Cross-sectional study: Does combining optical coherence tomography measurements using the 'Random Forest' decision tree classifier improve the prediction of the presence of perimetric deterioration in glaucoma suspects?

BMJ Open

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Sugimoto, Koichiro ^a   Murata, Hiroshi ^a   Hirasawa, Hiroyo ^a   Aihara, Makoto ^a,b   Mayama, Chihiro ^a   Asaoka, Ryo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b Shirato Eye Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION TREE; DETERIORATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMPHREY PERIMETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION; RANDOM FOREST; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; RETINA NERVE CELL; RETINAL THICKNESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 84887944332     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003114     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, et al. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 1992;99:19-28.
2. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:77-83.
3. Chang R, Budenz DL. New developments in optical coherence tomography for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:127-35. (Pubitemid 351322815)
4. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178-81. (Pubitemid 21917444)
5. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:453-64.
6. Nakano N, Ikeda HO, Hangai M, et al. Longitudinal and simultaneous imaging of retinal ganglion cells and inner retinal layers in a mouse model of glaucoma induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:8754-62.
7. Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S, et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6401-7.
8. Garas A, Vargha P, Hollo G. Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fibre layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma. Eye 2011;25:57-65.
9. Kim NR, Lee ES, Seong GJ, et al. Structure-function relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using Fourier-domain OCT in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4646-51.
10. Moreno PA, Konno B, Lima VC, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for early glaucoma assessment: analysis of macular ganglion cell complex versus peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Can J Ophthalmol 2011;46:543-7.
11. Rao HL, Babu JG, Addepalli UK, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer and macular inner retina measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in Indian eyes with early glaucoma. Eye 2012;26:133-9.
12. Rao HL, Kumbar T, Addepalli UK, et al. Effect of spectrum bias on the diagnostic accuracy of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:1058-65.
13. Schulze A, Lamparter J, Pfeiffer N, et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1039-45.
14. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2305-14. e1-2.
15. Tuulonen A, Lehtola J, Airaksinen PJ. Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality? Ophthalmology 1993;100:587-97; discussion 97-8.
16. Leung CK, Choi N, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: pattern of RNFL defects in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2337-44.
17. Cordeiro DV, Lima VC, Castro DP, et al. Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma. Clini Ophthalmol 2011;5:1333-7.
18. Shoji T, Nagaoka Y, Sato H, et al. Impact of high myopia on the performance of SD-OCT parameters to detect glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:1843-9.
19. Baskaran M, Ong EL, Li JL, et al. Classification algorithms enhance the discrimination of glaucoma from normal eyes using high-definition optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:2314-20.
20. Mitchell T. Machine learning. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1997.
21. Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Kneib T, et al. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:307.
22. Cvenkel B, Kontestabile AS. Correlation between nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain OCT and visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:575-84.
23. Jeoung JW, Park KH. Comparison of Cirrus OCT and Stratus OCT on the ability to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:938-45.
24. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2201-4. (Pubitemid 30450993)
25. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-20. discussion 829-30.
26. Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001;45:5-32. (Pubitemid 32933532)
27. Breiman L, Cutler A. Random Forests. 2004. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/? breiman/RandomForests/cc-home.htm
28. Dietterich TG. Ensemble learning. In: The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. 2nd edn. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.
29. Palmer DS, O'Boyle NM, Glen RC, et al. Random forest models to predict aqueous solubility. J Chem Inf Model 2007;47:150-8. (Pubitemid 46225571)
30. Wu B, Abbott T, Fishman D, et al. Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1636-43. (Pubitemid 37121151)
31. Diaz-Uriarte R, Alvarez de Andres S. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:3.
32. Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, et al. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003;43:1947-58.
33. Gini C. 1909 Concentration and dependency ratios (in Italian). Riv Pol Econ 1997;87:769-89.
34. Fang Y, Pan YZ, Li M, et al. Diagnostic capability of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography in early primary open angle glaucoma. Chin Med J 2010;123:2045-50.
35. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Chu T, et al . Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4147-52. (Pubitemid 44264616)
36. Lu AT, Wang M, Varma R, et al. Combining nerve fiber layer parameters to optimize glaucoma diagnosis with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1352-7, 57e1-2.
37. Chen HY, Huang ML, Hung PT. Logistic regression analysis for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:527-34.
38. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer, 2001.
39. Morooka S, Hangai M, Nukada M, et al. Wide 3-dimensional macular ganglion cell complex imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4805-12.
40. Lisboa R, Leite MT, Zangwill LM, et al. Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2012.
41. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1692-9, 99e1.
42. Hart WM Jr, Becker B. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology 1982;89:268-79. (Pubitemid 12143090)
43. Heijl A, Lundqvist L. The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol 1984;62:658-64. (Pubitemid 14057306)
44. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, et al. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1809-15.
45. Lee JY, Hwang YH, Lee SM, et al . Age and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012;26:163-8.
46. Parikh RS, Parikh SR, Sekhar GC, et al. Normal age-related decay of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology 2007;114:921-6. (Pubitemid 46635861)
47. Feuer WJ, Budenz DL, Anderson DR, et al. Topographic differences in the age-related changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer of normal eyes measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2011;20:133-8.
48. Knight OJ, Girkin CA, Budenz DL, et al. Effect of race, age, and axial length on optic nerve head parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD-OCT. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:312-18.
49. Ooto S, Hangai M, Tomidokoro A, et al . Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:8769-79.
50. Kang SH, Hong SW, Im SK, et al. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4075-83.
51. Zou H, Zhang X, Xu X, et al. Quantitative in vivo retinal thickness measurement in chinese healthy subjects with retinal thickness analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:341-7. (Pubitemid 46780834)
52. Chan CM, Yu JH, Chen LJ, et al. Posterior pole retinal thickness measurements by the retinal thickness analyzer in healthy Chinese subjects. Retina 2006;26:176 -81.
53. Hoh ST, Lim MC, Seah SK, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness variations with myopia. Ophthalmology 2006;113:773-7. (Pubitemid 44294302)
54. Maroco J, Silva D, Rodrigues A, et al. Data mining methods in the prediction of Dementia: A real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:299.
55. Douglas PK, Harris S, Yuille A, et al. Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs disbelief. NeuroImage 2011;56:544-53.