Knowledge and Expertise

Handbook of Applied Cognition, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 83-109

  Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a,c,d   Little, Daniel ^a   Kalish, Michael L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive psychology; Computer simulation; Human processing limitations; Medical diagnosis; Mnemonist

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889449818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470713181.ch4     Document Type: Chapter

References (130)

1. Aleven, V. A. W. M. M. & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bar, M. & Ullman, S. (1996). Spatial context in recognition. Perception, 25, 343-352.
4. Barnett, S. M. & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 237-267.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629-654.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptua. Symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
9. Barsalou, L. W. & Hale, C. R. (1993). Components of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. S. Michalski & P. Theuns (eds.), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis (pp. 97-144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 15, 153-166.
11. Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual structure: determinants of transfer between quantitative domains. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
12. Bédard, J. & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Expertise. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 135-139.
13. Bellenkes, A. H., Wickens, C. D. & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Visual scanning and pilot expertise: the role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviation, Space & Environmental Medicine, 68, 569-579.
14. Bereby-Meyer, Y. & Kaplan, A. (2005). Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 1-22.
15. Berg, G. (1992). Representational adequacy and the case for a hybrid connectionist/marker-parsing model. In R. G. Reilly & N. E. Sharkey (eds.), Connectionist Approaches to Natural Language Processing (pp. 253-272). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Besnard, D. & Cacitti, L. (2005). Interface changes causing accidents: an empirical study of negative transfer. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 105-125.
17. Bitan, T. & Karni, A. (2003). Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 323-337.
18. Brooks, L. R. & Vokey, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 316-323.
19. Burns, B. D. & Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 241-261.
20. Camerer, C. F. & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: how can experts know so much and predict so badly? In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (eds.), Towards a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (pp. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
22. Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W. & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21-29.
23. Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1990). Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems. Memory & Cognition, 18, 593-603.
24. Ceci, S. J., Rosenblum, T. B. & DeBruyn, E. (1999). Laboratory versus field approaches to cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Cognition (pp. 385-408). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Ceci, S. J. & Ruiz, A. (1993). Transfer, abstractness, and intelligence. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction (pp. 168-191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Charness, N. (1991). Expertise in chess: the balance between knowledge and search. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (pp. 39-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Charness, N., Krampe, R. T. & Mayr, U. (1996). The role of practice and coaching in entrepreneurial skill domains: an international comparison of life-span chess skill acquisition. In K. A. Ericsson (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts, Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 51-80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Charness, N. & Schultetus, R. S. (1999). Knowledge and expertise. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, R. W. Schvaneveldt et al. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Cognition (pp. 57-81). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Chase, W. G. & Ericsson, K. A. (1981). Skilled memory. In J. R. Anderson (ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (pp. 141-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
31. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
32. Cormier, S. M. (1987). The structural process underlying transfer of training. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (eds.), Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications (pp. 151-181). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
33. Cromwell, S. E. & Kolb, J. A. (2004). An examination of work-environment support factors affecting transfer of supervisory skills training to the workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 449-471.
34. Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J. & Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy specific nature of improvement: the power law applies by strategy within task. Psychological Science, 9(1), 1-8.
35. Delisle, S., Moulin, B. & Copeck, T. (2003). Surface-marker-based dialog modeling: a progress report on the MAREDI project. Natural Language Engineering, 9, 325-363.
36. Dienes, Z. & Altmann, G. (1998). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: how implicit and how abstract? In D. Berry (ed.), How Implicit is Implicit Learning? (pp. 107-123). London: Oxford University Press.
37. diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age. The Jean Piaget Symposium Series (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M. & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900.
39. Dixon, J. A. & Dohn, M. C. (2003). Redescription disembeds relations: evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1082-1093.
40. Dixon, P. & Gabrys, G. (1991). Learning to operate complex devices: effects of conceptual and operational similarity. Human Factors, 33, 103-120.
41. Dixon, P., Zimmerman, C. & Nearey, S. (1997). Prior experience and complex procedures. Memory & Cognition, 25, 381-394.
42. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Elio, R. & Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20-30.
44. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Memorizers are made, not born. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7. 233-235.
46. Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Recent advances in expertise research: a commentary on the contributions to the special issue. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 233-241.
47. Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G. & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208, 1181-1182.
48. Ericsson, K. A., Delaney, P. F., Weaver, G. A. & Mahadevan, S. (2004). Uncovering the structure of a memorist's superior "basic" memory capacity. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 191-237.
49. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T. & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
50. Ericsson, K. A. & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
51. Ericsson, K. A. & Polson, P. G. (1988). An experimental analysis of the mechanisms of a memory skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 305-316.
52. Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 105-121.
53. Flint, W. (2003). Transfer of learning: evaluating workplace transfer of training techniques. In J. A. Chambers (ed.), Selected Papers from the 14th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (pp. 93-101). Jacksonville, FL: Florida Community College.
54. Frensch, P. A. & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: when is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Freund, H. J. (1983). Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. Physiological Review, 63, 387-436.
56. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 199-241). London: Cambridge University Press.
57. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
58. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
59. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (eds.), Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications (pp. 9-46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60. Glaser, R. (1996). Changing the agency for learning: acquiring expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 303-311). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. (1996). The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving: evidence from grandmaster level chess. Psychological Science, 7, 52-55.
62. Gobet, F. & Waters, A. J. (2003). The role of constraints in xpert memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29, 1082-1094.
63. Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L. & Schevaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253-263.
64. Gott, S. P., Hall, E. P., Pokorny, R. A. et al. (1993). A naturalistic study of transfer: adaptive expertise in technical domains. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction (pp. 258-288). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65. Griffiths, T. L. & Kalish, M. (2002). A multidimensional scaling approach to mental multiplication. Memory and Cognition, 30, 97-106.
66. Griffiths, T. L. & Steyvers, M. (2002). A probabilistic approach to semantic representation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
67. de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.
68. Hayes-Roth, B. (1977). Evolution of cognitive structures and processes. Psychological Review, 84, 260-278.
69. Hershey, D. A. & Walsh, D. A. (2000). Knowledge versus experience in financial problem solving. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning & Personality, 19, 261-291.
70. Hoffman, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In K. B. Laskey & H. Prade (eds.), UAI '99: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, July 30-August 1, 1999. Morgan Kaufmann.
71. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Symbolic connectionism: toward third-generation theories of expertise. In A. Ericsson & J. Smith (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (pp. 301-355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Holyoak, K. J. & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340.
74. Homa, D. (1983). An assessment of two "extraordinary" speed-readers. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 123-126.
75. Johnson, E. J. (1988). Expertise and decisions under uncertainty: performance and process. In M. L. H. Chi, R. Glaser & M. J. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. 209-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
76. Johnson, P. E., Grazioli, S., Jamal, K. & Zualkernan, I. A. (1992). Success and failure in expert reasoning. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 173-203.
77. Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S. & Kruschke, J. K. (2004). Population of linear experts: knoweldge partitioning and function learning. Psychological Review, 111, 1072-1099.
78. Keele, S. W. & Ivry, R. I. (1987). Modular analysis of timing in motor skill. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 183-228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
79. Kimball, D. R. & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). Transfer and expertise. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 109-122). London: Oxford University Press.
80. Kintsch, W. (2000). The control of knowledge activation in discourse comprehension. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (eds.), Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of the 60th Birthday of August Flammer (pp. 137-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Kolers, P. A. (1976). Pattern analyzing memory. Science, 191, 1280-1281.
82. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
83. Lange, T. E. (1992). Hybrid connectionist models: temporary bridges over the gap between the symbolic and the subsymbolic. In J. Dinsmore (ed.), The Symbolic and Connectionist Paradigms: Closing the Gap (pp. 237-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M. & Ngang, S. K. (2002). Simplified learning in complex situations: knowledge partitioning in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 163-193.
85. Lewandowsky, S. & Kirsner, K. (2000). Knowledge partitioning: context-dependent use of expertise. Memory & Cognition, 28, 295-305.
86. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L. & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586-597.
