Ultrasound assisted particle and cell manipulation on-chip

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volumn 65, Issue 11-12, 2013, Pages 1600-1610

  Mulvana, Helen ^a   Cochran, Sandy ^b   Hill, Martyn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acoustic streaming; Acoustofluidics; Lab on chip; Microfluidics; Ultrasonic radiation forces

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTOFLUIDICS; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; EMERGING APPLICATIONS; LAB-ON-CHIP; MICRON-SCALE PARTICLES; PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES; ULTRASONIC MANIPULATION; ULTRASONIC RADIATION FORCE;

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; MICROFLUIDICS;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

LIPOSOME;

CALCULATION; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL SURFACE; CELL VIABILITY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG TRANSPORT; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; LAB ON A CHIP; MATERIAL STATE; MICROBUBBLE; MICROFLUIDICS; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ULTRASOUND; VISCOSITY;

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; ACOUSTOFLUIDICS; LAB-ON-CHIP; MICROFLUIDICS; ULTRASONIC RADIATION FORCES;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MICROBUBBLES; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MICROFLUIDICS; PARTICLE SIZE; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84887617989     PISSN: 0169409X     EISSN: 18728294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.016     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. Wu J., Nyborg W.L.M. Emerging Therapeutic Ultrasound 2006, World Scientific, Hackensack, N.J.
2. Lenshof A., Magnusson C., Laurell T. Acoustofluidics 8: applications of acoustophoresis in continuous flow microsystems. Lab Chip 2012, 12:1210-1223.
3. Neppiras E.A. Acoustic cavitation. Phys. Rep. 1980, 61:159-251.
4. Manasseh R., Tho P., Ooi A., Petkovic-Duran K., Zhu Y. Cavitation microstreaming and material transport around microbubbles. International Congress on Ultrasonics, Proceedings 2010, 427-432. L.G. Garreton (Ed.).
5. Sobanski M.A., Tucker C.R., Thomas N.E., Coakley W.T. Sub-micron particle manipulation in an ultrasonic standing wave: applications in detection of clinically important biomolecules. Bioseparation 2000, 9:351-357.
6. Kilroy J.P., Klibanov A.L., Wamhoff B.R., Hossack J.A. Intravascular ultrasound catheter to enhance microbubble-based drug delivery via acoustic radiation force. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2012, 59:2156-2166.
7. Ferrara K.W., Borden M.A., Zhang H. Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42:881-892.
8. van Wamel A., Kooiman K., Harteveld M., Emmer M., ten Cate F.J., Versluis M., de Jong N. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J. Control. Release 2006, 112:149-155.
9. King L.V. On the acoustic radiation pressure on spheres. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1934, A147:212-240.
10. Yosioka K., Kawasima Y. Acoustic radiation pressure on a compressible sphere. Acustica 1955, 5:167-173.
11. Bruus H. Acoustofluidics 7: the acoustic radiation force on small particles. Lab Chip 2012, 12:1014-1021.
12. Gor'kov L.P. On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 1962, 6:773-775.
13. Evander M., Nilsson J. Acoustofluidics 20: applications in acoustic trapping. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4667-4676.
14. Glynne-Jones P., Boltryk R.J., Hill M., Zhang F., Dong L., Wilkinson J.S., Brown T., Melvin T., Harris N.R. Multi-modal particle manipulator to enhance bead-based bioassays. Ultrasonics 2010, 50:235-239.
15. Bazou D., Castro A., Hoyos M. Controlled cell aggregation in a pulsed acoustic field. Ultrasonics 2012, 52:842-850.
16. Gröschl M. Ultrasonic separation of suspended particles - part I: fundamentals. Acustica 1998, 84:432-447.
17. Meng L., Cai F., Jin Q., Niu L., Jiang C., Wang Z., Wu J., Zheng H. Acoustic aligning and trapping of microbubbles in an enclosed PDMS microfluidic device. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160:1599-1605.
18. Meng L., Cai F., Zhang Z., Niu L., Jin Q., Yan F., Wu J., Wang Z., Zheng H. Transportation of single cell and microbubbles by phase-shift introduced to standing leaky surface acoustic waves. Biomicrofluidics 2011, 5:044104.
19. Xi X., Cegla F.B., Lowe M., Thiemann A., Nowak T., Mettin R., Holsteyns F., Lippert A. Study on the bubble transport mechanism in an acoustic standing wave field. Ultrasonics 2011, 51:1014-1025.
