SSVEP and ERP measurement of cognitive fatigue caused by stereoscopic 3D

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 525, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 89-94

  Mun, Sungchul ^a,c   Park, Min Chul ^b   Park, Sangin ^a   Whang, Mincheol ^a  

^a Sangmyung University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^c University of Science and Technology (UST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive fatigue; ERP; SSVEP; Stereoscopic 3D; Visual fatigue

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STEADY STATE; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865415648     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.049     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Butler P.D., Zemon V., Schechter I., Saperstein A.M., Hoptman M.J. Early-stage visual processing cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005, 62:495-504.
2. Friederici A.D., Pfeifer E., Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1993, 1:183-192.
3. Friman O., Volosyak I., Graser A. Multiple channel detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2007, 54:742-750.
4. Hoffman D.M., Girshick A.R., Akeley K., Banks M.S. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-30.
5. Kaseda Y., Jiang C., Kurokawa K., Mimori Y., Nakamura S. Objective evaluation of fatigue by event-related potentials. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1998, 158:96-100.
6. Kham K., Li H.C.O., Lee S. The effect of viewing distance and the speed of motion-in-depth on visual fatigue. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility 2009, 12:169-180.
7. Kim Y.J., Grabowecky M., Paller K.A., Muthu K., Suzuki S. Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:117-125.
8. Kuze J., Ukai K. Subjective evaluation of visual fatigue caused by motion images. Displays 2008, 29:159-166.
9. Lambooij M., Ijsselsteijn W., Fortuin M., Heynderickx I. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 2009, 53:30201-30214.
10. Lee E.C., Heo H., Park K.R. The comparative measurements of eyestrain caused by 2D and 3D displays. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 2010, 56:1677-1683.
11. H.C.O. Li, J.H., Seo, K.T., Kham, S.H. Lee, Measurement of 3D visual fatigue using event-related potential (ERP): 3D oddball paradigm, unpublished results presented at the 3DTV-CON'08, May 28-30, Istanbul, Turkey, 2008, pp. 213-216.
12. Morgan S.T., Hansen J.C., Hillyard S.A. Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93:4770-4774.
13. Muller M.M., Hillyard S. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention. Clinical Neurophysiology 2000, 111:1544-1552.
14. Murata A., Uetake A., Takasawa Y. Evaluation of mental fatigue using feature parameter extracted from event-related potential. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2005, 35:761-770.
15. Olofsson J., Nordin S., Sequeira H., Polich J. Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology 2008, 77:247-265.
16. Pastor M.C., Bradley M.M., Low A., Versace F., Molto J., Lang P.J. Affective picture perception: emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Research 2008, 1189:145-151.
17. Shibata T., Kim J., Hoffman D.M., Banks M.S. The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of Vision 2011, 11:1-29.
18. Soskins M., Rosenfeld J.P., Niendam T. Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis: complex vs. simple paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2001, 40:173-180.
19. Toffanin P., Jong R.D., Johnson A., Martens S. Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 72:289-298.
20. Vos S.H., Gunter T.C., Kolk H.H., Mulder G. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:41-63.
21. Yano S., Ide S., Mitsuhashi T., Thwaites H. A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images. Displays 2002, 23:191-201.
22. Yeshurun Y., Levy L. Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution. Psychological Science 2003, 14:225-231.