A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 709-729

  Besiou, Maria ^a   Hunter, Mark Lee ^b   van Wassenhove, Luk N ^b  

^a KÜHNE LOGISTICS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

Agenda setting; Media; Stakeholder; Stakeholder media; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889571197     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1956-z     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Amenta, E., Caren, N., Olasky, S. J., & Stobaugh, J. E. (2009). All the movements fit to print: Who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in the New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 636-656.
2. Associated Press. (2000, June 22). State high court to decide if Nike violated false-advertising laws. Mark Kasky sued Nike.
3. Bakir, V. (2006). Policy agenda setting and risk communication: greenpeace, shell, and issues of trust. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 67-88.
4. Basin, R. (1996, October 17). Boycott Nike. CBS News 48 Hours.
5. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Full Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-640.
6. Berger, B. K. (2001). Private issues and public policy: Locating the corporate agenda in agenda-setting theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(2), 91-126.
7. Berkowitz, D., & Adams, D. B. (1990). Information subsidy and agenda-building in local television news. Journalism Quarterly, 67(4), 723-731.
8. Bogert, C. (2010). Similar paths, different missions: International journalists and human rights observers. http://www. nieman. harvard. edu/reportsitem. aspx?id=102468.
9. Brunk, K. H., & Blümelhuber, C. (2011). One strike and you're out: Qualitative insights into the formation of consumers' ethical company or brand perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 64, 134-141.
10. Carroll, C. E. (2010). Should firms circumvent or work through the news media? Public Relations Review, 36(3), 278-280.
11. Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. E. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36-46.
12. Cherin, J. (1999, May 11). China protesters urge U. S. goods boycott through internet. Dow Jones International News.
13. Colleoni, E. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 228-248.
14. Collins, E. L., Zoch, L. M., & McDonald, C. S. (2004). When [professional] worlds collide: Implications of Kasky v. Nike for corporate reputation management. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 411-417.
15. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 135-139.
16. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279-295.
17. Coyle, R. G. (1979). Management system dynamics. New York: Wiley and Sons.
18. Coyle, R. G. (1996). System dynamics modelling: A practical approach. London: Chapman & Hall.
19. Cropanzano, R., Chrobot-Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., & Prehar, C. A. (2004). Accountability for corporate injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 107-133.
20. Curtin, P. A. (1999). Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(1), 53-90.
21. Danone. (2004). Rapport d'Activité 2004. http://bib. kuleuven. be/files/ebib/jaarverslagen/Danone_2004. pdf. Accessed 2 July 2013.
22. D'Aveni, R. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 634-657.
23. de Castro, G. M., Navas López, J. E., & López Sáez, P. (2006). Business and social reputation: exploring the concept and main dimensions of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 361-370.
24. Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192-211.
25. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Incorporated.
26. Deephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2009). Linking Social Issues to Organizational Impact: The Role of Infomediaries and the Infomediary Process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 541-553.
27. Duncan, C. (1997, October 31). Activists share information about Nike with Dean Smith. Associated Press Newswires.
28. Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135.
29. Firoz, N. M., & Ammaturo, C. R. (2002). Sweatshop labour practices: The bottom line to bring change to the new millennium case of the apparel industry. Humanomics, 18(1/2), 29-45.
30. Formbrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
31. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
33. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
34. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
35. Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
36. Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company.
37. Gevirtz, L. (1996, September 26). Reebok invites Nike to stamp out child labor. Reuters News.
38. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda-setting. In M. E. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. H. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting (pp. 3-14). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Global Exchange. (2001, January 14). Nike refuses to take responsibility. http://www. globalexchange. org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/kukdong011401. html. Accessed 24 August 2011.
40. Graham, D., & Woods, N. G. (2006). Making corporate self-regulation effective in developing countries. World Development, 34(5), 868-883.
