Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 357-378

  Neville, Benjamin A ^a   Bell, Simon J ^a   Whitwell, Gregory J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

legitimacy; power; stakeholder identification; stakeholder salience; urgency

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051669494     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A.: 1999. 'Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values'. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-25.
2. Aldrich, H. E. & Fiol, C. M.: 1994. 'Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation'. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-70.
3. Almazan, A., Suarez, J., & Titman, S.: 2009. 'Firms' stakeholders and the costs of transparency'. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 871-900.
4. Ashforth, B. E. & Gibbs, B. W.: 1990. 'The double-edge of organizational legitimation'. Organization Science, 1, 177-94.
5. Bannerjee, S. B.: 2001. 'Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations'. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 489-513.
6. Bansal, P. & Clelland, I.: 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
7. Barney, J.: 1991. 'Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage'. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99 - 120.
8. Baumann, Z.: 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie (eds.): 1997, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
10. Berman, S., Wicks, A., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.: 1999. 'Does stakeholder orientation matter? An empirical examination of the relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance'. Academy of Management Journal. 42(5), 488-506.
11. Bowie, N. E.: 1994. 'A Kantian Theory of Capitalism', in Ruffin Lecture (Olsson Center for Applied Ethics, Charlottesville, VA).
12. Buysse, K. & Verbeke, A. 2003: 'Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective'. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.
13. Carroll, A. B.: 1979. 'A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance'. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
14. Carroll, G. R. & Hannan, M. T.: 1989. 'Density delay in the evolution of organizational population'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 411-30.
15. Casciaro, T. & Piskorski, M. J.: 2005. 'Power imbalance, mutual dependence and constraint adoption: A closer look at resource dependence theory'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167-199.
16. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995. 'A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance'. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
17. nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Deephouse, D. L. & Carter, S. M.: 2005. 'An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation'. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-60.
19. Deephouse, D. L. & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R.: 2008. 'Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process'. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541-553.
20. Deephouse, D. L. and M. Suchman: 2008, 'Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism', in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (Sage Publications, Far East Square, Singapore), pp. 49-77.
21. Devinney, T. M.: 2009. 'Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility'. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44-56.
22. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W.: 1983. 'The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields'. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-60.
23. Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.: 1994. 'Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory'. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252-284.
24. Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.: 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E.: 1995. 'The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications'. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
26. Driscoll, C. & Starik, M.: 2004. 'The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment'. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55-73.
27. Dunfee, T. W.: 2008. 'Stakeholder theory: Managing corporate social responsibility in a multiple actor context'. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 346-362, New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Eesley, C. & Lenox, M. J.: 2006. 'Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action'. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 765-781.
29. Etzioni, A.: 1964. Modern organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. Evan, W. M. & Freeman, R. E.: 1993. 'A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism'. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N. E. (Eds.): Ethical Theory and Business, 75-93. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E.: 1984. Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Fligstein, N.: 1997. 'Social skills and institutional theory'. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 397-405.
33. Freeman, R. E.: 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
34. French, J. & Raven, B.: 1959. 'The bases of social power'. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, 150-167. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
35. Frooman, J.: 1999. 'Stakeholder influence strategies'. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
36. Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C.: 2009. 'An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs'. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45-63.
37. Gioia, D. A.: 1999. 'Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing'. Academy of Management Review, 24, 228-32.
38. Gustafson, A.: 2000. 'Making sense of postmodern business ethics'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(3), 645-58.
39. Harvey, B. and Schaefer, A.: 2001. 'Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U. K. electricity and water utilities'. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3), 243-260.
40. Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P. 1999: 'The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance'. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
41. Hoffman, A. J.: 1999. 'Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U. S. chemical industry'. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-71.
42. Hsieh, N.: 2007. 'Maximization, incomparability, and managerial choice'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 497-513.
43. Hybels, R. C.: 1995. 'On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model'. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management 38, 241-245.
44. Jawahar, I. M. & McLaughlin, G. L.: 2001. 'Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach'. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397-414.
45. Jensen, M. C.: 2002. 'Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
46. Jensen, M. C.: 2008. 'Non-rational behavior, value conflicts, stakeholder theory, and form behavior'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 167-171.
47. Jones, T. M.: 1991. 'Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model'. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-95.
48. Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A.: 2007. 'Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture'. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
49. King, B.: 2008. 'A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence'. Business & Society, 47(1), 21-49.
50. Knox, S. & Gruar, C.: 2007. 'The application of stakeholder theory to relationship marketing strategy development in a non-profit organization'. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(2), 115-135.
