Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms

Nature Methods

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 351-356

  Bammler, Theodore ^a   Beyer, Richard P ^a   Bhattacharya, Sanchita ^b   Boorman, Gary A ^c   Boyles, Abee ^d   Bradford, Blair U ^e   Bumgarner, Roger E ^a   Bushel, Pierre R ^f   Chaturvedi, Kabir ^g   Choi, Dongseok ^h   Cunningham, Michael L ^c   Deng, Shibing ^e   Dressman, Holly K ^d   Fannin, Rickie D ^f   Farin, Fredrico M ^a   Freedman, Jonathan H ^d   Fry, Rebecca C ^b   Harper, Angel ^g   Humble, Michael C ^f   Hurban, Patrick ^g   Kavanagh, Terrance J ^a   Kaufmann, William K ^e   Kerr, Kathleen F ^a   Jing, Li ⁱ   Lapidus, Jodi A ^h   Lasarev, Michael R ^h   Li, Jianying ^f   Li, Yi Ju ^d   Lobenhofer, Edward K ^g   Lu, Xinfang ^j   Malek, Renae L ^k   Milton, Sean ^b   Nagalla, Srinivasa R ^j   O'Malley, Jean P ^j   Palmer, Valerie S ^h   Pattee, Patrick ^j   Paules, Richard S ^f   Perou, Charles M ^e   Phillips, Ken ^g   Qin, Li Xuan ^a   Qiu, Yang ^g   Quigley, Sean D ^a   Rodland, Matthew ^j   Rusyn, Ivan ^e   Samson, Leona D ^b   Schwartz, David A ^d   Shi, Yan ^e   Shin, Jung Lim ⁱ   Sieber, Stella O ^f   Slifer, Susan ^d   Speer, Marcy C ^d   Spencer, Peter S ^h   Sproles, Dean I ^h   Swenberg, James A ^e   Suk, William A ^f   Sullivan, Robert C ⁱ   Tian, Ru ^e   Tennant, Raymond W ^f   Todd, Signe A ^j   Tucker, Charles J ^f   Van Houten, Bennett ^f   Weis, Brenda K ^f   Xuan, Shirley ^b   Zarbl, Helmut ⁱ   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^g Oregon Health and Science University ^*  (United States)

^h OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^j OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LABORATORY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LABORATORIES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 18244389201     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/NMETH754     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Quackenbush,J. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 418-427 (2001).
2. Salter, A.H. & Nilsson, K.C. Informatics and multivariate analysis of toxicogenomics data. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 6, 117-122 (2003).
3. Nadon, R & Shoemaker, J. Statistical issues with microarrays: Processing and analysis. Trends Genet. 18, 265-271 (2002).
4. Spruill, S.E., Lu, J., Hardy, S. & Weir, B. Assessing sources of variability in microarray gene expression data. Biotechniques 33, 916-923 (2002).
5. Tan, P.K. et al. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5676-5684 (2003).
6. Yang, Y.H. & Speed, T. Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 579-588 (2002).
7. Marshall, E. Getting the noise out of gene arrays. Science 306 630-631 (2004)
8. Becker, K.G. The sharing of cDNA microarray data. Nat. Rev. Neuroscie. 2, 438-440 (2001).
9. Miles, M.F. Microarrays: Lost in storm of data. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 440-443 (2001).
10. Ball, C.A. et al. Standards for microarray data. Science 298, 539 (2002).
11. Campbell. P. Microarray standards at last. Nature 418, 323 (2002).
12. Kim, H. et al. Use of RNA and genomic DNA references for inferred comparisons in DNA microarray analyses. Biotechniques 33, 924-930 (2002).
13. Eisen, M.B. & Brown, P.O. DNA arrays for analysis of gene expresion. Methods Enzymol. 303, 179-205 (1999).
14. Cronin, M, et al. Universal RNA reference material for gene expression. Clin. Chem. 50, 1464-1471 (2004).
15. Kerr, M.K. & Churchill, G.A. Experimental design for gene expression microaarays. Biostatistics 2, 183-201 (2001).
16. Kerr, M.K. Experimental design to make the most of microarray results. Methods Mol. Biol. 224, 137-147 (2003).
17. Irizarry, R.A. et al. Summaries of affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e15 (2003).
18. Wolfinger, R. et al. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J. Comput. Biol. 8 625-637 (2001).
19. Hosack, D.A., Dennis, G., Sherman, B.T., Lane, H.C. & Lempicki, R.A. Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol. 4, R60 (2003).
20. Hyduke, D.R., Rohlin L., Kao, K.C. & Liao, J,C. A software package for cDNA microarray normalization and assessing confidence intervals. OMICS 7, 227-234 (2003).
21. Tseng, G.C., Oh, M.K., Rohlin, L., Liao, J.C. & Wong, W.H. Issues in cDNA microrray Analysis: Quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2549-2557 (2001).
22. Benjamini, Y, & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A powerful approach to multiple testing. J.R. Stat. Soc. (Ser A) 57, 289 (1995).