Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: How far can we go?

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 692-705

  Jaquiery J ^a,b   Broquet, T ^a,c   Hirzel, A H ^a   Yearsley, J ^a,d   Perrin, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c STATION BIOLOGIQUE DE ROSCOFF   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

barriers; connectivity; dispersal; gene flow; individual based simulations; Landscape genetics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 79551673428     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04966.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abdo Z, Crandall KA, Joyce P, (2004) Evaluating the performance of likelihood methods for detecting population structure and migration. Molecular Ecology, 13, 837-851.
2. Akaike H, (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds, Petrov BN, Csaksi F,), pp. 267-281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
3. Anderson CD, Epperson BK, Fortin MJ, et al. (2010) Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3565-3575.
4. Arens P, van der Sluis T, van't Westende WPC, et al. (2007) Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1489-1500.
5. Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA, et al. (2009a) Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecology, 24, 455-463.
6. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezzani RJ, (2009b) Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography, 32, 818-830.
7. Bertorelle G, Benazzo A, Mona S, (2010) ABC as a flexible framework to estimate demography over space and time: some cons, many pros. Molecular Ecology, 19, 2609-2625.
8. Brown GP, Phillips BL, Webb JK, Shine R, (2006) Toad on the road: use of roads as dispersal corridors by cane toads (Bufo marinus) at an invasion front in tropical Australia. Biological Conservation, 133, 88-94.
9. Cagnacci F, Boitani L, Powell RA, Boyce MS, (2010) Theme Issue 'Challenges and opportunities of using GPS-based location data in animal ecology' Introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 365, 2157-2162.
10. Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, et al. (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2841-2850.
11. Csilléry K, Blum MGB, Gaggiotti OE, Francois O, (2010) Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) in practice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 410-418.
12. Cushman SA, Landguth EL, (2010a) Scale dependent inference in landscape genetics. Landscape Ecology, 25, 967-979.
13. Cushman SA, Landguth EL, (2010b) Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3592-3602.
14. Cushman SA, Lewis JS, (in press) Movement behaviour explains genetic differentiation in American black bears. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1613-1625.
15. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK, (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. American Naturalist, 168, 486-499.
16. Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dale MRT, et al. (2002) A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography, 25, 626-640.
17. Emaresi G, Pellet J, Dubey S, Hirzel AH, Fumagalli L, (in press) Landscape genetics of the Alpine newt (Mesotriton alpestris) inferred from a strip-based approach. Conservation Genetics DOI
18. Epperson BK, McRae BH, Scribner K, et al. (2010) Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3549-3564.
19. Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS, (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 714-724.
20. Ezard THG, Travis JMJ, (2006) The impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic drift and fixation time. Oikos, 114, 367-375.
21. Faubet P, Gaggiotti OE, (2008) A new Bayesian method to identify the environmental factors that influence recent migration. Genetics, 178, 1491-1504.
22. Faubet P, Waples RS, Gaggiotti OE, (2007) Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1149-1166.
23. Frankham R, (1995) Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 29, 305-327.
24. Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, et al. (2005) Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Molecular Ecology, 14, 483-496.
25. Gaines WL, Lyons AL, Lehmkuhl JF, Raedeke KJ, (2005) Landscape evaluation of female black bear habitat effectiveness and capability in the North Cascades, Washington. Biological Conservation, 125, 411-425.
26. Goldberg CS, Waits LP, (2010) Comparative landscape genetics of two pond-breeding amphibian species in a highly modified agricultural landscape. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3650-3663.
27. Goudet J, (2005) FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices. Available at http://www2.unil.ch/ popgen/softwares/fstat. htm, Lausanne.
28. Greenwald KR, Gibbs HL, Waite TA, (2009) Efficacy of land-cover models in predicting isolation of marbled salamander populations in a fragmented landscape. Conservation Biology, 23, 1232-1241.
29. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE, (2004) Metapopulation biology: Past, present, and future. In: Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations (eds., Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE,). pp. 3-22. Elsevier Academic Press, London.
30. Hirzel AH, Nisbet RM, Murdoch WW, (2007) Host-parasitoid spatial dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos, 116, 2082-2096.