20. Boluriaan S., Morris P. Acoustic streaming: from Rayleigh to today. Int. J. Appl.Aeroacoustics 2003, 2:255-292.
21. Wiklund M., Green R., Ohlin M. Acoustofluidics 14: applications of acoustic streaming in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2438-2451.
22. Hamilton M.F., Ilinskii Y.A., Zabolotskaya E.A. Acoustic streaming generated by standing waves in two-dimensional channels of arbitrary width. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113:153-160.
23. Rayleigh Lord On the circulation of air observed in Kundt's tubes and on some allied acoustical problems. Philos. Trans. 1884, 175:1-21.
24. Lei J., Glynne-Jones P., Hill M. Acoustic streaming in the transducer plane in ultrasonic particle manipulation devices. Lab Chip 2013, 13:2133-2143.
25. Bruus H. Acoustofluidics 10: scaling laws in acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 2012, 12:1578-1586.
26. Kuznetsova L.A., Coakley W.T. Applications of ultrasound streaming and radiation force in biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22:1567-1577.
27. Lee Y.H., You J.O., Peng C.A. Retroviral transduction of adherent cells in resonant acoustic fields. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21:372-376.
28. Li H., Friend J.R., Yeo L.Y. Surface acoustic wave concentration of particle and bioparticle suspensions. Biomed. Microdevices 2007, 9:647-656.
29. Singh R., Sankaranarayanan S.K.R.S., Bhethanabotla V.R. Enhancement of acoustic streaming induced flow on a focused surface acoustic wave device: implications for biosensing and microfluidics. Journal Of Applied Physics 2010, 107:024503.
30. Lenshof A., Evander M., Laurell T., Nilsson J. Acoustofluidics 5: building microfluidic acoustic resonators. Lab Chip 2012, 12:684-695.
31. Glynne-Jones P., Boltryk R.J., Hill M. Acoustofluidics 9: modelling and applications of planar resonant devices for acoustic particle manipulation. Lab Chip 2012, 12:1417-1426.
32. Hawkes J.J., Radel S. Acoustofluidics 22: multiwavelength devices and scale dependent properties. Lab Chip 2013, 13:610-627.
33. Hawkes J.J., Coakley W.T. Force field particle filter, combining ultrasound standing waves and laminar flow. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2001, 75:213-222.
34. Harris N.R., Hill M., Beeby S.P., Shen Y., White N.M., Hawkes J.J., Coakley W.T. A silicon microfluidic ultrasonic separator. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2003, 95:425-434.
35. Petersson F., Nilsson A., Holm C., Jonsson H., Laurell T. Separation of lipids from blood utilizing ultrasonic standing waves in microfluidic channels. Analyst 2004, 129:938-943.
36. Hammarstrom B., Evander M., Barbeau H., Bruzelius M., Larsson J., Laurell T., Nilsson J. Non-contact acoustic cell trapping in disposable glass capillaries. Lab Chip 2010, 10:2251-2257.
37. Manneberg O., Svennebring J., Hertz H.M., Wiklund M. Wedge transducer design for two-dimensional ultrasonic manipulation in a microfluidic chip. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18:095025.
38. Gedge M., Hill M. Acoustofluidics 17: theory and applications of surface acoustic wave devices for particle manipulation. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2998-3007.
39. Yeo L.Y., Friend J.R. Ultrafast microfluidics using surface acoustic waves. Biomicrofluidics 2009, 3:012002.
40. Shi J.J., Huang H., Stratton Z., Huang Y.P., Huang T.J. Continuous particle separation in a microfluidic channel via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW). Lab Chip 2009, 9:3354-3359.
41. Wood C.D., Cunningham J.E., O'Rorke R., Walti C., Linfield E.H., Davies A.G., Evans S.D. Formation and manipulation of two-dimensional arrays of micron-scale particles in microfluidic systems by surface acoustic waves. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94:054101.
42. Reboud J., Bourquin Y., Wilson R., Pall G.S., Jiwaji M., Pitt A.R., Graham A., Waters A.P., Cooper J.M. Shaping acoustic fields as a toolset for microfluidic manipulations in diagnostic technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:15162-15167.
