Cross-species comparison using expression data

Introduction to Systems Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 147-159

  Lelandais, Gaëlle ^a   Le Crom, Stéphane ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

cross species comparison; gene ontology; Microarrays; orthologs; paralogs; transcriptome

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888014914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-531-2_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Bernal A, Ear U, Kyrpides N. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): a monitor of genome projects world-wide. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:126-127.
2. Frazer KA, Elnitski L, Church DM, et al. Cross-species sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources. Genome Res 2003;13: 1-12.
3. Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, et al. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995; 270:467-470.
4. Eisen MB, Brown PO. DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression. Methods Enzymol 1999;303:179-205.
5. Zhou XJ, Gibson G. Cross-species comparison of genome-wide expression patterns. Genome Biol 2004;5:232.
6. Marc P, Devaux F, Jacq C. yMGV: a database for visualization and data mining of published genome-wide yeast expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:E63-3.
7. Lelandais G, Marc P, Vincens P, et al. MiCoViTo: a tool for gene-centric comparison and visualization of yeast transcriptome states. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:20.
8. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, et al. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003;302:249-255.
9. Bergmann S, Ihmels J, Barkai N. Similarities and differences in genome-wide expression data of six organisms. PLoS Biol 2004;2:E9.
10. Lefebvre C, Aude JC, Glemet E, et al. Balancing protein similarity and gene co-expression reveals new links between genetic conservation and developmental diversity in invertebrates. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1550-1558.
11. McCarroll SA, Murphy CT, Zou S, et al. Comparing genomic expression patterns across species identifies shared transcriptional profile in aging. Nat Genet 2004;36:197-204.
12. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D. Generalized singular value decomposition for comparative analysis of genome-scale expression data sets of two different organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:3351-3356.
13. Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 2000;102:109-126.
14. Kim SK, Lund J, Kiraly M, et al. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2001;293:2087-2092.
15. Carter DE, Robinson JF, Allister EM, et al. Quality assessment of microarray experiments. Clin Biochem 2005;38:639-642.
16. Jordan BR. How consistent are expression chip platforms? Bioessays 2004; 26:1236-1242.
17. Marshall E. Getting the noise out of gene arrays. Science 2004;306:630-631.
18. Bammler T, Beyer RP, Bhattacharya S, et al. Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms. Nat Methods 2005;2:351-356.
19. Irizarry RA, Warren D, Spencer F, et al. Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms. Nat Methods 2005;2:345-350.
20. Larkin JE, Frank BC, Gavras H, Sultana R, Quackenbush J. Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms. Nat Methods 2005;2:337-344.
21. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001;29:365-371.
22. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, et al. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 2003;423:241-254.
23. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 2004;430:35-44.
24. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol 2001;314: 1041-1052.
25. Fitch WM. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet 2000;16:227-231.
26. Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automated ortholog inference from phylogenetic trees and calculation of orthology reliability. Bioinformatics 2002;18: 92-99.
27. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Jr., Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003;13:2178-2189.
28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
29. O'Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer EL. Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33 Database Issue: D476-D480.
30. Sonnhammer EL, Koonin EV. Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet 2002;18:619-620.
31. He X, Zhang J. Gene complexity and gene duplicability. Curr Biol 2005; 15:1016-1021.
32. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25: 25-29.
33. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D258-261.
34. Ogren PV, Cohen KB, Hunter L. Implications of compositionality in the gene ontology for its curation and usage. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005:174-185.
35. Lewis SE. Gene ontology: looking backwards and forwards. Genome Biol 2005;6:103.
36. Mata J, Lyne R, Burns G, et al. The transcriptional program of meiosis and sporulation in fission yeast. Nat Genet 2002;32:143-147.
37. Chen D, Toone WM, Mata J, et al. Global transcriptional responses of fission yeast to environmental stress. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:214-229.
38. Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 1998;282:699-705.
39. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11: 4241-4257.
40. Mata J, Bahler J. Correlations between gene expression and gene conservation in fission yeast. Genome Res 2003;13:2686-2690.
41. Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, et al. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 2003;4:R28.
42. Lelandais G, Le Crom S, Devaux F, et al. yMGV: a cross-species expression data mining tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32 Database issue:D323-D325.
43. Wood V. Schizosaccharomyces pombe comparative genomics: from sequence to systems. In: Comparative genomics using fungi as models (Sunnerhagen P, Piskur J, eds.), vol. 15, pp. 233-285. New York: Springer; 2006.
44. Gasch AP, Eisen MB. Exploring the conditional coregulation of yeast gene expression through fuzzy k-means clustering. Genome Biol 2002;3: RESEARCH0059.
45. Lelandais G, Vincens A, Badel-Chagnon S, et al. Comparing gene expression networks in a multi-dimensional space to extract similarities and differences between organisms. Bioinformatics 2006;22(11):1359-1366.
46. Enault F, Suhre K, Claverie JM. Phydbac "Gene Function Predictor": a gene annotation tool based on genomic context analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:247.
47. Christie KR, Weng S, Balakrishnan R, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides tools to identify and analyze sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related sequences from other organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32 Database issue:D311-D314.
48. Lang T, Schaeffeler E, Bernreuther D, et al. Aut2p and Aut7p, two novel microtubule-associated proteins are essential for delivery of autophagic vesicles to the vacuole. EMBO J 1998;17:3597-3607.
49. Hertz-Fowler C, Peacock CS, Wood V, et al. GeneDB: a resource for prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32 Database issue: D339-D343.
50. Poirot O, O'Toole E, Notredame C. Tcoffee@igs: A Web server for computing, evaluating and combining multiple sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3503-3506.