Correction: Tracking chromatid segregation to identify human cardiac stem cells that regenerate extensively the infarcted myocardium (Circ Res. (2012) 111 (894-906) DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.273649);Tracking chromatid segregation to identify human cardiac stem cells that regenerate extensively the infarcted myocardium

Circulation Research

Volumn 111, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 894-906

  Kajstura, Jan ^a   Bai, Yingnan ^a   Cappetta, Donato ^a   Kim, Junghyun ^a   Arranto, Christian ^a   Sanada, Fumihiro ^a   D'Amario, Domenico ^a   Matsuda, Alex ^a   Bardelli, Silvana ^a   Ferreira Martins, João ^a   Hosoda, Toru ^a   Leri, Annarosa ^a   Rota, Marcello ^a   Loscalzo, Joseph ^a   Anversa, Piero ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

adult stem cells; asymmetrical chromatid segregation; asymmetrical stem cell division; cell cycle; immortal DNA strand hypothesis; myocardial infarction; myocardial regeneration; proliferation; symmetrical chromatid segregation

Indexed keywords

BROXURIDINE; CELL DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CLONING; CELL DIVISION; CELL GROWTH; CELL IMMORTALIZATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL REGENERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; DAUGHTER CELL; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STEM CELL; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TELOMERE;

EID: 84866531699     PISSN: 00097330     EISSN: 15244571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/RES.0000000000000086     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Murry CE, Lee RT. Development biology. Turnover after the fallout. Science. 2009;324:47-48.
2. Parmacek MS, Epstein JA. Cardiomyocyte renewal. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:86-88.
3. Minami E, Laflamme MA, Saffitz JE, Murry CE. Extracardiac progenitor cells repopulate most major cell types in the transplanted human heart. Circulation. 2005;112:2951-2958.
4. Bayes-Genis A, Roura S, Prat-Vidal C, Farré J, Soler-Botija C, de Luna AB, Cinca J. Chimerism and microchimerism of the human heart: evidence for cardiac regeneration. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007; 4(Suppl 1):S40-S45.
5. Urbanek K, Cesselli D, Rota M, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Boni A, Bolli R, Kajstura J, Anversa P, Leri A. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:9226-9231.
6. Bearzi C, Rota M, Hosoda T, et al. Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14068-14073.
7. Chong JJ, Chandrakanthan V, Xaymardan M, et al. Adult cardiac-resident MSC-like stem cells with a proepicardial origin. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:527-540.
8. Ferreira-Martins J, Ogórek B, Cappetta D, et al. Cardiomyogenesis in the developing heart is regulated by c-kit-positive cardiac stem cells. Circ Res. 2012;110:701-715.
9. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature. 1975;255:197-200.
10. Potten CS, Owen G, Booth D. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2381-2388.
11. Rando TA. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell. 2007;129:1239-1243.
12. Kiel MJ, He S, Ashkenazi R, Gentry SN, Teta M, Kushner JA, Jackson TL, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature. 2007;449:238-242.
13. Lansdorp PM. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell. 2007;129:1244-1247.
14. Falconer E, Chavez E, Henderson A, Lansdorp PM. Chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization to study sister chromatid segregation in vivo. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:1362-1377.
15. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, Jervis E, Ramunas J, Cheng V, van der Kooy D. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:721-732.
16. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomès D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:677-687.
17. Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e102.
18. Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. How stem cells age and why this makes us grow old. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:703-713.
19. Mohrin M, Bourke E, Alexander D, Warr MR, Barry-Holson K, Le Beau MM, Morrison CG, Passegué E. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence promotes error-prone DNA repair and mutagenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:174-185.
20. Rocheteau P, Gayraud-Morel B, Siegl-Cachedenier I, Blasco MA, Taj-bakhsh S. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell. 2012;148:112-125.
21. Bearzi C, Leri A, Lo Monaco F, Rota M, Gonzalez A, Hosoda T, Pepe M, Qanud K, Ojaimi C, Bardelli S, D'Amario D, D'Alessandro DA, Michler RE, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM, Urbanek K, Hintze TH, Kajstura J, Anversa P. Identification of a coronary vascular progenitor cell in the human heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15885-15890.
