Retinal nerve fiber layer and macular inner retina measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in Indian eyes with early glaucoma

Eye

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 133-139

  Rao, H L ^a   Babu, J G ^a   Addepalli, U K ^a   Senthil, S ^a   Garudadri, C S ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

diagnostic accuracy; ganglion cell complex; retinal nerve fiber layer; spectral domain OCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INDIAN; MACULAR INNER RETINA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; NERVE CELL; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PARAMETERS; PERIMETRY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA; RETINA NERVE FIBER LAYER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 84855854033     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.277     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna Jr R, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 44-55. (Pubitemid 40094839)
2. Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, Beaton SA, Schuman JS. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 39-43. (Pubitemid 40094838)
3. Hougaard JL, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Glaucoma detection by Stratus OCT. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 302-306. (Pubitemid 46626056)
4. Parikh RS, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, Kumar RS, Prabakaran S, Babu JG et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 2238-2243. (Pubitemid 350181104)
5. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nikkhou K, Hoffman DC, Law SK, Caprioli J. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT). J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 183-188. (Pubitemid 351543541)
6. Nassif N, Cense B, Park B, Pierce M, Yun S, Bouma B et al. In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Opt Express 2004; 12: 367-376.
7. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Ko T, Fujimoto J, Kowalczyk A, Duker J. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express 2004; 12: 2404-2422.
8. Zeimer R, Asrani S, Zou S, Quigley H, Jampel H. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 224-231. (Pubitemid 28090824)
9. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990; 300: 5-25. (Pubitemid 20349476)
10. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2305-2314, e2301-2302.
11. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1692-1699, 1699, e1691.
12. Mori S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, Yoshimura N. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurement of macular volume for diagnosing glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2010; 19: 528-534.
13. Garas A, Vargha P, Hollo G Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fibre layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 57-65.
14. Schulze A, Lamparter J, Pfeiffer N, Berisha F, Schmidtmann I, Hoffmann EM. Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1039-1045.
15. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1008-1015. (Pubitemid 46768333)
16. Garudadri CS, Rao HL, Parikh RS, Jonnadula GB, Selvaraj P, Nutheti R et al. Effect of Optic Disc Size and Disease Severity on the Diagnostic Capability of Glaucoma Imaging Technologies in an Indian Population. J Glaucoma 2011; e-pub ahead of print 25 April 2011; doi:10.1097/ IJG.0b013e31821829f1.
17. Rao HL, Leite MT, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM, Sample PA et al. Effect of disease severity and optic disc size on diagnostic accuracy of RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1290-1296.
18. Seong M, Sung KR, Choi EH, Kang SY, Cho JW, Um TW et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1446-1452.
19. Hodapp E PR, Anderson DR (eds). Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis, 1993; pp 53.
20. Zhou X-H ON McClish DK. Analysis of correlated ROC data. In: Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK (eds). Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 2002; pp 274-306.
21. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. Biostatistics 2002; 3: 421-432. (Pubitemid 35015933)
22. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 703-707. (Pubitemid 24061707)
23. Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 689-693. (Pubitemid 16035489)
24. Fagan TJ. Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 257.
25. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 763-770.
26. Langlotz CP. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology 2003; 228: 3-9. (Pubitemid 36736061)
27. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 827-837. (Pubitemid 38736241)
28. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, Ernstrom KB, Bowd C, Medeiros FA et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2653-2660. (Pubitemid 351261217)
29. Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Mesiwala N, Kao A, Lin S. Diagnostic Power of Optic Disc Morphology, Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, and Macular Inner Retinal Layer Thickness in Glaucoma Diagnosis With Fourier-domain Optical Coherence Tomography J Glaucoma 2011; 20: 87-95.
30. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282: 1061-1066. (Pubitemid 29436454)
31. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 214-222. (Pubitemid 47251405)