The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas

Cognition

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 154-161

  Bartels, Daniel M ^a   Pizarro, David A ^b  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^b Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Emotions; Ethics; Intuition; Judgment; Machiavellianism; Moral dilemmas; Moral rules; Morality; No Meaning; Psychopathy; Reasoning; Utilitarianism; Values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEONTOLOGY; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACHIAVELLIANISM; MALE; MORALITY; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PHILOSOPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; PSYCHOPATHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL PROBLEM; UTILITARIANISM; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MORALS; PERSONALITY;

EID: 79960908080     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alda, A., et al. (1983). Goodbye, farewell, and amen [Television series episode]. In B. Metcalfe (Producer), midast SH. Los Angeles: 20th Century, Fox Television.
2. Baron J. The effect of normative beliefs on anticipated emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 63:320-330.
3. Baron J., Ritov I. Protected values and omission bias as deontological judgments. Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation 2009, Vol. 50:133-167. Elsevier, San Diego.
4. Baron J., Spranca M. Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 70:1-16.
5. Bartels D.M. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition 2008, 108:381-417.
6. Bauman C.W., Skitka L.J. In the mind of the perceiver: Psychological implications of moral conviction. Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation 2009, Vol. 50:339-359. Elsevier, San Diego.
7. Bazerman M.H., Greene J.D. In favor of clear thinking: Incorporating moral rules into a wise cost-benefit analysis-Commentary on Bennis, Medin, & Bartels (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:209-212.
8. Bennis W.M., Medin D.L., Bartels D.M. The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:187-202.
9. Bennis W.M., Medin D.L., Bartels D.M. Perspectives on the ecology of decision modes: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:213-215.
10. Buckwalter, W., Stich, S. (2010). Gender and philosophical intuition. Available at SSRN: (26.09.10). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1683066.
11. Christie R., Geis F.L. Studies in Machiavellianism 1970, Academic Press, New York.
12. Cima M., Tonnaer F., Hauser M.D. Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2010, 5:59-67.
13. Dolan M.C., Fullam R.S. Moral/conventional transgression distinction and psychopathy in conduct disordered adolescent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences 2010, 49:995-1000.
14. Feltz A., Cokely E.T. The fragmented folk: More evidence of stable individual differences in moral judgments and folk intuitions. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2008, 1771-1776. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
15. Foot P. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review 1967, 5:5-15.
16. Glenn A.L., Koleva S., Iyer R., Graham J., Ditto P.H. Moral identity in psychopathy. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5:497-505.
17. Glenn A.L., Raine A., Schug R.A., Young L., Hauser M. Increased DLPFC activity during moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry 2009, 14:909-911.
18. Greene J.D., Cushman F.A., Stewart L.E., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition 2009, 111(3):364-371.
19. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001, 293:2105-2108.
20. Haidt J., Joseph C. Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 2004, 133:55-66.
21. Iliev R., Sachdeva S., Bartels D.M., Joseph C.M., Suzuki S., Medin D.L. Attending to moral values. Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation 2009, Vol. 50:169-190. Elsevier, San Diego.
22. Kahane G., Shackel N. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?. Nature 2008, 452:7185.
23. Koenigs M., Young L., Adolphs R., Tranel D., Cushman F., Hauser M., et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature 2007, 446:908-911.
24. Kunzendorf, R. G., Maguire, D. (1995). Depression: The reality of 'no meaning' versus the delusion of negative meaning. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
25. Kunzendorf R.G., Moran C., Gray R. Personality traits and reality-testing abilities, controlling for vividness of imagery. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 1995, 15:113-131.
26. Marshall F. Alive [Motion picture] 1993, (Director), Paramount Pictures, United States.
27. Mikhail J. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:143-152.
28. Moore A.B., Clark B.A., Kane M.J. Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science 2008, 19:549-557.
29. Nichols S., Mallon R. Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition 2006, 100:530-542.
30. Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. F., & Hare, R. D. (in press). Manual for the self-report psychopathy scale. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
31. Paulhus D.L., Williams K.M. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 2002, 36:556-563.
32. Pizarro D.A., Uhlmann E. Do normative standards advance our understanding of moral judgment?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005, 28:558-559.
33. Regan T. The case for animal rights 1983, University of California Press, Berkeley.
34. Saver J.L., Damasio A.R. Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:1241-1249.
35. Schwartz B. The limits of cost-benefit calculation: Commentary on Bennis, Medin, & Bartels (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:203-205.
36. Sen A., Williams B. Utilitarianism and beyond 1982, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Skitka L.J., Bauman C.W., Sargis E.G. Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:895-917.
38. Strahan R., Gerbasi K.C. Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1972, 28:191-193.
39. Sunstein C.R. Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005, 28:531-542.
40. Tetlock P.E. Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:320-324.
41. Tetlock P.E., Mitchell G. Situated social identities constrain morally defensible choices: Commentary on Bennis, Medin, & Bartels (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:206-208.
42. Thomson J.J. The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal 1985, 94:1395-1415.
43. Thomson J.J. Rights, restitution, and risk 1986, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Unger P. Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence 1996, Oxford University Press, New York.