31. Holderegger R, Wagner HH, (2006) A brief guide to landscape genetics. Landscape Ecology, 21, 793-796.
32. Holderegger R, Wagner HH, (2008) Landscape genetics. BioScience, 58, 199-207.
33. Johnson CA, (2008) Mammalian dispersal behaviour and its fitness correlates. PhD thesis, University of Guelph.
34. Jombart T, (2010) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.
35. Lande R, (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist, 142, 911-927.
36. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz KS, et al. (2010) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 4179-4191.
37. Lee-Yaw JA, Davidson A, McRae BH, Green DM, (2009) Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Molecular Ecology, 18, 1863-1874.
38. Manel S, Segelbacher G, (2009) Perspectives and challenges in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 18, 1821-1822.
39. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS, (2005) Assignment methods: matching biological questions techniques with appropriate. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 136-142.
40. Manly BGF, (1997) Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
41. Martin J, Nichols JD, Kitchens WM, Hines JE, (2006) Multiscale patterns of movement in fragmented landscapes and consequences on demography of the snail kite in Florida. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 527-539.
42. McDonough C, Paton PWC, (2007) Salamander dispersal across a forested landscape fragmented by a golf course. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1163-1169.
43. McRae BH, (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 60, 1551-1561.
44. McRae BH, Beier P, (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19885-19890.
45. Murphy MA, Evans JS, Cushman SA, Storfer A, (2008) Representing genetic variation as continuous surfaces: an approach for identifying spatial dependency in landscape genetic studies. Ecography, 31, 685-697.
46. Murphy MA, Evans JS, Storfer A, (2010) Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology, 91, 252-261.
47. Nei M, (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292.
48. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara RB, (2007) Vegan: community ecology package version 1.8-6. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/.
49. Perez-Espona S, Perez-Barberia FJ, McLeod JE, et al. (2008) Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Molecular Ecology, 17, 981-996.
50. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
51. Quemere E, Crouau-Roy B, Rabarivola C, Louis EE, Chikhi L, (2010) Landscape genetics of an endangered lemur (Propithecus tattersalli) within its entire fragmented range. Molecular Ecology, 19, 1606-1621.
52. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
53. Ricketts TH, (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist, 158, 87-99.
54. Riley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM, et al. (2006) A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1733-1741.
55. Rouquette JR, Thompson DJ, (2007) Patterns of movement and dispersal in an endangered damselfly and the consequences for its management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 692-701.
56. Rousset F, (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219-1228.
57. Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, et al. (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology, 90, 3222-3232.
58. Segelbacher G, Cushman SA, Epperson BK, et al. (2010) Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges. Conservation Genetics, 11, 375-385.
59. Spear SF, Peterson CR, Matocq MD, Storfer A, (2005) Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum). Molecular Ecology, 14, 2553-2564.
60. Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin MJ, McRae BH, Scribner K, (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3576-3591.
61. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, et al. (2007) Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity, 98, 128-142.
62. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP, (2010) Landscape genetics: where are we now? Molecular Ecology, 19, 3496-3514.
63. Vignieri SN, (2005) Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus). Molecular Ecology, 14, 1925-1937.
64. Vinatier F, Chailleux A, Duyck PF, et al. (2010) Radiotelemetry unravels movements of a walking insect species in heterogeneous environments. Animal Behaviour, 80, 221-229.
65. Vos CC, Antonisse-De Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM, (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity, 86, 598-608.
66. Vuilleumier S, Perrin N, (2006) Effects of cognitive abilities on metapopulation connectivity. Oikos, 113, 139-147.
67. Wang IJ, (2009) Fine-scale population structure in a desert amphibian: landscape genetics of the black toad (Bufo exsul). Molecular Ecology, 18, 3847-3856.
68. ST not equal 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity, 82, 117-125.
69. Wilson GA, Rannala B, (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics, 163, 1177-1191.
70. Zollner PA, (2000) Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 15, 523-533.
71. Zollner PA, Lima SL, (1999) Illumination and the perception of remote habitat patches by white-footed mice. Animal Behaviour, 58, 489-500.