Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios

Electronic Commerce Research

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 189-220

  Cerquides, Jesús ^a   López Sánchez, Maite ^a   Reyes Moro, Antonio ^b   Rodríguez Aguilar, Juan A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b ATAMA Solutions   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Auctions; E procurement; Negotiation; Sourcing

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING;

COMPLEX NEGOTIATION; DECISION SUPPORTS; E-PROCUREMENT; GOOD AND SERVICES; HIGH COSTS; NEGOTIATION; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; PRODUCT AND SERVICES; SOURCING; SUPPORT FACILITIES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 36249032574     PISSN: 13895753     EISSN: 15729362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-007-9007-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aberdeen Group. (2002). Making e-sourcing strategic: From tactical technology to core business strategy.
2. Andersson, A., Tenhunen, M., & Ygge, F. (2000). Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on multi-agent systems (ICMAS) (pp. 39-46), Boston, MA.
3. Ariba. http//www.ariba.com
4. Baas, X., & Kwakernaak, X. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13, 47-58.
5. Bichler, M., Kalagnanam, J., & Lee, H. S. (2002). RECO: Representation and evaluation of configurable offers. In H. K. Bhargava, N. Ye (Eds.), Computational modeling and problem solving in the networked world: Interfaces in computing and optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
6. Collins, J., & Gini, M. (2001). An integer programming formulation of the bid evaluation problem for coordinated tasks. In B. Dietrich, R. V. Vohra (Eds.), IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications: Vol. 127. Mathematics of the Internet: E-auction and markets (pp. 59-74). New York: Springer.
7. Commerce One. http://www.commerceone.com.
8. De Vries, S., & Vohra, R. (2001). Combinatorial auctions: A survey.
9. E-negotiation group (2000). The London classification. In DEXA workshop on e-negotiations, London.
10. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., & Shoham, Y. (1999). Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI'99 (pp. 548-553).
11. Godo, L., & López de Mántaras, R. (1993). Fuzzy logic. In Encyclopedia of computer science and technology (Vol. 29, pp. 211-229). Pennsylvania: Dekker.
12. Holte, R. C. (2001). Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 2056. Combinatorial auctions, knapsack problems, and hill-climbing search. Berlin: Springer.
13. Hoos, H. H., & Boutilier, C. (2000). Solving combinatorial auctions using stochastic local search. In Proceedings of AAAI-2000.
14. Jap, S. D. (2002). Online, reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 506-525.
15. Kalagnanam, J., & Parkes, D. C. (2003). Auctions, bidding and exchange design. In D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, & Z. M. Shen (Eds.), Supply chain analysis in the e-business era, Chap. 10.
16. Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H., & Meyer, R. (1993). Decision making with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Makhorin, A. (2001). GLPK-GNU linear programming toolkit. http://www.gnu.org/directory/GNU/glpk.html. 2001
18. McAfee, R. P. (1995). Auction design for the real world. http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/McAfee/Papers/PDF/Auction.pdf.
19. MetalSite. http://www.metalsite.com/.
20. Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., & Gutiérrez-Magallanes, D. (2002). Quotes: A negotiation tool for industrial procurement. In Fourth international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2002), Ciudad Real, Spain, 4-6 April 2002.
21. Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., & Gutierrez-Magallanes, D. (2003). Embedding decision support in e-sourcing tools: Quotes, a case study. Group Decision and Negotiation Journal, 12, 347-355.
22. Ribeiro, R. A. (1996). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 155-181.
23. Rothkopt, M. H., Pekec, A., & Harstad, R. M. (1995). Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 44(8), 1131-1147.
24. Sandholm, T. (2000). eMediator: A next generation electronic commerce server. In International conference on autonomous agents (AGENTS), Barcelona, Spain, 3-8 June 2000.
25. Sandholm, T. W. (2002). Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 135, 1-54.
26. Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., & Levine, D. (2002). Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations. In First international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS'02) (pp. 69-76), Bologna, Italy.
27. Sandholm, T., & Suri, S. (2006). Side constraints and non-price attributes in markets. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(2), 321-330.
28. Stephens Inc. (2001). Internet supply chain team. Strategic sourcing: applications to turn direct materials procurement into competitive advantage. Industry Report, 30 January 2001.
29. Van de Walle, B., Heitsch, S., & Faratin, P. (2001): Coping with one-to-many multi-criteria negotiations in electronic markets. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on negotiations in electronic markets: Beyond price discovery, held during DEXA 2001 (pp. 747-751), Munich, Germany, September 2001.