41. Hendry, J. R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 79-99.
42. Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., Nartey, L. (2011). Spinning gold: The financial returns to external stakeholder engagement. In 11th annual strategy and the business environment (SBE) conference, Wharton, PA.
43. Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12, 414-434.
44. Holmström, S. (2005). Reframing public relations: The evolution of a reflective paradigm for organizational legitimization. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 497-504.
45. Holmström, S. (2007). Niklas Luhmann: Contingency, risk, trust and reflection. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 255-262.
46. Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70-90.
47. Hunter, M. L., Le Menestrel, M., & De Bettignies, H.-C. (2008). Beyond control: Crisis strategies and stakeholder media in the Danone boycott of 2001. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(4), 335-350.
48. Hunter, M. L., & Soberman, D. A. (2010). 'The equalizer': Measuring and explaining the impact of online communities on consumer markets. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 225-247.
49. Hunter, M. L., van Wassenhove, L. N., Besiou, M., van Halderen, M. (2011). The agenda-setting power of stakeholder media. INSEAD working paper. (A different version of this article is forthcoming in California Management Review at this writing; we have used page references from the INSEAD Working Paper version).
50. Ikram, T. (1996, November 25). Nike plant in Pakistan takes aim at child labor. Reuters News.
51. King, B. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395-421.
52. King, B. G. (2011). The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Social Problems, 58(4), 491-517.
53. King, B. G., & Pearce, N. (2010). The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 249-267.
54. King, B. G., & Soule, S. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 413-442.
55. Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., & Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding influence on corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 147-165.
56. Klein, N. (1997, February 24). Just doing it lands Nike in ethical hot water. The Toronto Star.
57. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68, 92-109.
58. Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3-4), 367-391.
59. Lewis, J., Williams, A., Franklin, B., Thomas, J., & Mosdell, N. (2005). The quality and independence of British journalism: Tracking the changes over 20 years. Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies.
60. Lim, S.-J., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footwear industry's evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 143-156.
61. Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. The American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144-1158.
62. Livesey, S. M. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. Journal of Business Communication, 38(1), 58-91.
63. Locke, R. M., Qin, F., & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(1), 3-31.
64. Luders, J. (2006). The economics of movement success: Business responses to civil rights mobilization. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 963-998.
65. Luh, S. S. (2002, February 22). Report claims abuses by Nike contractors; sporting-goods firm funded study in Indonesia, intends to verify it. Wall Street Journal.
66. Manning, J. (1996, November 26). Nike hails factory that bans child labor. The Oregonian.
67. Marshall, K., White, R., & Fischer, A. (2007). Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: On the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(11), 3129-3146.
68. McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
69. McCombs, M. E. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557.
70. McCombs, M. E., & Funk, M. (2011). Shaping the agenda of local daily newspapers: A methodology merging the agenda setting and community structure perspectives. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 905-919.
71. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
72. McHale, J. P., Zompetti, J. P., & Moffitt, M. A. (2007). A hegemonic model of crisis communication: Truthfulness and repercussions for free speech in Kasky v. Nike. Journal of Business Communication, 44(4), 374-402.
73. McNulty, S. (2002, October 2). BP wells may be regulated. Financial Times.
74. McNulty, S. (2003, January 3). Judge tightens controls over BP's Alaska unit. Financial Times.
75. Melville, G. (1997, May 26). Critics can't stop swatting the swoosh. Footwear News.
76. Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 682-707.
77. Meraz, S. (2011). The fight for how to think: Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism, 12(1), 107-127.
78. Mika, M. (2006). Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces, 85(2), 915-941.
79. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
80. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. (1997, June 26). U. S. investment research: A report on conditions in international manufacturing facilities for NIKE. Nike is doing a 'good job'.
81. Moser, S. C. (2007). In the long shadows of inaction: The quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 7(2), 124-144.
82. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 357-378.
83. Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. (2011). A global mining corporation and local communities in the lake Victoria zone: The case of Barrick Gold multinational in Tanzania. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 253-282.
