Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells regulate biased DNA segregation in response to cell adhesion asymmetry

Cell Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 601-610

  Freida, Delphine ^a,b,c,d,e   Lecourt, Severine ^c,d,e   Cras, Audrey ^c,d,e   Vanneaux, Valérie ^c,d,e   Letort, Gaelle ^a,b,f,g   Gidrol, Xavier ^a,b,c   Guyon, Laurent ^a,b,c   Larghero, Jerome ^c,d,e   Thery, Manuel ^a,b,f,g  

^a CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^f CEMAGREF   (France)

^g CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL DNA; FIBRONECTIN; DNA;

ARTICLE; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL ADHESION; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAUGHTER CELL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GEOMETRY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MITOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SISTER CHROMATID; SKIN FIBROBLAST; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOLOGY; FIBROBLAST; GENETICS; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; METAPHASE; PHYSIOLOGY;

BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; METAPHASE;

EID: 84887606672     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arnulf B., Lecourt S., Soulier J., Ternaux B., Lacassagne M.-N., Crinquette A., Dessoly J., Sciaini A.-K., Benbunan M., Chomienne C., et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2007, 21:158-163.
2. Brizzi M.F., Tarone G., Defilippi P. Extracellular matrix, integrins, and growth factors as tailors of the stem cell niche. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24:645-651.
3. Chen S., Lewallen M., Xie T. Adhesion in the stem cell niche: biological roles and regulation. Development 2013, 140:255-265.
4. Conboy M.J., Karasov A.O., Rando T.A. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e102.
5. Davison A.C. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Ehninger A., Trumpp A. The bone marrow stem cell niche grows up: mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages move in. J.Exp. Med. 2011, 208:421-428.
7. Ellis S.J., Tanentzapf G. Integrin-mediated adhesion and stem-cell-niche interactions. Cell Tissue Res. 2010, 339:121-130.
8. Escobar M., Nicolas P., Sangar F., Laurent-Chabalier S., Clair P., Joubert D., Jay P., Legraverend C. Intestinal epithelial stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetric chromosome segregation. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:258.
9. Evano B., Tajbakhsh S. Sorting DNA with asymmetry: a new player in gene regulation?. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21:225-242.
10. Falconer E., Chavez E.A., Henderson A., Poon S.S., McKinney S., Brown L., Huntsman D.G., Lansdorp P.M. Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences. Nature 2010, 463:93-97.
11. Gönczy P. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: flies and worms pave the way. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:355-366.
12. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:17-26.
13. Inaba M., Yamashita Y.M. Asymmetric stem cell division: precision for robustness. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11:461-469.
14. Kajstura J., Bai Y., Cappetta D., Kim J., Arranto C., Sanada F., D'Amario D., Matsuda A., Bardelli S., Ferreira-Martins J., et al. Tracking chromatid segregation to identify human cardiac stem cells that regenerate extensively the infarcted myocardium. Circ. Res. 2012, 111:894-906.
15. Karpowicz P., Morshead C., Kam A., Jervis E., Ramunas J., Cheng V., van der Kooy D., van der Kooy D. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically invitro. J.Cell Biol. 2005, 170:721-732.
16. Kiel M.J., He S., Ashkenazi R., Gentry S.N., Teta M., Kushner J.A., Jackson T.L., Morrison S.J. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature 2007, 449:238-242.
17. Le Blanc K., Frassoni F., Ball L., Locatelli F., Roelofs H., Lewis I., Lanino E., Sundberg B., Bernardo M.E., Remberger M., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet 2008, 371:1579-1586.
18. Li R., Gundersen G.G. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:860-873.
19. Maiato H., Barral Y. Unbiased about chromosome segregation: give me a mechanism and I will make you "immortal". Chromosome Res. 2013, 21:189-191.
20. Marthiens V., Kazanis I., Moss L., Long K., Ffrench-Constant C. Adhesion molecules in the stem cell niche-more than just staying in shape?. J.Cell Sci. 2010, 123:1613-1622.
21. Merok J.R., Lansita J.A., Tunstead J.R., Sherley J.L. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics. Cancer Res. 2002, 62:6791-6795.
22. Morin X., Bellaïche Y. Mitotic spindle orientation in asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions during animal development. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:102-119.
23. Mullins R.D. Cytoskeletal mechanisms for breaking cellular symmetry. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2:a003392.
24. Pine S.R., Ryan B.M., Varticovski L., Robles A.I., Harris C.C. Microenvironmental modulation of asymmetric cell division in human lung cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:2195-2200.
25. Potten C.S., Owen G., Booth D. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J.Cell Sci. 2002, 115:2381-2388.
26. Rocheteau P., Gayraud-Morel B., Siegl-Cachedenier I., Blasco M.A., Tajbakhsh S. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 2012, 148:112-125.
27. Rozario T., DeSimone D.W. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: a dynamic view. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341:126-140.
28. Sauer S., Burkett S.S., Lewandoski M., Klar A.J.S. A CO-FISH assay to assess sister chromatid segregation patterns in mitosis of mouse embryonic stem cells. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21:311-328.
29. Shinin V., Gayraud-Morel B., Gomès D., Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:677-687.
30. Smith G.H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005, 132:681-687.
31. Sotiropoulou P.A., Candi A., Blanpain C. The majority of multipotent epidermal stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetrical chromosome segregation. Stem Cells 2008, 26:2964-2973.
32. Tajbakhsh S., Gonzalez C. Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:804-810.
33. Théry M., Racine V., Pépin A., Piel M., Chen Y., Sibarita J.-B., Bornens M. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:947-953.
34. Théry M., Jiménez-Dalmaroni A., Racine V., Bornens M., Jülicher F. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 2007, 447:493-496.
35. Tukey J.W. Bias and confidence in not quite large samples. Ann. Math. Stat. 1958, 29:614.
36. Wang Y., Ku C.-J., Zhang E.R., Artyukhin A.B., Weiner O.D., Wu L.F., Altschuler S.J. Identifying network motifs that buffer front-to-back signaling in polarized neutrophils. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1607-1616.
37. Yamashita Y.M. Cell adhesion in regulation of asymmetric stem cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:605-610.