Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Rao, Harsha L ^a,b   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Alencar, Luciana M ^a,c   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRUM; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 77956343481     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. F.A. Medeiros, L.M. Zangwill, and C. Bowd Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography Am J Ophthalmol 139 2005 44 55
2. G. Wollstein, H. Ishikawa, and J. Wang Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage Am J Ophthalmol 139 2005 39 43
3. A. Manassakorn, K. Nouri-Mahdavi, and J. Caprioli Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disk algorithms with optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 141 2006 105 115
4. J.L. Hougaard, A. Heijl, and B. Bengtsson Glaucoma detection by Stratus OCT J Glaucoma 16 2007 302 306
5. P. Naithani, R. Sihota, and P. Sony Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 2007 3138 3145
6. R.S. Parikh, S. Parikh, and G.C. Sekhar Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma Ophthalmology 114 2007 2238 2243
7. K. Nouri-Mahdavi, K. Nikkhou, and D.C. Hoffman Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT) J Glaucoma 17 2008 183 188
8. G. Wollstein, J.S. Schuman, and L.L. Price Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 123 2005 464 470
9. E.J. Lee, T.W. Kim, and K.H. Park Ability of Stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2009 662 668
10. F.A. Medeiros, L.M. Zangwill, and L.M. Alencar Detection of glaucoma progression with Stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head and macular thickness measurements Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2009 5741 5748
11. N. Nassif, B. Cense, and B. park In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve Opt Express 12 2004 367 376 [serial online] http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-3-367 Accessed December 20, 2009
12. M. Wojtkowski, V. Srinivasan, and T. Ko Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation Opt Express 12 2004 2404 2422 [serial online] http://www. opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-11-2404 Accessed December 20, 2009
13. M. Sehi, D.S. Grewal, C.W. Sheets, and D.S. Greenfield Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection Am J Ophthalmol 148 2009 597 605
14. M.S. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 130 167 Oxford Statistical Science Series. vol 28
15. X.H. Zhou, N.A. Obuchowski, and D.K. McClish Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine 2002 Wiley-Interscience New York 274 306 Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
16. R.J. Glynn, and B. Rosner Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis Arch Ophthalmol 110 1992 381 387
17. T.A. Alonzo, and M.S. Pepe Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques Biostatistics 3 2002 421 432
18. C.A. Girkin, G. McGwin Jr, and C. Long Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 2004 2272 2278
19. J.R. Zelefsky, N. Harizman, and R. Mora Assessment of a race-specific normative HRT-III database to differentiate glaucomatous from normal eyes J Glaucoma 15 2006 548 551
20. J.E. De Leon-Ortega, L.M. Sakata, and B.E. Monheit Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes Am J Ophthalmol 144 2007 525 532
21. F.A. Medeiros, G. Vizzeri, and L.M. Zangwill Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease Ophthalmology 115 2008 1340 1346
22. O. Tan, V. Chopra, and A.T. Lu Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography Ophthalmology 116 2009 2305 2314
23. R. Jaeschke, G. Guyatt, D.L. Sackett Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 271 1994 389 391
24. Y.T. van der Schouw, A.L. Verbeek, and S.H. Ruijs Guidelines for the assessment of new diagnostic tests Invest Radiol 30 1995 334 340
25. F.A. Medeiros How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? Br J Ophthalmol 91 2007 273 274
26. F.A. Medeiros, D. Ng, and L.M. Zangwill The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 2007 214 222
27. J.G. Lijmer, B.W. Mol, and S. Heisterkamp Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests JAMA 282 1999 1061 1066
28. G. Mowatt, J.M. Burr, J.A. Cook OAG Screening Project Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 5373 5385
29. J. Zhang, H. Quan, J. Ng, and M.E. Stepanavage Some statistical methods for multiple endpoints in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 18 1997 204 221
30. D.A. Savitz, and A.F. Olshan Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data Am J Epidemiol 142 1995 904 908
31. A.J. Sankoh, M.F. Huque, and S.D. Dubey Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials Stat Med 16 1997 2529 2542
32. T.V. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments BMJ 316 1998 1236 1238
33. K.J. Rothman No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons Epidemiology 1 1990 43 46