84. O'Rourke, D. (2006). Multi-stakeholder regulation: Privatizing or socializing global labor standards? World Development, 34(5), 899-918.
85. Palazzo, G., & Basu, K. (2007). The ethical backlash of corporate branding. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 333-346.
86. Protess, D. L., Cook, F. L., Doppelt, J. C., Ettema, J. S., Gordon, M. T., Leff, D. R., et al. (1992). The journalism of outrage: Investigative reporting and agenda building in America. New York: Guilford Press.
87. Pruyt, E., & Kwakkel, J. (2007). Combining system dynamics and ethics: Towards more science? Paper presented at the 25th international conference of the system dynamics society, July 29-August 2, Boston, USA.
88. Ragas, M. W. (2010). Agenda-building and agenda-setting in corporate proxy contests: Exploring influence among public relations efforts, financial media coverage and investor opinion. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
89. Ragas, M. W. (2012). Issue and stakeholder intercandidate agenda setting among corporate information subsidies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 91-111.
90. Ragas, M. W., & Roberts, M. S. (2009). Agenda setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand communities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 45-64.
91. Read, R. (1997, September 21). New report puts Nike in labor spotlight. The Oregonian.
92. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148-154.
93. Reynolds, S. J., Schultz, F. C., & Hekman, D. R. (2006). Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 285-301.
94. Saporito, B. (1998). Can Nike get unstuck? Time, 151(12), 48.
95. Saunders, B. (1997, November 6). Conscience still twinges on campus. Raleigh News & Observer.
96. Schurman, R., & Munro, W. (2006). Ideas, thinkers and social networks: The process of grievance construction in the anti-genetic engineering movement. Theory and Society, 35(1), 1-38.
97. Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M. E., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2-24.
98. Shoemaker, P., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York: Routledge.
99. Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U. S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 123-155.
100. Sohn, Y. J., Lariscy, R. W., & Tinkham, S. F. (2009). The impact of CEO reputation: Negative news and economic decisions. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(1), 1-18.
101. Stancill, J. (1997, October 30). UNC activists organizing big-game play against Nike. Raleigh News & Observer.
102. Sterman, J. D. (1991). A skeptic's guide to computer models. In G. O. Barney, W. B. Kreutzer, & M. J. Garrett (Eds.), Managing a nation: The microcomputer software catalog (pp. 209-229). Boulder: Westview Press.
103. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
104. Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8-25.
105. Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2010). A new look at agenda-setting effects-Comparing the predictive power of overall political news consumption and specific news media consumption across different media channels and media types. Journal of Communication, 60, 271-292.
106. Tedesco, J. C. (2001). Issue and strategy agenda-setting in the 2000 presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2048-2067.
107. Tedesco, J. C. (2005a). Intercandidate agenda setting in the 2004 democratic presidential primary. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 92-113.
108. Tedesco, J. C. (2005b). Issue and strategy agenda setting in the 2004 presidential election: Exploring the candidate-journalist relationship. Journalism Studies, 6(2), 187-201.
109. Tsuchiya, T. (2003). Corporate business ethics-Analysis and leverage. Paper presented at the 21st international conference of the system dynamics society, July 20-24, New York, USA.
110. Turk, J. V. (1985). Information subsidies and influence. Public Relations Review, 11(3), 10-25.
111. Uscinski, J. E. (2009). When does the public's issue agenda affect the media's issue agenda (and vice-versa)? Developing a framework for media-public influence. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 796-815.
112. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33-42.
113. Wilson, E. (1997, October 7). Labor rallies on seventh ave. Women's Wear Daily.
114. Woodly, D. (2008). New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice, 134, 109-123.
115. Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57, 79-98.
116. Ziek, P. E. (2012). Inter-organizational infrastructure for communication: A study of the generative aspects of the communication context on CSR strategy and instrumentation. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.