Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others?

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 250-256

  Goodwin, Geoffrey P ^a   Darley, John M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Moral disagreement; Moral judgement; Moral objectivity; Morality; Perceived consensus

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655162095     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baumeister R.F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K.D. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 2001, 5:323-370.
2. Beebe, J. R., & Sackris, D. (in preparation). Moral objectivism across the lifespan. Manuscript. University of Buffalo.
3. Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (in preparation). The truth about right and wrong: Predicting moral objectivism with a heritable personality trait. Manuscript.
4. Gert B. Morality: Its nature and justification 2005, Oxford University Press, New York. Rev. ed.
5. Gill M.B. Metaethical variability, incoherence, and error. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity 2008, 2:387-401. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.).
6. Gill M.B. Indeterminacy and variability in meta-ethics. Philosophical Studies 2009, 145:215-234.
7. Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition 2008, 106:1339-1366.
8. Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. The perceived objectivity of ethical beliefs: Psychological findings and implications for public policy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2010, 1:1-28.
9. Haidt J., Rosenberg E., Hom H. Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003, 33:1-36.
10. Haslam S.A., Oakes P.J., McGarty C., Turner J.C., Reynolds K.J., Eggins R.A. Stereotyping and social influence: The mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by views of in-group and out-group members. British Journal of Social Psychology 1996, 35:369-397.
11. Janoff-Bulman, R. (in press). Conscience: The do's and don't of moral regulation. In M. Mikulciner & P. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Janoff-Bulman R., Sheikh S., Hepp S. Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:521-537.
13. Kuhn D., Cheney R., Weinstock M. The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development 2000, 15:309-328.
14. Nichols S., Folds-Bennett T. Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties. Cognition 2003, 90:B23-B32.
15. Puhl R.M., Schwartz M.B., Brownell K.D. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology 2005, 24:517-525.
16. Reed A., Aquino K., Levy E. Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing 2007, 71:178-193.
17. Riskey D.R., Birnbaum M.H. Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don't make up for a wrong. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 103:171-173.
18. Rozin P., Royzman E.B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001, 5:296-320.
19. Sarkissian, H., Park, J., Tien, D., Wright, J. C., & Knobe, J. (in press). Folk moral relativism. Mind and Language.
20. Sechrist G.B., Stangor C. Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:645-654.
21. Sinnott-Armstrong W. Mixed up meta-ethics. Philosophical Studies 2009, 19:235-256.
22. Snare F. The nature of moral thinking 1992, Routledge, London.
23. Stangor C., Sechrist G.B., Jost J.T. Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:486-496.
24. Turiel E. Social regulations and domains of social concepts. Social cognition 1978, Vol. 1:45-74. Gardner, New York. W. Damon (Ed.).
25. Turiel E. The development of social knowledge 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Wainryb C., Shaw L.A., Langley M., Cottam K., Lewis R. Children's thinking about diversity of belief in the early school years: Judgments of relativism, tolerance, and disagreeing persons. Child Development 2004, 75:687-703.
27. Wainryb C., Shaw L.A., Laupa M., Smith K.R. Children's, adolescents', and young adults' thinking about different types of disagreements. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:373-386.
28. Whitney C., Miller C.T. Goal interference, perceived consensus, and preferences for conflict-resolution strategies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002, 32:834-850.
29. Wittenbrink B., Henly J.R. Creating social reality: Informational social influence and the content of stereotypic beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1996, 22:598-610.