Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes moving together or drifting apart?

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 804-810

  Tajbakhsh, Shahragim ^a   Gonzalez, Cayetano ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL POLARITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL STRUCTURE; CENTROMERE; CENTROSOME; CHROMATID; DNA REPLICATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPIGENETICS; GENE SEGREGATION; GENE SILENCING; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CENTROSOME; DNA; HUMANS; MITOSIS;

EID: 70350454870     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2784     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Knoblich, J. A. Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 132, 583-597 (2008).
2. Uzbekov, R. & Prigent, C. Clockwise or anticlockwise? Turning the centriole triplets in the right direction! FEBS Lett. 581, 1251-1254 (2007).
3. Piel, M., Meyer, P., Khodjakov, A., Rieder, C. L. & Bornens, M. The respective contributions of the mother and daughter centrioles to centrosome activity and behavior in vertebrate cells. J. Cell Biol. 149, 317-330 (2000).
4. Bettencourt-Dias, M. & Glover, D. M. Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 451-463 (2007).
5. Yamashita, Y. M., Mahowald, A. P., Perlin, J. R. & Fuller, M. T. Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science 315, 518-521 (2007).
6. Pereira, G., Tanaka, T. U., Nasmyth, K. & Schiebel, E. Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J. 20, 6359-6370 (2001).
7. Klar, A. J. Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast. Nature 326, 466-470 (1987).
8. Klar, A. J. The developmental fate of fission yeast cells is determined by the pattern of inheritance of parental and grandparental DNA strands. EMBO J. 9, 1407-1415 (1990).
9. Klar, A. J. Lessons learned from studies of fission yeast mating-type switching and silencing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 213-236 (2007).
10. Armakolas, A. & Klar, A. J. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 3 11, 1146-1149 (2006).
11. Liu, P., Jenkins, N. A. & Copeland, N. G. Efficient Cre-loxP-induced mitotic recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 30, 66-72 (2002).
12. Cairns, J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255, 197-200 (1975).
13. Klar, A. J. A model for specification of the left-right axis in vertebrates. Trends Genet. 10, 392-396 (1994).
14. Lansdorp, P. M. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell 129, 1244-1247 (2007).
15. Tajbakhsh, S. Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 716-722 (2008).
16. Yamashita, Y. M., Jones, D. L. & Fuller, M. T. Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome. Science 301, 1547-1550 (2003).
17. Stevens, N. R., Raposo, A. A., Basto, R., St. Johnston, D. & Raff, J. W. From stem cell to embryo without centrioles. Curr. Biol. 17, 1498-1503 (2007).
18. Varmark, H. et al. Asterless is a centriolar protein required for centrosome function and embryo development in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 17, 1735-1745 (2007).
19. Basto, R. et al. Flies without centrioles. Cell 125, 1375-1386 (2006).
20. Gonzalez, C. Centrosome function during stem cell division: the devil is in the details. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 694-698 (2008).
21. Rusan, N. M. & Rogers, G. C. Centrosome function: Sometimes less is more. Traffic 10, 472-481 (2009).
22. Basto, R. et al. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 133, 1032-1042 (2008).
23. Castellanos, E., Dominguez, P. & Gonzalez, C. Centrosome dysfunction in Drosophila neural stem cells causes tumors that are not due to genome instability. Curr. Biol. 18, 1209-1214 (2008).
24. Rebollo, E. et al. Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 12, 467-474 (2007).
25. Rusan, N. M. & Peifer, M. A role for a novel centrosome cycle in asymmetric cell division. J. Cell Biol. 177, 13-20 (2007).
26. Stewart, E. J., Madden, R., Paul, G. & Taddei, F. Aging and death in an organism that reproduces by morphologically symmetric division. PLoS Biol. 3, e45 (2005).
27. Gitai, Z., Dye, N. A., Reisenauer, A., Wachi, M. & Shapiro, L. MreB actin-mediated segregation of a specific region of a bacterial chromosome. Cell 120, 329-341 (2005).
28. Huitema, E., Pritchard, S., Matteson, D., Radhakrishnan, S. K. & Viollier, P. H. Bacterial birth scar proteins mark future flagellum assembly site. Cell 124, 1025-1037 (2006).
29. Lam, H., Schofield, W. B. & Jacobs-Wagner, C. A landmark protein essential for establishing and perpetuating the polarity of a bacterial cell. Cell 124, 1011-1023 (2006).
30. White, M. A., Eykelenboom, J. K., Lopez-Vernaza, M. A., Wilson, E. & Leach, D. R. Non-random segregation of sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Nature 455, 1248-1250 (2008).
31. Lew, D. J., Burke, D. J. & Dutta, A. The immortal strand hypothesis: how could it work? Cell 133, 21-23 (2008).
32. Bowman, G. R. et al. A polymeric protein anchors the chromosomal origin/ParB complex at a bacterial cell pole. Cell 134, 945-955 (2008).
33. Sinclair, D. A. & Guarente, L. Extrachromosomal rDNA circles a cause of aging in yeast. Cell 91, 1033-1042 (1997).
34. Shcheprova, Z., Baldi, S., Frei, S. B., Gonnet, G. & Barral, Y. A mechanism for asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 454, 728-734 (2008).