22. Brunet S, Vernos I. Chromosome motors on the move. From motion to spindle checkpoint activity. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:669-673.
23. Armakolas A, Klar AJ. Left-right dynein motor implicated in selective chromatid segregation in mouse cells. Science. 2007;315:100-101.
24. Sapienza C. Molecular biology. Do Watson and Crick motor from X to Z? Science. 2007;315:46-47.
25. Neumüller RA, Knoblich JA. Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2675-2699.
26. Morrison SJ, Kimble J. Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature. 2006;441:1068-1074.
27. Crissman HA, Oishi N, Habbersett R. Detection of BrdUrd-labeled cells by differential fluorescence analysis of DNA fluorochromes: pulse-chase and continuous labeling methods. Methods Cell Biol. 1994;41:341-349.
28. Rampal S, Liu M, Chen FA. Characterization of TO-PRO-3 as an inter-calator for double-standard DNA analysis with red diode laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr. 1997;781:357-365.
29. Beisker W, Weller-Mewe EM, Nüsse M. Fluorescence enhancement of DNA-bound TO-PRO-3 by incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine to monitor cell cycle kinetics. Cytometry. 1999;37:221-229.
30. Chan FK, Holmes KL. Flow cytometric analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer: a tool for high-throughput screening of molecular interactions in living cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;263:281-292.
31. Bolli R, Chugh AR, D'Amario D, et al. Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1847-1857.
32. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, Kasahara H, Rota M, Musso E, Urbanek K, Leri A, Kajstura J, Nadal-Ginard B, Anversa P. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763-776.
33. Urbanek K, Rota M, Cascapera S, et al. Cardiac stem cells possess growth factor-receptor systems that after activation regenerate the infarcted myocardium, improving ventricular function and long-term survival. Circ Res. 2005;97:663-673.
34. Padin-Iruegas ME, Misao Y, Davis ME, Segers VF, Esposito G, Tokunou T, Urbanek K, Hosoda T, Rota M, Anversa P, Leri A, Lee RT, Kajstura J. Cardiac progenitor cells and biotinylated insulin-like growth factor-1 nanofibers improve endogenous and exogenous myocardial regeneration after infarction. Circulation. 2009;120:876-887.
35. Rota M, Padin-Iruegas ME, Misao Y, et al. Local activation or implantation of cardiac progenitor cells rescues scarred infarcted myocardium improving cardiac function. Circ Res. 2008;103:107-116.
36. D'Amario D, Cabral-Da-Silva MC, Zheng H, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor identifies a pool of human cardiac stem cells with superior therapeutic potential for myocardial regeneration. Circ Res. 2011;108:1467-1481.
37. Roell W, Lewalter T, Sasse P, et al. Engraftment of connexin 43-expressing cells prevents post-infarct arrhythmia. Nature. 2007;450:819-824.
38. Harrison DE. Normal production of erythrocytes by mouse marrow continuous for 73 months. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973;70:3184-3188.
39. Weber K, Thomaschewski M, Warlich M, Volz T, Cornils K, Niebuhr B, Täger M, Lütgehetmann M, Pollok JM, Stocking C, Dandri M, Benten D, Fehse B. RGB marking facilitates multicolor clonal cell tracking. Nat Med. 2011;17:504-509.
40. Kajstura J, Rota M, Hall SR, et al. Evidence for human lung stem cells. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1795-1806.
41. Boni A, Urbanek K, Nascimbene A, et al. Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15529-15534.
42. Steinhauser ML, Bailey AP, Senyo SE, Guillermier C, Perlstein TS, Gould AP, Lee RT, Lechene CP. Multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry quantifies stem cell division and metabolism. Nature. 2012;481:516-519.
43. Sundararaman B, Avitabile D, Konstandin MH, Cottage CT, Gude N, Sussman MA. Asymmetric chromatid segregation in cardiac progenitor cells is enhanced by pim-1 kinase. Circ Res. 2012;110:1169-1173.
44. Makkar RR, Smith RR, Cheng K, Malliaras K, Thomson LE, Berman D, Czer LS, Marbán L, Mendizabal A, Johnston PV, Russell SD, Schuleri KH, Lardo AC, Gerstenblith G, Marbán E. Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2012;379:895-904.
45. Leri A, Kajstura J, Anversa P. Role of cardiac stem cells in cardiac pathophysiology: a paradigm shift in human myocardial biology. Circ Res. 2011;109:941-961.
46. Goichberg P, Bai Y, D'Amario D, et al. The ephrin A1-EphA2 system promotes cardiac stem cell migration after infarction. Circ Res. 2011; 108:1071-1083.
47. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18-e209.
48. Force T. The weakness of a big heart. Nat Med. 2008;14:244-245.