 3 (2005) 212-229
6. DoIT, GEM, 2002, http://www.gem.wa.gov.au (accessed 24.09.02).
7. Jones M.R., and Karsten H. Giddens's Structuration Theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly 32 1 (2008) 127-157
8. Kaefera F., and Bendoly E. Measuring the impact of organizational constraints on the success of business-to-business e-commerce efforts: a transactional focus. Information and Management 41 5 (2004) 529-541
9. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. (2004), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
10. Lamb R., and Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 27 2 (2003) 197-236
11. Lapointe L., and Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29 3 (2005) 461-492
12. Miranda S.M., and Kim Y. Professional versus political contexts: institutional mitigation and the transaction cost heuristic in information systems outsourcing. MIS Quarterly 30 3 (2006) 725-754
13. Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16 1 (1991) 145-179
14. Orlikowski W.J., and Barley S.R. Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?. MIS Quarterly 25 2 (2001) 145-166
15. Phan D.D. E-business development for competitive advantages: a case study. Information and Management 40 6 (2003) 581-590
16. Scott W.R. Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems (2003), Pearson Hall, New Jersey
17. Swanson E.B., and Ramiller N.C. Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Quarterly 28 4 (2004) 553-584
18. Teo H.H., Wei K.K., and Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly 27 1 (2003) 19-49
19. Yin R.K. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 3rd ed. (2002), Sage Publications, Newbury Park
20. Yiu D., and Makino S. The choice between venture and wholly owned subsidiary: an institutional perspective. Organization Science 13 6 (2002) 667-683