51. Kohlberg, L.: 1969. 'Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization'. In Golin, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research, 347-480. Chicago: Rand McNally.
52. Lawrence, A. T., Weber, J., & Post, J. E.: 2005. Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.
53. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P.: 2000. 'A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business'. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185-204.
54. Lotila, P.: 2010. 'Corporate responsiveness to social pressure: An interaction-based model'. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 395-409.
55. Magness, V.: 2008. 'Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience'. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177-192.
56. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B.: 2005. 'Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada'. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657-679.
57. Marcoux A. M. (2000) 'Balancing act'. In: DeJardins J. R., McCall J. J. (Eds) Contemporary issues in business ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, pp. 92-100.
58. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.: 2001. 'Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective'. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-27.
59. Menguç B., Auh S., & Ozanne L.: 2010. 'The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm's performance'. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279-298.
60. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B.: 1977. 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony'. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-63.
61. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J.: 1997. 'Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts'. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-86.
62. Mosakowski, E. & Earley, P. C.: 2000. 'A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research'. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 796-812.
63. Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C.: 1997. 'The evolution of corporate social responsiveness'. Business and Society, 36(3), 296-321.
64. Neville, B. A. & Menguç, B.: 2006. 'Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders'. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 377-391.
65. O'Higgins, E. R. E.: 2010. 'Corporations, civil society, and stakeholders: An organizational conceptualization'. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 157-176.
66. Oliver, C.: 1991. 'Strategic responses to institutional processes'. The Academy of Management Review, 161(1), 145-79.
67. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes. S. L.: 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
68. Pajunen, K.: 2006. 'Stakeholder influences in organizational survival'. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1261-1288.
69. Palazzo, G & Scherer, A. G.: 2006. 'Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework'. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.
70. Parent, M. M. & Deephouse, D. L.: 2007. 'A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers'. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.
71. Parsons, T.: 1960. Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
72. Peteraf, M.: 1993. 'The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view'. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-92.
73. Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S.: 2008. 'After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization'. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 730-749.
74. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R.: 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
75. Phillips, R.: 2003. Stakeholder theory and organization ethics. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
76. Phillips, N. and N. Malhotra: 2008, 'Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory', in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby, R. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (Sage Publications, Far East Square, Singapore), pp. 702-720.
77. Rawls, J.: 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
78. Rest, J. R.: 1979. Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
79. Roloff, J.: 2008. 'Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management'. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 233-250.
80. Rosenthal, S. B. & Buchholz, R. A.: 2000. Rethinking business ethics: A pragmatic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Rowley, T. J.: 1997, 'Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences', The Academy of Management Review22(4), 887-910.
82. Rowley, T. J. & Moldoveanu, M.: 2003. 'When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization'. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204-19.
83. Ruef, M. & Scott, W. R.: 1998. 'A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 877-904.
84. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D.: 1991. 'Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders'. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75.
85. Scott, W. R.: 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
86. Sethi, S. P.: 1979. 'A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns', The Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 63-74.
87. Suchman, M. C.: 1995. 'Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches'. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
88. Sundaram, A. K. & Inkpen, A. C.: 2004a. 'The corporate objective revisited'. Organization Science, 15(3), 350-363.
89. Sundaram, A. K. & Inkpen, A. C.: 2004b. 'Stakeholder theory and "The corporate objective revisited": A reply'. Organization Science, 15(3), 370-371.
90. ten Bos, R.: 1997. 'Business ethics and Bauman ethics'. Organization Studies, 18, 997-1014.
91. ten Bos, R. & Willmott, H.: 2001. 'Towards a post-dualistic business ethics: Interweaving reason and emotion in working life'. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 769-93.
92. Usborne, D.: 2009. 'Shell Settles Nigerian human rights abuses lawsuit for $15. 5 m Shell settles Nigerian human rights abuses lawsuit for $15. 5 m', The Independent online, June 9.
93. van Oosterhout, J, Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Kapstein, M.: 2006. 'The internal morality of contracting: Advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics'. Academy of Management Review, 31, 521-539.
94. Waddock, S. A. & Graves, S. B.: 1997. 'The corporate social performance-financial performance link'. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
95. Wasserman, S. and Galaskiewicz, J.: 1994. Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96. Weber, M.: 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. Wernerfelt, B.: 1984. 'A resource based view of the firm'. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171 - 180.
98. Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, Jr., D. R., & Freeman, R. E.: 1994. 'A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475-498.
99. Winn, M. I. & Keller L. R.: 2001. 'A modelling methodology for multiobjective multistakeholder decisions: Implications for research'. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 166-81.
100. Wolfe R. A., Putler D. S. (2002) How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups?. Organization Science13: 64-80.
101. Zadek, S.: 2004. 'The path to corporate responsibility'. Harvard Business Review, 82, 125-32.
102. Zimmerman, M. A. & Zeitz, G. J.: 2002. 'Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy'. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414-431.