Argumentation and reasoning in life and in school: Implications for the design of school science learning environments

Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research

Volumn 9789400724709, Issue , 2012, Pages 117-133

  Bricker, Leah A ^a   Bell, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

argumentation and learning; Computer supported argumentation; Design based research; ethnography of argumentation; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931321362     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E.W., Gutiérrez, K. D., et al. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle, WA: The LIFE (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments) Center & The Center for Multicultural Education; University of Washington.
3. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N.Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto, ON: The University of Toronto.
4. Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 115-143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Lee, T. R., Reeve, S., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2006). Understanding the cultural foundations of children's biological knowledge: Insights from everyday cognition research. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D.T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1029-1035). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Reeve, S., Zimmerman, H. T., & Tzou, C. (in press). Discovering and supporting successful learning pathways of children in and out of school: How everyday expertise develops across places and pursuits. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, & R. Stevens (Eds.), LOST Learning: Learning about out-of-school time learning opportunities. New York, NY: Springer.
7. Billig, M. (1987/1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (new ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brice Heath, S. (1983).Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.
10. Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
12. Corsaro, W. A. (2003). We're friends right Inside kids' culture. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
13. Corsaro, W. A., & Maynard, D. W. (1996). Format tying in discussion and argumentation among Italian and American children. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 157-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-298.
15. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
16. Erickson, K., & Stull, D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Fine, G. A. (1979). The idioculture of little league baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 733-745.
18. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
19. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
20. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children's arguing. In S. U. Phillips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1986). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
22. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is "strong objectivity" In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49-82). New York: Routledge.
23. Harris, M. (1987). Cultural anthropology (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 433-475.
24. Heyl, B. S. (2001). Ethnographic interviewing. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369-383). London, UK: Sage.
25. Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73-93.
26. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Keith, W., & Rehg, W. (2008). Argumentation in science: The cross-fertilization of argumentation theory and science studies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J.Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 211-239). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Kelly, G. J., & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 28-55.
29. Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178.
30. Kuhn, D. (1993). Connecting scientific and informal reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 74-103.
31. Kuhn, L., Kenyon, L., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Fostering scientific argumentation by creating a need for students to attend to each other's claims and evidence. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) (pp. 370-375). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
32. Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Reviews, Anthropology, 33, 625-649.
33. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.). (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Linn, M. C., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about 'rats in space' and 'deformed frogs'. Educational Technology Research and Development (ETR&D), 47(2), 61-84.
36. McDermott, R. P. (1996). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
38. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
39. Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbuam and Associates.
40. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
41. Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes, 15, 37-72.
42. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
43. Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. M. (1992). Distributed multimedia learning environments:Why and how Interactive Learning Environments, 2(2), 73-109.
44. Pike, K.L. (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Braun-Brumfield.
45. Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Children's self-documentation and understanding the concepts 'health' and 'unhealthy.' International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1953-1974.
46. Sandoval,W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
47. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372.
48. Sarangapani, P. M. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi, India: Sage. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49. Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin's framework for the analysis of everyday argumentation: Some methodological considerations. Argumentation, 17, 185-205.
50. Tannen, D. (1999). The argument culture: Stopping America's war of words. New York: Ballantine Books.
51. Tilly, C. (2006). Why: What happens when people give reasons. . .and why. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Tindale, C. W. (1999). The act of arguing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
53. Toulmin, S. E. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
55. Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press LLC.
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
58. Wenzel, J. A. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp&J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9-26). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
59. Willis, P. (1997/2000). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
60. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.) (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.