43. Wang Z.C., Zhe J.A. Recent advances in particle and droplet manipulation for lab-on-a-chip devices based on surface acoustic waves. Lab Chip 2011, 11:1280-1285.
44. Glynne-Jones P., Démoré C., Ye C., Qiu Y., Cochran S., Hill M. Array controlled ultrasonic manipulation of particles in planar acoustic resonator. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2012, 59:1258-1266.
45. Grinenko A., Ong C.K., Courtney C.R.P., Wilcox P.D., Drinkwater B.W. Efficient counter-propagating wave acoustic micro-particle manipulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101:233501.
46. Grinenko A., Wilcox P.D., Courtney C.R.P., Drinkwater B.W. Proof of principle study of ultrasonic particle manipulation by a circular array device. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sc 2012, 468:3571-3586.
47. Evander M., Johansson L., Lilliehorn T., Piskur J., Lindvall M., Johansson S., Almqvist M., Laurell T., Nilsson J. Noninvasive acoustic cell trapping in a microfluidic perfusion system for online bioassays. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:2984-2991.
48. Leighton T.G. The Acoustic Bubble 1997, Academic Press Inc.
49. Nyborg W.L. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2001, 27:301-333.
50. Vanherberghen B., Manneberg O., Christakou A., Frisk T., Ohlin M., Hertz H.M., Onfelt B., Wiklund M. Ultrasound-controlled cell aggregation in a multi-well chip. Lab Chip 2010, 10:2727-2732.
51. Wong K.K. Properties of Lithium Niobate. IET 2002.
52. Safari A., Akdogan E.K. Piezoelectric and Acoustic Materials for Transducer Applications 2008, Springer.
53. Harris N.R., Hill M., Torah R.N., Townsend R.J., Beeby S.P., White N.M., Ding J. A multilayer thick-film PZT actuator for MEMs applications. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2006, 132:311-316.
54. Muralt P. Recent progress in materials issues for piezoelectric MEMS. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91:1385-1396.
55. Muralt P., Polcawich R.G., Trolier-McKinstry S. Piezoelectric thin films for sensors, actuators, and energy harvesting. MRS Bull. 2009, 34:658-664.
56. Aktakka E.E., Peterson R.L., Najafi K. Wafer-level integration of high-quality bulk piezoelectric ceramics on silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60:2022-2030.
57. Sweet J.H., Hutson D., Cochran S., Bernassau A. Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures. Sens. Rev. 2009, 29:326-332.
58. Cochran S., Bernassau A.L., Cumming D.R.S., Demore C.E.M., Desmulliez M.P.Y., Sweet J. Future integration of silicon electronics with miniature piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers and arrays. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IEEE, San Diego 2010, 1108-1116.
59. Zell K., Sperl J.I., Vogel M.W., Niessner R., Haisch C. Acoustical properties of selected tissue phantom materials for ultrasound imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:N475-N484.
60. Cobbold R.S.C. Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound 2006, Oxford University Press, USA.
61. Yantchev V., Enlund J., Katardjiev I., Johansson L. A micromachined Stoneley acoustic wave system for continuous flow particle manipulation in microfluidic channels. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2010, 20:035031.
62. Johansson L., Enlund J., Johansson S., Katardjiev I., Yantchev V. Surface acoustic wave induced particle manipulation in a PDMS channel-principle concepts for continuous flow applications. Biomed. Microdevices 2012, 14:279-289.
63. Qiu Y., Demore C., Sharma S., Cochran S., Hughes D.A., Weijer K. Multi-wavelength ultrasonic standing wave device for non-invasive cell manipulation and characterisation. Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011 IEEE International 2011, 188-191.
64. Lam K.H., Hsu H.-S., Li Y., Lee C., Lin A., Zhou Q., Kim E.S., Shung K.K. Ultrahigh frequency lensless ultrasonic transducers for acoustic tweezers application. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110:881-886.
65. Wiklund M. Acoustofluidics 12: biocompatibility and cell viability in microfluidic acoustic resonators. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2018-2028.
66. Doblhoffdier O., Gaida T., Katinger H., Burger W., Groschl M., Benes E. a novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal-cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 1994, 10:428-432.
67. Bohm H., Anthony P., Davey M.R., Briarty L.G., Power J.B., Lowe K.C., Benes E., Groschl M. Viability of plant cell suspensions exposed to homogeneous ultrasonic fields of different energy density and wave type. Ultrasonics 2000, 38:629-632.
