Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1333-1337

  Cordeiro, Daniela Valença ^a   Lima, Verônica Castro ^a,b   Castro, Dinorah P ^a,c   Castro, Leonardo C ^a,c   Pacheco, Maria Angélica ^b   Lee, Jae Min ^b   Dimantas, Marcelo I ^b   Prata, Tiago Santos ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Hospital Medicina dos Olhos   (Brazil)

^c Centro Brasileiro de Especialidades Oftalmológicas   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ganglion cell complex; Glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal nerve fiber layer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MACULAR GANGLION CELL COMPLEX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; OPTIC DISC SIZE; OPTIC DISK; PERIPAPILLARY RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS;

EID: 81055144808     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparision of the GDxVCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(6):827-837.
2. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Feletti Ml. Comparison between GDxVcc scanning laser polarimetry and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph in the diagnosis of chronic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84(5):650-655.
3. Savini G, Zanini M, Carelli V, Saden AA, Ross-Cisneros FN, Barboni P. Correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head size: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(4):489-492.
4. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):1008-1015.
5. Leung CK, Chan WM, Yung WH, et al. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(3):391-400.
6. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, Seya R, Maeda H, Negi A. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(4):513-520.
7. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178-1181.
8. Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and automated visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):218-225.
9. Lederer DE, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, et al. Analysis of macular volume in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(6):838-843.
10. Wojtkowski M, Kowalczyk A, Leitgeb R, Fercher AF. Full range complex spectral optical coherence tomography technique in eye imaging. Opt Lett. 2002;27(16):1415-1417.
11. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2003;28(21): 2067-2069.
12. Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(12):1715-1720.
13. Seong M, Sung KR, Choi EH, et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1446-1552.
14. Garas A, Vargha P, Holló G. Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fiber layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(1):57-65.
15. Kim NR, Lee ES, Seong GJ, Kim JH, An HG, Kim CY. Structurefunction relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using Fourier-domain OCT in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4646-4651.
16. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2305-2314.
17. Pepe MS. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics. 1998;54(1):124-135.
18. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Weinreb RN. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(6):2520-2527.
19. Rao HL, Leite MT, Weinreb RN, et al. Effect of disease severity and optic disc size on diagnostic accuracy of RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1290-1296.