Combining Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters to Optimize Glaucoma Diagnosis with Optical Coherence Tomography

Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Lu, Ake Tzu Hui ^a   Wang, Mingwu ^a   Varma, Rohit ^a   Schuman, Joel S ^b   Greenfield, David S ^c   Smith, Scott D ^d   Huang, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; AUSTRALIA; CATARACT; CLINICAL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MYOPIA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION INDEX; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVOR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 48149083637     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Quigley H.A., Addicks E.M., and Green W.R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 100 (1982) 135-146
2. Mikelberg F.S., Yidegiligne H.M., and Schulzer M. Optic nerve axon count and axon diameter in patients with ocular hypertension and normal visual fields. Ophthalmology 102 (1995) 342-348
3. Nicolela M.T., Martinez-Bello C., Morrison C.A., et al. Scanning laser polarimetry in a selected group of patients with glaucoma and normal controls. Am J Ophthalmol 132 (2001) 845-854
4. Huang D., Swanson E.A., Lin C.P., et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 254 (1991) 1178-1181
5. Chauhan B.C., Blanchard J.W., Hamilton D.C., and LeBlanc R.P. Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 775-782
6. Choplin N.T., Lundy D.C., and Dreher A.W. Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 2068-2076
7. Blumenthal E.Z., Williams J.M., Weinreb R.N., et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2278-2282
8. Budenz D.L., Chang R.T., Huang X., et al. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 2440-2443
9. Paunescu L.A., Schuman J.S., Price L.L., et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 1716-1724
10. Leung C.K., Chan W.M., Yung W.H., et al. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma. An optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 391-400
11. Budenz D.L., Michael A., Chang R.T., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 3-9
12. Burgansky-Eliash Z., Wollstein G., Chu T., et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4147-4152
13. Guedes V., Schuman J.S., Hertzmark E., et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 177-189
14. Sihota R., Sony P., Gupta V., et al. Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 408-415
15. Williams Z.Y., Schuman J.S., Gamell L., et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of nerve fiber layer thickness and the likelihood of a visual field defect. Am J Ophthalmol 134 (2002) 538-546
16. Wollstein G., Schuman J.S., Price L.L., et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and automated visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 138 (2004) 218-225
17. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 139 (2005) 44-55
18. Schuman J.S., Hee M.R., Arya A.V., et al. Optical coherence tomography: a new tool for glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 6 (1995) 89-95
19. Chen H.Y., and Huang M.L. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography in Taiwan Chinese subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 894-902
20. Huang M.L., and Chen H.Y. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using stratus optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4121-4129
21. Nouri-Mahdavi K., Hoffman D., Tannenbaum D.P., et al. Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 137 (2004) 228-235
22. Mabuchi F., Aihara M., Mackey M.R., et al. Regional optic nerve damage in experimental mouse glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 4352-4358
23. Jonas J.B., Bergua A., Schmitz-Valckenberg P., et al. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 1764-1773
24. Jonas J.B., Fernandez M.C., and Sturmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 63-68
25. Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1986) 13-22
26. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (1980) 817-830
27. Williams R.L. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 56 (2000) 645-646
28. Obuchowski N.A. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 53 (1997) 567-578
29. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., and Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 837-845
30. Rao J.N., and Scott A.J. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 48 (1992) 577-585
31. Horn F.K., Mardin C.Y., Viestenz A., and Junemann A.G. Association between localized visual field losses and thickness deviation of the nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 419-425
32. Colen T.P., Tang N.E., Mulder P.G., and Lemij H.G. Sensitivity and specificity of new GDx parameters. J Glaucoma 13 (2004) 28-33
33. Essock E.A., Sinai M.J., Bowd C., et al. Fourier analysis of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 1238-1245
34. Ford B.A., Artes P.H., McCormick T.A., et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1145-1150
35. Nakatsue T., Shirakashi M., Yaoeda K., et al. Optic disc topography as measured by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and visual field loss in Japanese patients with primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma 13 (2004) 291-298
36. Kiriyama N., Ando A., Fukui C., et al. A comparison of optic disc topographic parameters in patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241 (2003) 541-545
37. Munkwitz S., Funk J., Loeffler K.U., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry using the GDx. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 1142-1145
38. Reus N.J., and Lemij H.G. Relationships between Standard Automated Perimetry, HRT Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy, and GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4182-4188
39. Zangwill L.M., Chan K., Bowd C., et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3144-3151
40. Roth V., and Steinhage V. Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis Using Kernel Functions (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 568-574
41. Tipping M.E. The relevance vector machine. In: Solla S.A., Leen T.K., and Müller K.-R. (Eds). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 652-658
42. Boser B.E., Guyon I.M., and Vapnik V.N. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers (1992), ACM Press, Pittsburgh 144-152 In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory.
43. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (1996), Springer-Verlag, New York 138-145