68. Shirgaonkar I.Z., Lanthier S., Kamen A. Acoustic cell filter: a proven cell retention technology for perfusion of animal cell cultures. Biotechnol. Adv. 2004, 22:433-444.
69. Wang Z.W., Grabenstetter P., Feke D.L., Belovich J.M. Retention and viability characteristics of mammalian cells in an acoustically driven polymer mesh. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20:384-387.
70. Hultström J., Manneberg O., Dopf K., Hertz H.M., Brismar H., Wiklund M. Proliferation and viability of adherent cells manipulated by standing-wave ultrasound in a microfluidic chip. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 33:175-181.
71. Bazou D., Coakley W.T., Meek K.M., Yang M., Pham D.T. Characterisation of the morphology of 2-D particle aggregates in different electrolyte concentrations in an ultrasound trap. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2004, 243:97-104.
72. Bazou D., Dowthwaite G.P., Khan I.M., Archer C.W., Ralphs J.R., Coakley W.T. Gap junctional intercellular communication and cytoskeletal organization in chondrocytes in suspension in an ultrasound trap. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2006, 23:195-205.
73. Bazou D., Kearney R., Mansergh F., Bourdon C., Farrar J., Wride M. Gene expression analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells following levitation in an ultrasound standing wave trap. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2011, 37:321-330.
74. Kerr C.L., Gregory D.W., Shammari M., Watmough D.J., Wheatley D.N. Differing effects of ultrasound-irradiation on suspension and monolayer cultured hela cells, investigated by scanning electron microscopy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1989, 15:397-401.
75. Lee Y.H., Peng C.A. Enhanced retroviral gene delivery in ultrasonic standing wave fields. Gene Ther. 2005, 12:625-633.
76. Rodamporn S., Harris N.R., Beeby S.P., Boltryk R.J., Sanchez-Elsner T. HeLa cell transfection using a novel sonoporation system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 58:927-934.
77. Carugo D., Ankrett D.N., Glynne-Jones P., Capretto L., Boltryk R.J., Zhang X., Townsend P.A., Hill M. Contrast agent-free sonoporation: the use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents. Biomicrofluidics 2011, 5:44108-44115.
78. Hassan M.A., Buldakov M.A., Ogawa R., Zhao Q.L., Furusawa Y., Kudo N., Kondo T., Riesz P. Modulation control over ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: evaluating the importance of standing waves. J. Control. Release 2010, 141:70-76.
79. Krasovitski B., Frenkel V., Shoham S., Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:3258-3263.
80. Wiklund M., Radel S., Hawkes J.J. Acoustofluidics 21: ultrasound-enhanced immunoassays and particle sensors. Lab Chip 2013, 13:25-39.
81. Wiklund M., Hertz H.M. Ultrasonic enhancement of bead-based bioaffinity assays. Lab Chip 2006, 6:1279-1292.
82. Hammarstrom B., Laurell T., Nilsson J. Seed particle-enabled acoustic trapping of bacteria and nanoparticles in continuous flow systems. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4296-4304.
83. Manneberg O., Vanherberghen B., Svennebring J., Hertz H.M., Onfelt B., Wiklund M. A three-dimensional ultrasonic cage for characterization of individual cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93:063901.
84. Lee J., Lee C., Kim H.H., Jakob A., Lemor R., Teh S.Y., Lee A., Shung K.K. Targeted cell immobilization by ultrasound microbeam. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1643-1650.
85. Whitney N.P., Lamb A.C., Louw T.M., Subramanian A. Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction pathway of low-intensity continuous ultrasound in human chondrocytes. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012, 38:1734-1743.
86. Garvin K.A., Hocking D.C., Dalecki D. Controlling the spatial organization of cells and extracellular matrix proteins in engineered tissues using ultrasound standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010, 36:1919-1932.
87. Subramanian A., Turner J.A., Budhiraja G., Thakurta S.G., Whitney N.P., Nudurupati S.S. Ultrasonic bioreactor as a platform for studying cellular response. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2013, 19:244-255.
88. Li H., Friend J.R., Yeo L.Y. A scaffold cell seeding method driven by surface acoustic waves. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4098-4104.
89. Bok M., Li H.Y., Yeo L.Y., Friend J.R. The dynamics of surface acoustic wave-driven scaffold cell seeding. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:387-401.