87. Lovett, M. C. & Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving: combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168-217.
88. Lovett, M. C. & Schunn, C. D. (1999). Task representations, strategy variability, and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 107-130.
89. Marchant, G., Robinson, J., Anderson, U. & Schadewald, M. (1991). Analogical transfer and expertise in legal reasoning. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 48, 272-290.
90. Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
91. Medin, D., Ross, B. H. & Markman, A. B. (2001). Cognitive Psychology (3rd edn). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
92. Moray, N. (1999). Mental models in theory and practice. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application. Attention and Performance (pp. 223-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychology Review, 88, 1-15.
94. Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Coblentz, C. K. & Babcook, C. J. (1992). The interdependence of feature and category identification in diagnostic radiology. Memory & Cognition, 20, 344-355.
95. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
96. Novick, L. R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
97. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D. & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street Mathematics and School Mathematics (pp. 77-126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
98. Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R. & Magder, S. (1996). The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic decision-making environments. In A. Ericsson (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games (pp. 127-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
99. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R. & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 164-167.
100. Reason, J. T. (1990). Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Reber, P. J. & Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. Learning and Memory, 1, 217-229.
102. Reder, L. M. & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
103. Richman, H. B., Staszewski, J. J. & Simon, H. A. (1995). Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV. Psychological Review, 102, 305-330.
104. Roediger, H. L. III, Meade, M. L. & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371.
105. Rossano, M. J. (2003). Evolutionary Psychology: The Science of Human Behaviour and Evolution. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
106. Salthouse, T. A. (1984). Effects of age and skill in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 345-371.
107. Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (pp. 286-300). New York: Cambridge University Press.
108. Santtila, P., Korpela, S. & Häkkänen, H. (2004). Expertise and decision-making in linking car crime series. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 97-112.
109. Schliemann, A. D. & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Proportional reasoning in and out of school. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (eds.), Context and Cognition: Ways of Learning and Knowing (pp. 47-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
110. Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R. & Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not calculate: a source activation confusion (SAC) model of problem-familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 3-29.
111. Schwartz, S. & Griffin, T. (1986). Evaluating medical information. In: Medical Thinking. The Psychology of Medical Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 56-96). New York: Springer-Verlag.
112. Shanks, D. R. & Johnstone, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Learning (pp. 533-572). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
114. Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. L. & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75, 1-43.
115. Shrager, J. & Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: a model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405-410.
116. Siegler, R. S. (1987). Some general conclusions about children's strategy choice procedures. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 729-749.
117. Simon, H. A. & Gilmartin, K. J. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29-46.
118. Sims, V. K. & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: the case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97-115.
119. Singley, M. K. & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Transfer of Cognitive Skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Staszewski, J. J. (1993). A theory of skilled memory. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 971-975). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Sternberg, R. J. & Frensch, P. A. (1992). On being an expert: a cost-benefit analysis. In R. Hoffman (ed.), The Cognition of Experts: Psychological Research and Empirical AI (pp. 191-203). New York: Springer-Verlag.
122. Thompson, C. P., Cowan, T. M. & Frieman, J. (1993). Memory Search by a Memorist. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
123. Tirosh, D. & Tsamir, P. (1996). The role of representations in students' intuitive thinking about infinity. Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 27, 33-40.
124. Tuckey, M. R. & Brewer, N. (2003). How schemas affect eyewitness memory over repeated retrieval attempts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 785-800.
125. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W. & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: the Featural and Unitary Semantic System (FUSS) hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488.
126. Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26, 716-730.
127. Woltz, D. J., Gardner, M. K. & Bell, B. G. (2000). Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: strong-but-wrong sequence application. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 601-625.
128. Yang, L-X. & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 663-679.
129. Yang, L-X. & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Knowledge partitioning in categorization: constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1045-1064.
130. Zamani, M. & Richard, J-F. (2000). Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 28, 873-886.