Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 8769-8779

  Ooto, Sotaro ^a   Hangai, Masanori ^a   Tomidokoro, Atsuo ^b   Saito, Hitomi ^b   Araie, Makoto ^b   Otani, Tomohiro ^c   Kishi, Shoji ^c   Matsushita, Kenji ^d   Maeda, Naoyuki ^d   Shirakashi, Motohiro ^e   Abe, Haruki ^e   Ohkubo, Shinji ^f   Sugiyama, Kazuhisa ^f   Iwase, Aiko ^g   Yoshimura, Nagahisa ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^f KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^g Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; RETINA OUTER MOLECULAR LAYER; RETINA OUTER NUCLEAR LAYER; RETINA PHOTORECEPTOR INNER SEGMENT; RETINA PHOTORECEPTOR OUTER SEGMENT; RETINAL LAYER THICKNESS; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VARIABILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ALGORITHM; ASIAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SEX DIFFERENCE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855405445     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8388     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Chan A, Duker JS, Ishikawa H, et al. Quantification of photoreceptor layer thickness in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2006;26:655-660.
2. Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, et al. Ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography assessment of photoreceptors in retinitis pigmentosa and related diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142: 945-952.
3. Matsumoto H, Sato T, Kishi S. Outer nuclear layer thickness at the fovea determines visual outcomes in resolved central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:105-110.
4. Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, et al. High-resolution imaging of resolved central serous chorioretinopathy using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1800-1809.
5. Ooto S, Tsujikawa A, Mori S, et al. Thickness of photoreceptor layers in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248: 1077-1086.
6. Arichika S, Hangai M, Yoshimura N. Correlation between thickening of the inner and outer retina and visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membrane. Retina. 2010;30:503-508.
7. Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, et al. High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 873-881.
8. Tan O, Li G, Lu AT, et al. Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:949-956.
9. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2305-2314.
10. van Dijk HW, Verbraak FD, Kok PH, et al. Decreased retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3660-3665.
11. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4893-4897.
12. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3432-3437.
13. Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z, et al. Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes with time-domain and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2009;29:980-987.
14. Kakinoki M, Sawada O, Sawada T, et al. Comparison of macular thickness between Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:135-140.
15. Sull AC, Vuong LN, Price LL, et al. Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness. Retina. 2010;30:235-245.
16. Alamouti B, Funk J. Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:899-901.
17. Chan A, Duker JS, Ko TH, et al. Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:193-198.
18. Lim MC, Hoh ST, Foster PJ, et al. Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:974-978.
19. Lam DS, Leung KS, Mohamed S, et al. Regional variations in the relationship between macular thickness measurements and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:376-382.
20. Kelty PJ, Payne JF, Trivedi RH, et al. Macular thickness assessment in healthy eyes based on ethnicity using Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 2668-2672.
21. Eriksson U, Alm A. Macular thickness decreases with age in normal eyes: a study on the macular thickness map protocol in the Stratus OCT. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1448-1452.
22. Sung KR, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Effects of age on optical coherence tomography measurements of healthy retinal nerve fiber layer, macula, and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1119-1124.
23. Legarreta JE, Gregori G, Punjabi OS, et al. Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39:S43-S49.
24. Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV. Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148: 266-271.
25. Song WK, Lee SC, Lee ES, et al. Macular thickness variations with sex, age, and axial length in healthy subjects: a spectral domainoptical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3913-3918.
26. Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV. Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2644-2647.
27. Forte R, Cennamo GL, Finelli ML, de Crecchio G. Comparison of time domain Stratus OCT and spectral domain SLO/OCT for assessment of macular thickness and volume. Eye (Lond). 2009;23: 2071-2078.
28. Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, et al. Three-dimensional profile of macular retinal thickness in normal Japanese eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:465-473.
29. Yang Q, Reisman CA, Wang Z, et al. Automated layer segmentation of macular OCT images using dual-scale gradient information. Opt Express. 2010;18:21293-21307.
30. Guo L, Normando EM, Nizari S, Lara D, Cordeiro MF. Tracking longitudinal retinal changes in experimental ocular hypertension using the cSLO and spectral domain-OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6504-6513.
31. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Interpretation of a single field. In: Anderson DR, Patella VM, eds. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:121-190.
32. Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF. Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:361-367.
33. Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2012-2017.
34. Christensen UC, Kroyer K, Thomadsen J, et al. Normative data of outer photoreceptor layer thickness obtained by software image enhancing based on Stratus optical coherence tomography images. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:800-805.
35. Bagci AM, Shahidi M, Ansari R, et al. Thickness profiles of retinal layers by optical coherence tomography image segmentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:679-687.
36. Loduca AL, Zhang C, Zelkha R, Shahidi M. Thickness mapping of retinal layers by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:849-855.
37. Kotera Y, Hangai M, Hirose F, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of macular inner structures in glaucoma by using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:1412-1421.
38. Leung CK, Chan WM, Yung WH, et al. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 391-400.
39. Lujan BJ, Roorda A, Knighton RW, Carroll J. Revealing Henle's fiber layer using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1486-1492.
40. Otani T, Yamaguchi Y, Kishi S. Improved visualization of Henle fiber layer by changing the measurement beam angle on optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2011;31:497-501.
41. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300:5-25.
42. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:741-748.
43. Repka MX, Quigley HA. The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96:26-32.
44. Parikh RS, Parikh SR, Sekhar GC, et al. Normal age-related decay of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:921-926.
45. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Stratus OCT. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1046-1052.
46. Hirasawa H, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in ophthalmologically normal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:1420-1426.
47. Curcio CA, Millican CL, Allen KA, Kalina RE. Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3278-3296.
48. Zou H, Zhang X, Xu X, Yu S. Quantitative in vivo retinal thickness measurement in Chinese healthy subjects with retinal thickness analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:341-347.
49. Chan CM, Yu JH, Chen LJ, et al. Posterior pole retinal thickness measurements by the retinal thickness analyzer in healthy Chinese subjects. Retina. 2006;26:176-181.
50. Leung CK, Mohamed S, Leung KS, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5171-5176.
51. Nagai-Kusuhara A, Nakamura M, Fujioka M, et al. Association of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography with disc size and axial length. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:186-190.
52. Hoh ST, Lim MC, Seah SK, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness variations with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113: 773-777.
53. Matsumoto H, Kishi S, Otani T, Sato T. Elongation of photoreceptor outer segment in central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:162-168.