Modulation control over ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: Evaluating the importance of standing waves

Journal of Controlled Release

Volumn 141, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 70-76

  Hassan, Mariame A ^a,b   Buldakov, Mikhail A ^c,d,e   Ogawa, Ryohei ^a   Zhao, Qing Li ^a   Furusawa, Yukihiro ^a   Kudo, Nobuki ^f   Kondo, Takashi ^a   Riesz, Peter ^g  

^a TOYAMA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^d TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^e INSTITUTE OF HIGH CURRENT ELECTRONICS   (Russian Federation)

^f HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene delivery; Low intensity ultrasound; Pulse repetition frequency (PRF); Standing waves; Ultrasound streaming

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM IONS; CAVITATIONAL ACTIVITY; CONTRAST AGENT; DNA DELIVERY; GENE DELIVERY; KEY ELEMENTS; LOW INTENSITY ULTRASOUND; LUCIFERASE EXPRESSION; MODULATION FREQUENCIES; SOLUTION AGITATION; STANDING WAVE; ULTRASOUND FIELDS; ULTRASOUND-MEDIATED GENE DELIVERY;

ACOUSTIC WAVES; CALCIUM; DRUG THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER; MODULATION; NUCLEIC ACIDS; STANDING WAVE METERS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION; WAVES;

ULTRASONICS;

CALCIUM ION; PLASMID DNA; SHU 508;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA TRANSFECTION; ECHOGRAPHY; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONVIRAL GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; DNA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; LUCIFERASES; PHONOPHORESIS; SONICATION; TRANSFECTION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 71049181434     PISSN: 01683659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Patil S.D., Rhodes D.G., and Burgess D.J. DNA-based therapeutics and DNA delivery systems: a comprehensive review. Aaps J 7 1 (2005) E61-E77
2. Tran T.A., Roger S., Le Guennec J.Y., Tranquart F., and Bouakaz A. Effect of ultrasound-activated microbubbles on the cell electrophysiological properties. Ultrasound. Med. Biol. 33 1 (2007) 158-163
3. Mehier-Humbert S., Bettinger T., Yan F., and Guy R.H. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J. Control Release 104 1 (2005) 213-222
4. Deng C.X., Sieling F., Pan H., and Cui J. Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 4 (2004) 519-526
5. Yang F., Gu N., Chen D., Xi X., Zhang D., Li Y., and Wu J. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation. J. Control Release 131 (2008) 205-210
6. Duvshani-Eshet M., and Machluf M. Therapeutic ultrasound optimization for gene delivery: a key factor achieving nuclear DNA localization. J. Control Release 108 2-3 (2005) 513-528
7. Duvshani-Eshet M., Baruch L., Kesselman E., Shimoni E., and Machluf M. Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene. Ther. 13 2 (2006) 163-172
8. Huang S.L. Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 10 (2008) 1167-1176
9. Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A., and Staples B.J. Ultrasonic drug delivery-a general review. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 1 1 (2004) 37-56
10. Feril Jr. L.B., Ogawa R., Tachibana K., and Kondo T. Optimized ultrasound-mediated gene transfection in cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 97 10 (2006) 1111-1114
11. Rahim A., Taylor S.L., Bush N.L., ter Haar G.R., Bamber J.C., and Porter C.D. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 8 (2006) 1269-1279
12. Zarnitsyn V.G., and Prausnitz M.R. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 4 (2004) 527-538
13. Buldakov M.A., Hassan M.A., Zhao Q.L., Feril Jr. L.B., Kudo N., Kondo T., Litvyakov N.V., Bolshakov M.A., Rostov V.V., Cherdyntseva N.V., and Riesz P. Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro. Ultrason. Sonochem. 16 3 (2009) 392-397
14. Fang H.Y., Tsai K.C., Cheng W.H., Shieh M.J., Lou P.J., Lin W.L., and Chen W.S. The effects of power on-off durations of pulsed ultrasound on the destruction of cancer cells. Int. J. Hypertherm. 23 4 (2007) 371-380
15. Pan H., Zhou Y., Izadnegahdar O., Cui J., and Deng C.X. Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31 6 (2005) 849-856
16. Lee Y.H., and Peng C.A. Nonviral transfection of suspension cells in ultrasound standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 5 (2007) 734-742
17. Honda H., Zhao Q.L., and Kondo T. Effects of dissolved gases and an echo contrast agent on apoptosis induced by ultrasound and its mechanism via the mitochondria-caspase pathway. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 28 5 (2002) 673-682
18. Mehier-Humbert T.B.S., Yan F., and Guy R.H. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 104 1 (2005) 213-222
19. Zhang S., Xu Y., Wang B., Qiao W., Liu D., and Li Z. Cationic compounds used in lipoplexes and polyplexes for gene delivery. J. Control. Release 100 2 (2004) 165-180
20. Merdan T., Kopecek J., and Kissel T. Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54 5 (2002) 715-758
21. Starritt H.C., Duck F.A., and Humphrey V.F. An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 15 4 (1989) 363-373
22. VanBavel E. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: possible relevance for ultrasound applications. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 93 1-3 (2007) 374-383
23. Ciaravino V., Flynn H.G., and Miller M.W. Pulsed enhancement of acoustic cavitation: a postulated model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 7 2 (1981) 159-166
24. Henglein A. Sonochemistry: historical developments and modern aspects. Ultrasonics 25 (1987) 6-16
25. van Wamel A., Kooiman K., Harteveld M., Emmer M., ten Cate F.J., Versluis M., and de Jong N. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J. Control Release 112 2 (2006) 149-155
26. Khanna S., Hudson B., Pepper C.J., Amso N.N., and Coakley W.T. Fluorescein isothiocynate-dextran uptake by Chinese hamster ovary cells in a 1.5 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in the presence of contrast agent. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 2 (2006) 289-295
27. Kodama T., Tomita Y., Koshiyama K., and Blomley M.J. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 6 (2006) 905-914
28. Kinoshita M., and Hynynen K. Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 359 4 (2007) 860-865
29. Lai C.Y., Wu C.H., Chen C.C., and Li P.C. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 12 (2006) 1931-1941
30. Khanna S., Amso N.N., Paynter S.J., and Coakley W.T. Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 10 (2003) 1463-1470
31. Tata D.B., Dunn F., and Tindall D.J. Selective clinical ultrasound signals mediate differential gene transfer and expression in two human prostate cancer cell lines: LnCap and PC-3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234 1 (1997) 64-67
32. Devcic-Kuhar B., Pfaffenberger S., Groschl M., Kollmann C., Benes E., and Gottsauner-Wolf M. In vitro thrombolysis enhanced by standing and travelling ultrasound wave fields. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 28 9 (2002) 1181-1187
33. Pfaffenberger S., Devcic-Kuhar B., El-Rabadi K., Groschl M., Speidl W.S., Weiss T.W., Huber K., Benes E., Maurer G., Wojta J., and Gottsauner-Wolf M. 2 MHz ultrasound enhances t-PA-mediated thrombolysis: comparison of continuous versus pulsed ultrasound and standing versus travelling acoustic waves. Thromb. Haemost. 89 3 (2003) 583-589
34. Lindell J., Girard P., Muller N., Jordan M., and Wurm F. Calfection: a novel gene transfer method for suspension cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1676 2 (2004) 155-161