35. Karpowicz, P. et al. The germline stem cells of Drosophila melanogaster partition DNA non-randomly. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 88, 397-408 (2009).
36. Pimpinelli, S. & Ripoll, P. Nonrandom segregation of centromeres following mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 3900-3903 (1986).
37. Cairns, J. Cancer and the immortal strand hypothesis. Genetics 174, 1069-1072 (2006).
38. Rando, T. A. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell 129, 1239-1243 (2007).
39. Rossi, D. J. et al. Deficiencies in DNA damage repair limit the function of haematopoietic stem cells with age. Nature 447, 725-729 (2007).
40. Fei, J. F. & Huttner, W. B. Nonselective sister chromatid segregation in mouse embryonic neocortical precursor cells. Cereb. Cortex 19, i49-i54 (2009).
41. Kiel, M. J. et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature 449, 238-242 (2007).
42. Sotiropoulou, P. A., Candi, A. & Blanpain, C. The majority of multipotent epidermal stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetrical chromosome segregation. Stem Cells 26, 2964-2973 (2008).
43. Waghmare, S. K. et al. Quantitative proliferation dynamics and random chromosome segregation of hair follicle stem cells. EMBO J. 27, 1309-1320 (2008).
44. Shinin, V., Gayraud-Morel, B., Gomes, D. & Tajbakhsh, S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 677-682 (2006).
45. Karpowicz, P. et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 170, 721-732 (2005).
46. Conboy, M. J., Karasov, A. O. & Rando, T. A. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 5, e102 (2007).
47. Bailey, S. M., Goodwin, E. H., Meyne, J. & Cornforth, M. N. CO-FISH reveals inversions associated with isochromosome formation. Mutagenesis 11, 139-144 (1996).
48. Bell, C. D. Is mitotic chromatid segregation random? Histol. Histopathol. 20, 1313-1320 (2005).
49. Jablonka, P. & Jablonka, E. Non-random sister chromatid segregation by cell type. J. Theor. Biol. 99, 427-436 (1982).
50. Patkin, E. L. Epigenetic mechanisms for primary differentiation in mammalian embryos. Int. Rev. Cytol. 216, 81-129 (2002).
51. Blow, J. J. & Hodgson, B. Replication licensing defining the proliferative state? Trends Cell Biol. 12, 72-78 (2002).
52. Henikoff, S. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 15-26 (2008).
53. Probst, A. V., Dunleavy, E. & Almouzni, G. Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 192-206 (2009).
54. Burhans, W. C. et al. Emetine allows identification of origins of mammalian DNA replication by imbalanced DNA synthesis, not through conservative nucleosome segregation. EMBO J. 10, 4351-4360 (1991).
55. Weintraub, H., Worcel, A. & Alberts, B. A model for chromatin based upon two symmetrically paired half-nucleosomes. Cell 9, 409-417 (1976).
56. Ekwall, K. Epigenetic control of centromere behaviour. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 63-81 (2007).
57. Malik, H.S. & Henikoff, S. Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 138, 1067-1082 (2009).
58. Thorpe, P. H., Bruno, J. & Rothstein, R. Kinetochore asymmetry defines a single yeast lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6673-6678 (2009).
59. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F. & Sapienza, C. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm. Genome 12, 331-339 (2001).
60. Grava, S., Schaerer, F., Faty, M., Philippsen, P. & Barral, Y. Asymmetric recruitment of dynein to spindle poles and microtubules promotes proper spindle orientation in yeast. Dev. Cell 10, 425-439 (2006).
61. Higuchi, T. & Uhlmann, F. Stabilization of microtubule dynamics at anaphase onset promotes chromosome segregation. Nature 433, 171-176 (2005).
62. Liakopoulos, D., Kusch, J., Grava, S., Vogel, J. & Barral, Y. Asymmetric loading of Kar9 onto spindle poles and microtubules ensures proper spindle alignment. Cell 112, 561-574 (2003).
63. Louie, R. K. et al. Adenomatous polyposis coli and EB1 localize in close proximity of the mother centriole and EB1 is a functional component of centrosomes. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1117-1128 (2004).
64. Armakolas, A. & Klar, A. J. Left-right dynein motor implicated in selective chromatid segregation in mouse cells. Science 315, 100-101 (2007).
65. Maiato, H., Rieder, C. L. & Khodjakov, A. Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 167, 831-840 (2004).
66. Kapoor, T. M. et al. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388-391 (2006).
67. Volpe, T. A. et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297, 1833-1837 (2002).
68. Fuchs, E., Tumbar, T. & Guasch, G. Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 116, 769-778 (2004).
69. Wilson, A. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 135, 1118-1129 (2008).
70. Potten, C. S. & Booth, C. Keratinocyte stem cells: a commentary. J. Invest. Dermatol. 119, 888-899 (2002).
71. Barker, N. et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003-1007 (2007).
72. Luders, J. & Stearns, T. Microtubule-organizing centres: a re-evaluation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 161-167 (2007).
73. Carmena, M. & Earnshaw, W. C. The cellular geography of aurora kinases. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 842-854 (2003).
74. Chang, P. & Stearns, T. Δ-tubulin and ε-tubulin: two new human centrosomal tubulins reveal new aspects of centrosome structure and function. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 30-35 (2000).