Influence of deontological versus consequentialist orientations on act choices and framing effects: When principles are more important than consequences

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 757-769

  Tanner, Carmen ^a   Medin, Douglas L ^b   Iliev, Rumen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49849096379     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.493     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modem moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33, 1-19.
2. Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1-16.
3. Bimbacher, D. (2003). Analytische Einführung in die Ethik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
4. Brandt, R. B. (1992). Morality, utilitarianism, and rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Broad, C. D. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavior sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cummiskey, D. (1996). Kantian consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 71, 355-373.
9. Gert, B. (1973). The moral rules. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Harsanyi, J. (1977). Rule utilitarianism and decision theory. Erkenntnis, 11, 25-53.
11. Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten in 2 Theilen. Königsberg: Nicolovius.
12. Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., & Blair, E. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 382-399.
13. Kühberger, A. (1998). Influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
14. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 76, 149-188.
15. Lichtenstein, S., Gregory, R., & Irwin, J. (2007). What's bad is easy: Taboo values, affect, and cognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 169-188.
16. Nunner-Winkler, G. (1984). Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of rights and justice. In W. M. Kurtines, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behaviour, and moral development (pp. 348-361). New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
17. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 79-94.
18. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
19. Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risk choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057.
20. Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means justify the ends, or do the ends justify the means? A test of the value protection model of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 452-461.
21. Tanner, C., & Medin, D. L. (2004). Protected values: No omission bias and no framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 185-191.
22. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable. Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 853-870.
23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
24. Wang, X. T. (1996). Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 145-157.
25. Waterman, A. S. (1988). On the uses of psychological theory and research in the process of ethical inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 283-298.