90. Liu J., Kuznetsova L.A., Edwards G.O., Xu J., Ma M., Purcell W.M., Jackson S.K., Coakley W.T. Functional three-dimensional HepG2 aggregate cultures generated from an ultrasound trap: comparison with HepG2 spheroids. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 102:1180-1189.
91. Bazou D., Coakley W.T., Hayes A.J., Jackson S.K. Long-term viability and proliferation of alginate-encapsulated 3-D HepG2 aggregates formed in an ultrasound trap. Toxicol. Vitr. 2008, 22:1321-1331.
92. Kuznetsova L.A., Bazou D., Edwards G.O., Coakley W.T. Multiple three-dimensional mammalian cell aggregates formed away from solid substrata in ultrasound standing waves. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25:834-841.
93. Garvin K.A., Dalecki D., Hocking D.C. Vascularization of three-dimensional collagen hydrogels using ultrasound standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2011, 37:1853-1864.
94. Mazzoccoli J.P., Feke D.L., Baskaran H., Pintauro P.N. Development of multilayered cell-hydrogel composites using an acoustic focusing technique. Biotechnol. Prog. 2010, 26:600-605.
95. Ding X., Shi J., Lin S.-C.S., Yazdi S., Kiraly B., Huang T.J. Tunable patterning of microparticles and cells using standing surface acoustic waves. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2491-2497.
96. Bernassau A.L., Gesellchen F., MacPherson P.G.A., Riehle M., Cumming D.R.S. Direct patterning of mammalian cells in an ultrasonic heptagon stencil. Biomed. Microdevices 2012, 14:559-564.
97. Bernassau A.L., MacPherson P.G.A., Beeley J., Drinkwater B.W., Cumming D.R.S. Patterning of microspheres and microbubbles in an acoustic tweezers. Biomed. Microdevices 2013, 15:289-297.
98. Dholakia K., Lee W.M. Optical trapping takes shape: the use of structured light fields. Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 2008, 261-337. Academic Press. Arimondo (Ed.).
99. Miller D.L., Dou C. Induction of apoptosis in sonoporation and ultrasonic gene transfer. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2009, 35:144-154.
100. Di Carlo D., Tse H.T.K., Gossett D.R. Introduction: why analyze single cells?. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 853:1-10.
101. Forslund E., Guldevall K., Olofsson P.E., Frisk T., Christakou A.E., Wiklund M., Onfelt B. Novel microchip-based tools facilitating live cell imaging and assessment of functional heterogeneity within NK cell populations. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3:300.
102. Hernot S., Klibanov A.L. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2008, 60:1153-1166.
103. Klibanov A.L., Shevchenko T.I., Raju B.I., Seip R., Chin C.T. Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2010, 148:13-17.
104. Deckers R., Moonen C.T.W. Ultrasound triggered, image guided, local drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2010, 148:25-33.
105. Ferrara K., Pollard R., Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 9:415-447.
106. Feinstein S.B., Heidenreich P.A., Dick C.D., Schneider J.M., Pastoret A.F., Rubenstein W.A., Applebaum J., Brehm J.L., Aronson S., Ellis J., et al. Albunex a new intravascular ultrasound contrast agent preliminary safety and efficacy results. Circulation 1988, 78. (II565-II565).
107. Postema M., van Wamel A., ten Cate F.J., de Jong N. High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Med. Phys. 2005, 32:3707-3711.
108. Hashmi A., Yu G., Reilly-Collette M., Heiman G., Xu J. Oscillating bubbles: a versatile tool for lab on a chip applications. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4216-4227.
109. Mulvana H., Stride E., Hajnal J.V., Eckersley R.J. Temperature dependent behavior of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010, 36:925-934.
110. Sboros V. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2008, 60:1117-1136.
111. Sijl J., Gaud E., Frinking P.J.A., Arditi M., de Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 124:4091-4097.
112. Leighton T.G. The Acoustic Bubble 1994, Academic Press, San Diego.
113. Green R., Glynne-Jones P., Boltryk R.J., Townsend P., Hill M. Controlling non-inertial cavitation microstreaming for applications in biomedical research. International Congress on Ultrasonics Gdansk, Poland 2011, 749-752.
