The relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1-13

  Fukushima, Tetsuya ^a   Torii, Masahito ^a   Ukai, Kazuhiko ^a   Wolffsohn, James S ^b   Gilmartin, Bernard ^b  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Convergence; Convergence induced accommodation; Defocus induced accommodation; Stereo display; Stereoscopic image

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950351206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.13.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akeley, K., Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23, 804-813.
2. Bruce, A. S., Atchison, D. A., & Bhoola, H. (1995). Accommodation-convergence relationships and age. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, 406-413.[Article]
3. Ciuffreda, K. J., & Kenyon, R. V. (1983). Accommodative vergence and accommodation in normals, amblyopes, and strabismus. In C. M. Schor & K. J. Ciuffreda (Eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects (pp. 101-173). Boston: Butterworths.
4. Emoto, M., Niida, T., & Okano, F. (2005). Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television. IEEE/OSA Journal of Display Technology, 1, 328-340.
5. Fincham, E. F., & Walton, J. (1957). The reciprocal actions of accommodation and vergence. Journal of Physiology (London), 137, 488-508.
6. Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. JournalofVision,8(3):33, 1-30, http://journal of vision. org/8/3/33/, doi:10.1167/8.3.33.[Article]
7. Howard, I. P. (2002). Seeing in depth: Volume 1. Basic mechanism I (p. 392). Canada: Porteous.
8. Hung, G. K. (1998). Dynamic model of the vergence eye movement system: Simulations using MATLAB/SIMULINK. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 55, 59-68.
9. Jacobs, A., Mather, J., Winlow, R., Montgomery, D., Jones, G., Willis, M., et al. (2003). 2D/3D switchable displays. Sharp Technical Journal, 85, 15-18.
10. Kuze, J., & Ukai, K. (2008). Subjective evaluation of visual fatigue caused by motion images. Displays, 29, 159-166.
11. Okada, Y., Ukai, K., Wolffsohn, J. S., Gilmartin, B., Iijima, A., & Bando, T. (2006). Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus-and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Research, 46, 475-484.
12. Rosenfield, M., Ciuffreda, K. J., & Chen, H. W. (1995). Effect of age on the interaction between the AC/A and CA/C ratios. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15, 451-455.
13. Schor, C. M. (1992). A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: Simulations of step and frequency responses. Optometry and Vision Science, 69, 258-269.
14. Schor, C. M., Alexander, J., Cormack, L., & Stevenson, S. (1992). Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 12, 307-318.
15. Schor, C. M., & Kotulak, J. C. (1986). Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Research, 26, 927-942.
16. Semmlow, J., & Wetzel, P. (1979). Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 639-645.
17. Semmlow,J.L.,&Hung,G.K.(1983).Thenear response: Theories and control. In C. M. Schor & K. J. Ciuffreda (Eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects (pp. 175-195). Boston: Butterworths.
18. Shibata, T., Kawai, T., Ohta, K., Otsuki, M., Miyake, N., Yoshihara, Y., et al. (2005). Stereoscopic 3-D display with optical correction for the reduction of the discrepancy between accommodation and convergence. Journal of the Society for Information Displays, 13, 665-671.
19. Torii, M., Okada, Y., Ukai, K., Wolffsohn, J. S., & Gilmartin, B. (2008). Dynamic measurement of accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. Journal of Modern Optics, 55, 557-567.
20. Tsuetaki, T. K., & Schor, C. M. (1987). Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 64, 437-449.
21. Ukai, K., & Howarth, P. A. (2008). Visual stress caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: Background, theories, and observations. Displays, 29, 106-116.
22. Ukai, K., & Kato, Y. (2002). The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3-D display. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 22, 385-388.
23. Yano, S., Emoto, M., & Mitsuhashi, T. (2004). Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images. Displays, 25, 141-150.
24. Yano, S., Ide, S., Mitsuhashi, T., & Thwaites, H. (2002). A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images. Displays, 23, 191-201.