Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 819-858

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Ulrich, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Correlation analysis; Individual differences; Reaction time analysis

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84887560784     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0404-5     Document Type: Review

References (146)

1. Barutchu, A., Crewther, S. G., Fifer, J., Shivdasani, M. N., Innes-Brown, H., Toohey, S., Paolini, A. G. (2011). The relationship between multisensory integration and IQ in children. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 877-885. doi: 10. 1037/a0021903.
2. Bashore, T. R. (1994). Some thoughts on neurocognitive slowing. Acta Psychologica, 86(2-3), 295-325. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(94)90006-X.
3. Beauducel, A., & Brocke, B. (1993). Intelligence and speed of information processing: Further results and questions on Hick's paradigm and beyond. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 627-636. doi: 10. 1016/0191-8869(93)90004-M.
4. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., & Christie, C. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192-212. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2005. 07. 003.
5. Brown, T. L. (2011). The relationship between Stroop interference and facilitation effects: Statistical artifacts, baselines, and a reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 85-99. doi: 10. 1037/a0019252.
6. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological Review, 112, 117-128. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 112. 1. 117.
7. Carbonnell, L., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Vidal, F. (2004). Response selection and motor areas: A behavioural and electrophysiological study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(9), 2164-2174. doi: 10. 1016/j. clinph. 2004. 04. 012.
8. Cattell, J. McK. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373-380. doi: 10. 2307/1411718.
9. Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98(1), 67-83. doi: 10. 1037//0033-2909. 98. 1. 67.
10. Cerella, J. (1994). Generalized slowing in Brinley plots. Journals of Gerontology, 49(2), 65-71.
11. Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., Curran, T. E., & Miller, M. B. (1994). Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? How to answer the question. Developmental Review, 14(2), 159-185. doi: 10. 1006/drev. 1994. 1007.
12. Chen, J., Myerson, J., Hale, S., & Simon, A. (2000). Behavioral evidence for brain-based ability factors in visuospatial information processing. Neuropsychologia, 38(4), 380-387. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(99)00095-0.
13. Cherbuin, N., & Brinkman, C. (2006). Efficiency of callosal transfer and hemispheric interaction. Neuropsychology, 20, 178-184. doi: 10. 1037/0894-4105. 20. 2. 178.
14. Chiang, A., & Atkinson, R. C. (1976). Individual differences and interrelationships among a select set of cognitive skills. Memory & Cognition, 4, 661-672. doi: 10. 3758/BF03213232.
15. Cooper, L. A., & Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503-514. doi: 10. 1037//0096-1523. 2. 4. 503.
16. Corballis, M. C. (2002). Hemispheric interactions in simple reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 40, 423-434. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(01)00097-5.
17. Davis, R. (1959). The role of "attention" in the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 211-220. doi: 10. 1080/17470215908416313.
18. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 122, 371-396. doi: 10. 1037//0096-3445. 122. 3. 371.
19. Der, G., & Deary, I. J. (2006). Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom health and lifestyle survey. Psychology and Aging, 21, 62-73. doi: 10. 1037/0882-7974. 21. 1. 62.
20. Dickman, S. J., & Meyer, D. E. (1988). Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 274-290. doi: 10. 1037//0022-3514. 54. 2. 274.
21. Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. [On the speed of mental processes.] (W. G. Koster, Trans.). In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412-431). Amsterdam: North Holland. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1.
22. Eaton, W. O., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1995). Physical maturation and information-processing speed in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 31, 967-972. doi: 10. 1037//0012-1649. 31. 6. 967.
23. Eckert, M. A., Keren, N. I., Roberts, D. R., Calhoun, V. D., & Harris, K. C. (2010). Age-related changes in processing speed: Unique contributions of cerebellar and prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(10), 1-14. doi: 10. 3389/neuro. 09. 010. 2010.
24. Ellermeier, W., Eigenstetter, M., & Zimmer, K. (2001). Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1464-1473. doi: 10. 1121/1. 1350402.
25. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi: 10. 3758/BF03203267.
26. Everitt, B. S., & Hand, B. J. (1981). Finite mixture distributions. London: Chapman & Hall.
27. Exposito, J., & Andres-Pueyo, A. (1997). The effects of impulsivity on the perceptual and decision stages in a choice reaction time task. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 693-697. doi: 10. 1016/S0191-8869(96)00259-0.
28. Eysenck, H. J. (1986). The theory of intelligence and the psychophysiology of cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3, pp. 1-34). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
29. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347. doi: 10. 1162/089892902317361886.
30. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777-799. doi: 10. 1037//0033-2909. 125. 6. 777.
31. Fisher, D. L., & Glaser, R. A. (1996). Molar and latent models of cognitive slowing: Implications for aging, dementia, depression, development, and intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 458-480. doi: 10. 3758/BF03214549.
32. Fisk, A. D., & Fisher, D. L. (1994). Brinley plots and theories of aging: The explicit, muddled, and implicit debates. Journals of Gerontology, 49(2), 81-89.
33. Fjell, A. M., Ostby, Y., & Walhovd, K. B. (2007). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance and its neural foundation-an important approach in studying the developing and aging mind. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 193-200). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
34. Forstmann, B. U., Jahfari, S., Scholte, H. S., Wolfensteller, U., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2008). Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: A model-based approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 9790-9796. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 1465-08. 2008.