114. Mulvana H., Browning R.J., Tang M.-X., Hajnal J.V., Eckersley R.J. Albumin coated microbubble optimization: custom fabrication and comprehensive characterization. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012, 38:1599-1607.
115. Rahim A., Taylor S.L., Bush N.L., ter Haar G.R., Bamber J.C., Porter C.D. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32:1269-1279.
116. Mehier-Humbert S., Yan F., Frinking P., Schneider M., Guy R.H., Bettinger T. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: influence of contrast agent on transfection. Bioconjug. Chem. 2007, 18:652-662.
117. Rychak J.J., Lindner J.R., Ley K., Klibanov A.L. Deformable gas-filled microbubbles targeted to P-selectin. J. Control. Release 2006, 114:288-299.
118. Geers B., Lentacker I., Sanders N.N., Demeester J., Meairs S., De Smedt S.C. Self-assembled liposome-loaded microbubbles: the missing link for safe and efficient ultrasound triggered drug-delivery. J. Control. Release 2011, 152:249-256.
119. Lum A.F.H., Borden M.A., Dayton P.A., Kruse D.E., Simon S.I., Ferrara K.W. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. J. Control. Release 2006, 111:128-134.
120. Rogers P., Neild A. Selective particle trapping using an oscillating microbubble. Lab Chip 2011, 11:3710-3715.
121. Farook U., Zhang H.B., Edirisinghe M.J., Stride E., Saffari N. Preparation of microbubble suspensions by co-axial electrohydrodynamic atomization. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29:749-754.
122. Peyman S.A., Abou-Saleh R.H., McLaughlan J.R., Ingram N., Johnson B.R.G., Critchley K., Freear S., Evans J.A., Markham A.F., Coletta P.L., Evans S.D. Expanding 3D geometry for enhanced on-chip microbubble production and single step formation of liposome modified microbubbles. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4544-4552.
123. Dixon A.J., Dhanaliwala A.H., Chen J.L., Hossack J.A. Enhanced intracellular delivery of a model drug using microbubbles produced by a microfluidic device. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39:1267-1276.
124. Afadzi M., Strand S., Nilssen E., Masoy S.-E., Johansen T., Hansen R., Angelsen B., de L.Davies C. Mechanisms of the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery of liposomes and dextrans. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2013, 60:21-33.
125. Meijering B.D.M., Juffermans L.J.M., van Wamel A., Henning R.H., Zuhorn I.S., Emmer M., Versteilen A.M.G., Paulus W.J., van Gilst W.H., Kooiman K., de Jong N., Musters R.J.P., Deelman L.E., Kamp O. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ. Res. 2009, 104:679-687.
126. Mitragotri S. Innovation-healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4:255-260.
127. Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2008, 60:1193-1208.
128. Mehier-Humbert S., Guy R.H. Physical methods for gene transfer: improving the kinetics of gene delivery into cells. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005, 57:733-753.
129. Tinkov S., Winter G., Coester C., Bekeredjian R. New doxorubicin-loaded phospholipid microbubbles for targeted tumor therapy: part I - formulation development and in-vitro characterization. J. Control. Release 2010, 143:143-150.
130. Wiklund M., Onfelt B. Ultrasoznic manipulation of single cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 853:177-196.
131. Gourevich D., Hertzberg Y., Volovick A., Shafran Y., Navon G., Cochran S., Melzer A. Ultrasound-mediated targeted drug delivery generated by multifocal beam patterns: an invitro study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39:507-514.
132. Yoo J.W., Doshi N., Mitragotri S. Adaptive micro and nanoparticles: temporal control over carrier properties to facilitate drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63:1247-1256.
133. Castle J., Butts M., Healey A., Kent K., Marino M., Feinstein S.B. Ultrasound-mediated targeted drug delivery: recent success and remaining challenges. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2013, 304:H350-H357.
134. Demore C.E.M., Yang Z., Volovick A., Cochran S., MacDonald M.P., Spalding G.C. Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108:194301.
135. Gerold B., Gourevich D., Xu D., Arditti F., Prentice P., Cochran S., Gnaim J., Yoav M., Wang L., Melzer A. Applicator for in-vitro ultrasound-activated targeted drug delivery. Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Therapeutic Ultrasound 2012, 100-110.
136. Glynne-Jones P., Hill M. Acoustofluidics 23: acoustic manipulation combined with other force fields. Lab Chip 2013, 13:1003-1010.