Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: On the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 3129-3146

  Marshall, Keith ^a   White, Rehema ^b   Fischer, Anke ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Biodiversity; Conflict; Conservation; Hen harrier; Red grouse; Stakeholders; Wildlife management

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; GAMEBIRD; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CONFLICT; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

AVES; RAPTORES; TETRAONIDAE;

EID: 34548190031     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9167-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bagchi S, Mishra C (2006) Living with large carnivores: predation on livestock by the snow leopard (Uncia uncia). J Zool 268:217-224
2. Bennett E, Neiland A, Anang E, Bannerman P, Rahman AA, Huq S, Bhuiya S, Day M, Fulford-Gardiner M, Clerveaux W (2001) Towards a better understanding of conflict management in tropical fisheries: evidence from Ghana, Bangladesh and the Caribbean. Mar Pol 25:365-376
3. Cihar M, Stankova J (2006) Attitudes of stakeholders towards the Podyii/Thaya River Basin National Park in the Czech Republic. J Env Man 81(3):273-285
4. Clayton S, Brook A (2005) Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 5:87-102
5. Conover M (2002) Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management. Lewis Publishers CRC Press Company Boca Raton Florida, USA
6. Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M (1998) A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8:891-904
7. Etheridge B, Summers RW, Green RE (1997) The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland. J Appl Ecol 34:1081-1105
8. Graham K, Beckerman AP, Thirgood SJ (2005) Human-predator-prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biol Cons 122(2):159-171
9. Maguire LA, Boiney LG (1994) Resolving environmental disputes: a framework incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques. J Env Man 42:31-48
10. Marker LL, Mills MGL, MacDonald DW (2003) Factors influencing perceptions of conflict and tolerance toward cheetahs on Namibian farmlands. Cons Biol 17(5):1290-1298
11. Mascia MB, Brosius JP, Dobson TA, Forbes BC, Horowitz L, McKean MA, Turner NJ (2003) Conservation and the social sciences (Editorial). Cons Biol 17(3):649-650
12. Packer JJ, Birks JDS (1999) An assessment of British farmers' and gamekeepers' experiences, attitudes and practices in relation to the European polecatMustela putorius. Mammal Rev 29(2):75-92
13. Redpath SM (1991) The impact of hen harriers on red grouse breeding success. J Appl Ecol 28:659-671
14. Redpath SM, Thirgood SJ, Leckie FM (2001) Does supplementary feeding reduce predation of red grouse by hen harriers?. J Appl Ecol 38:1157-1168
15. Redpath SM, Arroyo BE, Leckie FM, Bacon P, Bayfield N, Gutiérrez RJ, Thirgood SJ (2004) Using decision modeling with stakeholders to reduce human-wildlife conflict: a Raptor-Grouse case study. Cons Biol 18(2):350-359
16. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Env Sci Pol 7:385-403
17. Schenk A, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2007) Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures - a qualitative study in Switzerland. J Env Man 83(1):66-79
18. Sidaway R (2005) Resolving environmental disputes. From conflict to consensus. Earthscan, London
19. Steinberg S, Bar-On D (2002) An analysis of the group process in encounters between Jews and Palestinians using a typology for discourse classification. Int J Intercultural Rel 26:199-214
20. Stoll-Kleemann S (2001) Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J Env Psychol 21:369-385
21. Thirgood S, Redpath S, Newton I, Hudson P (2000) Raptors and red Grouse: conservation conflicts and management solutions. Cons Biol 14(1):95-104
22. Thirgood SJ, Redpath SM, Campbell S, Smith A (2002) Do habitat characteristics influence predation on red grouse? J Appl Ecol 39(2):217-225
23. Valkama J, Korpimaki E, Arroyo B, Beja P, Bretagnolle V, Bro E, Kenward R, Manosa S, Redpath SM, Thirgood S, Vinuela J (2005) Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review. Biol Rev 80(2):171-203
24. Whitfield DP, McLeod DRA, Watson J, Fielding AH, Haworth PF (2003) The association of grouse moor in Scotland with the illegal use of poisons to control predators. Biol Cons 114:157-163
25. Wittmer H, Rauschmeyer F, Klauer B (2006) How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Pol 23:1-9
26. Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A (2005) People and wildlife: conflict or coexistence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Yasmi Y, Schanz H, Salim A (2006) Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Env Sci Pol 9:538-546
28. Ybarra O, Ramón AC (2004) Diagnosing the difficulty of conflict resolution between individuals from the same and different social groups. J Exp Soc Psych 40:815-822
29. Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, Johnson R, Laczko E, McCracken D, Matouch S, Niemela J, Richards C (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodiv Cons 14:1641-1661