"Lean not on your own understanding": Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 639-661

  Piazza, Jared ^a   Landy, Justin F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Actively open minded thinking; Authority; Conservatism; Deontology; Divine Command Theory; Meta ethics; Moral Foundations Theory; Moral judgment; Religiosity; Utilitarianism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888874456     PISSN: 19302975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., &Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.
2. Alexander, L., & Moore, M. (2008). Deontological ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Standford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http:// plato.standord.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ethicsdeontological.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality". In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
4. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133.
5. Anscombe, E. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philos-ophy, 33, 1-19.
6. Aquinas, St. T. (1947). The summa theologica I-II (Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province). [Benziger Bros. version]. Retrieved from http://dhspriory.org/thomas/summa (Original work published ca. 1273)
7. Baron, J. (2006). Against bioethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Baron, J. (2011, May 23). Belief overkill. Retrieved from http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/baron/talks/overkill.htm
9. Baron, J. (2013, July 2). Moral judgment, CRT, reflection-impulsivity, actively open-minded thinking, and religion. Retrieved from http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/baron/talks/dp13.pdf
10. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2013). Actively open-minded thinking and reflection-impulsivity as alterantives to the sequential two-system theory of the cognitive reflection test and moral judgment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Orga-nizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1-16.
12. Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian response to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154-161.
13. Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (in press). Explaining moral religions. Trends in Cognitive Science.
14. Bonaiuti, E., & La Piana, G. (1917). The genesis of St. Augustine's idea of original sin. The Harvard Theological Review, 10, 159-175.
15. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: Evolutionary ori-gins of religious thought. Basic Books.
16. Brandt, R. (1992). Morality, utilitarianism, and rights. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17. Brandt, R. B. (1998). A theory of the good and the right. New York: Prometheus Books.
18. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113.
19. Eidelman, S., Crandall, C., Goodman, J., & Blanchar, J. (2012). Low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 808-820.
20. Federick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
21. Feinberg, J. (1984). The moral limits of criminal law: Harm to others (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Finnis, J. (1973). The rights and wrongs of abortion: A reply to Judith Thomson. Philosophy&Public Affairs, 2, 117-145.
23. Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Deciding what to do. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Shakaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceeding from the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357-7360.
25. Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339-1366.
26. Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2012). Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 250-256.
27. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150.
28. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
29. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
30. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgement. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
31. Gunton, C. E. (2005). A brief theology of revelation. New York: T&T Clark.
32. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided about politics and religion. New York, NY: Patheon.
33. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Unpublished manuscript. University of Virginia.
34. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
35. Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 188-201.
36. Henningham, J. P. (1996). A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 517-519.
37. Hinze, Y., Doster, J., & Joe, V. C. (1997). The relationship of conservatism and cognitive-complexity. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 22, 297-298.
38. Hunsberger, B. (1992). A short version of the Christian Orthodoxy Scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 360-365.
39. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin and O. P. John (Eds.), Hand-book of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Johnson, D. D. P., & Bering, J. M. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219-233.
41. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
42. Kant, I. (1785/1964). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
43. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
44. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitivedevelopmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and re-search (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
45. Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 279-289.
46. Layman, G. C., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Cultural conflict in American politics: Religious traditionalism, postmaterialism, and U.S. political behavior. Journal of Politics, 59, 751-777.
47. Lewis, C. A., & Maltby, J. (2000). Conservatism and attitude towards Christianity. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 793-798.
48. Lombrozo, T. (2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33, 273-286.
49. Mill, J. S. (1861/1998). Utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Nichols, S. (2004). After objectivity: An empirical study of moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 17, 3-26.
51. Nielsen, K. (1990). Ethics without God (revised ed.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
52. Nucci, L., & Turiel, E. (1993). God's word, religious rules, and their relation to Christian and Jewish children's concept of morality. Child Development, 64, 1475-1491.
53. O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
54. Olson, L. R., & Green, J. C. (2006). The religion gap. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 455-459.
55. Paul, G. (2010). Religiosity tied to socioeconomic status. Science, 327, 642.
56. Paxton, J. M., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 511-527.
57. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 163-177.
58. Pew Research Center (2013, June 11). Gay marriage: Key data points from Pew Research. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/key-data-points/gaymarriage-key-data-points-from-pew-research/.
59. Piazza, J. (2012). "If you love me keep my commandments": Religiosity increases preference for rule-based moral arguments. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 285-302.
60. Piazza, J., Landy, J., & Goodwin, G. (2012). [Attitude towards Religion Scale: Factor structure and internal reliability]. Unpublished raw data. University of Pennsylvania.
61. Piazza, J., Russell, P. S., & Sousa, P. (2013). Moral emotions and the envisaging of mitigating circumstances for wrongdoing. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 707-722.
62. Piazza, J., & Sousa, P. (in press). Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking. So-cial Psychological and Personality Science.
63. Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 375-387.
64. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior ResearchMethods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
65. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon & Schuster.
66. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
67. Rosen, F. (2003). Classical utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. New York, NY: Routledge.
68. Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J.-A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Reli-gion and Spirituality, 1, 14-24.
69. Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Leeman, R. F. (in press). Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context. Cognitive Science.
70. Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PloS One, 7, e39048.
71. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. (2011). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423-428.
72. Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2009a). Consequentialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Standford encyclopedia of philoso-phy. Retrieved from http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/ archives/spr2009/entries/consequentialism.
74. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2009b). Morality: Without God? New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
76. Stellar, J. E., Manzo, V. M., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict response to suffering. Emotion, 12, 449-459.
77. Tanner, C., Medin, D. L., Iliev, R. (2007). Influence of deontological versus consequentialist orientations on act choices and framing effects: When principles are more important than consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 757-769.
78. Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 320-324.
79. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80. Wade, N. (2009). The faith instinct: How religion evolved and why it endures. New York: Penguin