Gene Expression Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Following Levitation in an Ultrasound Standing Wave Trap

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 321-330

  Bazou, Despina ^a   Kearney, Roisin ^a   Mansergh, Fiona ^a   Bourdon, Celine ^a   Farrar, Jane ^a   Wride, Michael ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Cell manipulation; Differentiation; Embryoid bodies; Embryonic stem cells; Gene expression; Microenvironment; Neural; Pluripotency; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CELL MANIPULATION; DIFFERENTIATION; EMBRYOID BODY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; MICROENVIRONMENTS; NEURAL; PLURIPOTENCY; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; CYTOLOGY; ELASTIC WAVES; STEM CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS; WAVES;

GENE EXPRESSION;

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR REX1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL MANIPULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYOID BODY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TEST; KARYOTYPING; MOUSE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; STEM CELL NICHE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UTRASOUND STANDING WAVE TRAP; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MICE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 78751635607     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arzumanyan A., Anni H., Rubin R., Rubin E. Effects of ethanol on mouse embryonic stem cells. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009, 33:2172-2179.
2. Bain G., Kitchens D., Yao M., Huettner J.E., Gottlieb D.I. Embryonic stem cells express neuronal properties in vitro. Dev Biol 1995, 168:342-357.
3. Bazou D., Kuznetsova L.A., Coakley W.T. Physical environment of 2-D animal cell aggregates formed in a short path length ultrasound standing wave trap. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:423-430.
4. Bazou D., Foster G.A., Ralphs J.R., Coakley W.T. Molecular adhesion development in a neural cell monolayer forming in an ultrasound trap. Mol Membr Biol 2005, 22:229-240.
5. Bazou D., Dowthwaite G.P., Khan I.M., Archer C.W., Ralphs J.R., Coakley W.T. Gap junctional intercellular communication and cytoskeletal organization in chondrocytes in suspension in an ultrasound trap. Mol Membr Biol 2006, 23:195-205.
6. Bazou D., Coakley W.T., Hayes A.J., Jackson S.K. Long-term viability and proliferation of alginate-encapsulated 3-D HepG2 aggregates formed in an ultrasound trap. Toxicol In Vitro 2008, 22:1321-1331.
7. Bibel M., Richter J., Lacroix E., Barde Y.A. Generation of a defined and uniform population of CNS progenitors and neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:1034-1043.
8. Bratt-Leal A.M., Carpenedo R.L., McDevitt T.C. Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryoid stem cell differentiation. Biotechnol Prog 2009, 25:43-51.
9. Bustamante C., Chemla Y.R., Moffitt J.R. High-resolution dual-trap optical tweezers with differential detection: An introduction. CSH Protoc 2009, 10. pdb.top60.
10. Coakley W.T., Bazou D., Morgan J., Foster G.A., Archer C.W., Powell K., Borthwick K.A., Twomey C., Bishop J. Cell-cell contact and membrane spreading in an ultrasound trap. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2003, 34:221-230.
11. Edwards G.O., Bazou D., Kuznetsova L.A., Coakley W.T. Cell adhesion dynamics and actin cytoskeleton reorganization in HepG2 cell aggregates. Cell Commun Adhes 2007, 14:9-20.
12. Evander M., Johansson L., Lilliehorn T., Piskur J., Lindvall M., Johansson S., Almqvist M., Laurell T., Nilsson J. Noninvasive acoustic cell trapping in a microfluidic perfusion system for online bioassays. Anal Chem 2007, 79:2984-2991.
13. Gardner D.K., Lane M. Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005, 17:361-370.
14. Jang L.S., Huang P.H., Lan K.C. Single-cell trapping utilizing negative dielectrophoretic quadrupole and microwell electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron 2009, 24:3637-3644.
15. Kim D.-H., Haake A., Sun Y., Neild A.P., Ihm J.-E., Dual J., Hubbell J.A., Ju B.-K., Nelson B.J. High-throughput cell manipulation using ultrasound fields. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004, 4:2571-2574.
16. Koschwanez J.H., Carlson R.H., Meldrum D.R. Easily fabricated magnetic traps for single-cell applications. Rev Sci Instrum 2007, 78. 044301.
17. Lin C.M., Lai Y.S., Liu H.P., Chen C.Y., Wo A.M. Trapping of bioparticles via microvortices in a microfluidic device for bioassay applications. Anal Chem 2008, 80:8937-8945.
18. Liu J., Kuznetsova L.A., Edwards G.O., Xu J., Ma M., Purcell W.M., Jackson S.K., Coakley W.T. Functional three-dimensional HepG2 aggregate cultures generated from an ultrasound trap: Comparison with HepG2 spheroids. J Cell Biochem 2007, 102:1180-1189.
19. Liu W., Dechev N., Foulds I.G., Burke R., Parameswaran A., Park E.J. A novel permalloy based magnetic single cell micro array. Lab Chip 2009, 9:2381-2390.
20. Loh Y.H., Wu Q., Chew J.L., Vega V.B., Zhang W., Chen X., Bourque G., George J., Leong B., Liu J., Wong K.Y., Sung K.W., Lee C.W., Zhao X.D., Chiu K.P., Lipovich L., Kuznetsov V.A., Robson P., Stanton L.W., Wei C.L., Ruan Y., Lim B., Ng H.H. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006, 38:431-440.
21. Lonergan P., Fair T., Corcoran D., Evans A.C.O. Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos. Theriogenology 2006, 65:137-152.
22. Mansergh F., Orton N.C., Vessey J.P., Lalonde M.R., Stell W.K., Tremblay F., Barnes S., Rancourt D.E., Bech-Hansen N.T. Mutation of the calcium channel gene Cacna1f disrupts calcium signaling, synaptic transmission and cellular organization in mouse retina. Hum Mol Genet 2005, 14:3035-3046.
23. Mansergh F.C., Daly C.S., Hurley A.L., Wride M.A., Hunter S.M., Evans M.J. Gene expression profiles during early differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Dev Biol 2009, 9:5-23.
24. Mohanty S.K., Mohanty K.S., Berns M.W. Manipulation of mammalian cells using a single-fiber optical microbeam. J Biomed Opt 2008, 13. 054049.
25. Morrison S.J., Spradling A.C. Stem cells and niches: Mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 2008, 132:598-611.
26. Niwa H. How is pluripotency determined and maintained?. Development 2010, 134:635-646.
27. Nyborg W.L. Biological effects of ultrasound: Development of safety guidelines. Part II: General review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:301-333.
28. Oberti S., Neild A., Dual J. Manipulation of micrometer sized particles within a micromachined fluidic device to form two-dimensional patterns using ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:778-785.
29. Thomas R.S., Morgan H., Green N.G. Negative DEP traps for single cell immobilisation. Lab Chip 2009, 9:1534-1540.
30. Watt F.C., Hogan B.L. Out of Eden: Stem cells and their niches. Science 2000, 287:1427-1430.
31. Watt F.M., Driskell R.R. The therapeutic potential of stem cells. Phil Trans R Soc B 2010, 365:155-163.