Reading performance as screening tool for visual complaints from stereoscopic content

Displays

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 84-90

  Lambooij, M ^a,b   Fortuin, M F ^a,c,d   Ijsselsteijn, W A ^a   Heynderickx, I ^b,e  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Objective and subjective measurement; Reading performance; Screening tool; Visual discomfort; Visual fatigue

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER APPLICATIONS; READING PERFORMANCE; READING SPEED; SCREENING TOOL; VISUAL DISCOMFORT; VISUAL FATIGUE; VISUAL SCREENING;

DISPLAY DEVICES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

BINOCULARS;

EID: 84861346950     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2012.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Emoto, Y. Nojiri, and F. Okano Changes in fusional vergence limit and its hysteresis after viewing stereoscopic TV Displays 25 2004 67 76
2. T. Shibata, J. Kim, D.M. Hoffman, and M.S. Banks The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays Journal of Vision 11 8 2011 1 29
3. M. Lambooij, M.F. Fortuin, W.A. IJsselsteijn, B.J.W. Evans, and I. Heynderickx Measuring visual discomfort associated with 3D displays Journal of the Society for Information Display 18 11 2010 931 943
4. M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, B.J.W. Evans, I. Heynderickx, Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, submitted for publication, doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2011.2157193.
5. E. Peli Optometric and perceptual issues with head-mounted display P. Mouroulis, Optical Design for Visual Instrumentation 1999 New York McGraw-Hill 205 276
6. M. Barkowsky, R. Cousseau, and P. Le Callet Is visual fatigue changing the perceived depth accuracy on an autostereoscopic display? Proceedings of the SPIE 78611V 2011
7. W. Chen, J. Fournier, M. Barkowsky, and P. Le Callet New stereoscopic video shooting rule based on stereoscopic distortion parameters and comfortable viewing zone Proceedings of the SPIE 78631O 2011
8. S.J. Daly, R.T. Held, and D.M. Hoffman Perceptual issues in stereoscopic signal processing IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 57 2 2011 347 361
9. M. Emoto, T. Niida, and F. Okana Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television Journal of Display Technology 1 2005 328 340 (Pubitemid 43001032)
10. D.M. Hoffman, A.R. Girshick, K. Akeley, and M.S. Banks Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue Journal of Vision 8 3 2008 1 30
11. M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, and I. Heynderickx Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 53 3 2009 1 14
12. M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, and I. Heynderickx Visual discomfort: assessment methods and modeling Displays 32 4 2010 209 218
13. M. Pölönen, M. Salmimaa, V. Alltonen, J. Häkkinen, and J. Takatalo Subjective measures of presence and discomfort in viewers of color-separation-based stereoscopic cinema Journal of the Society for Information Display 17 5 2009 459 466
14. F. Speranza, W.J. Tam, R. Renaud, and N. Hur Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images Proceedings of the SPIE 6055 2006 60550B
15. S. Yano, M. Emoto, and T. Mitsuhashi Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images Displays 25 2004 141 150
16. B.J.W. Evans Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies fifth ed. 2007 Elsevier Oxford
17. K.J. Ciuffreda The scientific basis for and efficacy of optometric vision therapy in nonstrabismic accommodative and vergence disorders Optometry 73 12 2002 735 762
18. R. Karania, and B.J.W. Evans The Mallett fixation disparity test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 26 5 2006 507 522 (Pubitemid 44222254)
19. R. Montes-Mico Prevalence of general dysfunctions in binocular vision Annals of Ophthalmology 33 3 2001 205 208 (Pubitemid 32888764)
20. J.E. Richman, and R.C. Laudon A survey of the prevalence of binocular % accommodative dysfunctions in a sample of optometry students Journal of Behavioral Optometry 13 2 2002 31 33
21. M. Scheiman Accommodative and binocular vision disorders associated with video display terminals: diagnosis and management issues Journal of the American Optometric Association 67 9 1996 531 539
22. D. Stidwill Clinical survey: epidemiology of strabismus Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 17 6 1997 536 539
23. B.J.W. Evans Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies third ed. 1997 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford
24. A.J. Wilkins, R.J. Jeanes, P.D. Pumfrey, and M. Laskier Rate of reading test: its reliability, and its validity in the assessment of the effects of coloured overlays Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 16 6 1996 491 497 (Pubitemid 26378655)
25. E.J. Borsting, M.W. Rouse, G.L. Mitchell, M. Scheiman, S.A. Cotter, J. Cooper, M.T. Kulp, and R. London The Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Group, validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in children aged 9-18 years Optometry Vision Science 80 12 2003 832 838 (Pubitemid 38010102)
26. G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals third ed. 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
27. M.E. Shy, E.M. Frohman, Y.T. So, J.C. Arezzo, D.R. Cornblath, M.J. Giuliani, J.C. Kincaid, J.L. Ochoa, G.J. Parry, and L.H. Weimer Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 60 6 2003 898 904 (Pubitemid 36348918)
28. L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment Psychological Review 34 1927 273 286
29. M. Boschman ThurcatD: a tool for analysing ratings on an ordinalcategory scale Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 32 2000 379 388
30. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham Multivariate Data Analysis 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
31. E. Sheedy, J. Hayes, and J. Engle Is all asthenopia the same? Optometry and Vision Science 80 2003 732 739 (Pubitemid 37421125)
32. M.F. Fortuin, M.T.M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, I. Heynderickx, D.F. Edgar, and B.J.W. Evans An exploration of the initial effects of stereoscopic displays on optometric parameters Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 31 1 2010 33 44
33. R. Redert, P. Berretty, C. Varekamp, B. van Geest, J. Bruijns, Challenges in 3DTV image processing, in: Proceedings of the SPIE 649014, 2007.