35. Fuguitt, G. V., & Lieberson, S. (1973). Correlation of ratios or difference scores having common terms. Sociological Methodology, 5, 128-144. doi: 10. 2307/270835.
36. Gignac, G. E., & Vernon, P. A. (2004). Reaction time and the dominant and non-dominant hands: An extension of Hick's law. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 733-739. doi: 10. 1016/S0191-8869(03)00133-8.
37. Godefroy, O., Lhullier, C., & Rousseaux, M. (1994). Reliability of reaction time measurements in brain-damaged patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 126, 168-171. doi: 10. 1016/0022-510X(94)90268-2.
38. Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930-944. doi: 10. 1177/0013164406288165.
39. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. doi: 10. 1037//0022-3514. 74. 6. 1464.
40. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 85. 2. 197.
41. Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 47-54. doi: 10. 1037//0882-7974. 16. 1. 47.
42. Hasbroucq, T., Kornblum, S., & Osman, A. M. (1988). A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 207-221.
43. Helmbold, N., Troche, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2007). Processing of temporal and nontemporal information as predictors of psychometric intelligence: A structural-equation-modeling approach. Journal of Personality, 75(5), 985-1006. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-6494. 2007. 00463. x.
44. Hillis, W. D. (1993). Why physicists like models, and why biologists should. Current Biology, 3(2), 79-81.
45. Hillyard, S., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 781-787. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 95. 3. 781.
46. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385. doi: 10. 1177/0146167205275613.
47. Huang, L., Mo, L., & Li, Y. (2012). Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 414-428. doi: 10. 1037/a0026314.
48. Hunt, E. (1978). Mechanics of verbal ability. Psychological Review, 85(2), 109-130. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 85. 2. 109.
49. Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E. (2000). Cross-uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized flashes: Between- and within-subjects variability. Neuropsychologia, 38, 535-541. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(99)00121-9.
50. Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E. (2004). Interhemispheric visuo-motor integration in humans: The role of the superior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 42, 419-425. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2003. 10. 007.
51. Indermühle, R., Troche, S. J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2011). Personality and the psychological refractory period: No evidence for an extraversion- or intelligence-related effect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(3), 214-221. doi: 10. 1037/a0024156.
52. Jensen, A. R. (1985). Methodological and statistical techniques for the chronometric study of mental abilities. In C. R. Reynolds & V. L. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 51-116). New York: Plenum Press.
53. Jensen, A. R. (1992). The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 869-881. doi: 10. 1016/0191-8869(92)90004-9.
54. Jensen, A. R. (1993). Spearman's g: Links between psychometrics and biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 702(1), 103-129. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1749-6632. 1993. tb17244. x.
55. Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Jensen, A. R., & Munro, E. (1979). Reaction time, movement time, and intelligence. Intelligence, 3(2), 121-126. doi: 10. 1016/0160-2896(79)90010-2.
57. Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Temporal expectation and information processing: A model-based analysis. Cognition, 122, 426-441. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2011. 11. 014.
58. Jonides, J., & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44. doi: 10. 1037//0033-2909. 96. 1. 29.
59. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137-172. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 92. 2. 137.
60. Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1997a). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 632-650.
61. Kane, H. D., Proctor, B. E., & Kranzler, J. H. (1997b). Reliability and validity of a non-verbal measure of the speed and efficiency of long-term memory retrieval. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 127-129. doi: 10. 1016/S0191-8869(96)00179-1.
62. Karwoski, T. F., & Schachter, J. (1948). Psychological studies in semantics: III. Reaction times for similarity and difference. Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 103-120. doi: 10. 1080/00224545. 1948. 9921759.
63. Kauranen, K. J., & Vanharanta, H. V. (2001). Relationship between extremities in motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(1), 11-18. doi: 10. 2466/PMS. 92. 1. 11-18.
64. Keating, D. P., & Bobbitt, B. (1978). Individual and developmental differences in cognitive-processing components of mental ability. Child Development, 49, 155-167. doi: 10. 2307/1128604.
65. Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2009). Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: Testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task. Psychological Research, 73, 762-776. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-008-0188-9.
66. Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 12, 391-438.
67. Kirby, N. H., & Nettelbeck, T. (1989). Reaction time and inspection time as measures of intellectual ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 11-14. doi: 10. 1016/0191-8869(89)90171-2.
68. Larson, M., & Clayson, P. (2011). The relationship between cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of performance monitoring. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(2), 159-171. doi: 10. 3758/s13415-010-0018-6.
69. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 219-234. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 2. 219.
70. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
71. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203. doi: 10. 1037//0033-2909. 109. 2. 163.
73. MacLeod, J. W., Lawrence, M. A., McConnell, M. M., Eskes, G. A., Klein, R. M., & Shore, D. I. (2010). Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the attention network test. Neuropsychology, 24, 637-651. doi: 10. 1037/a0019803.
74. Maloney, E. A., Risko, E. F., Preston, F., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2010). Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: The case of the numerical distance effect. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 154-161. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2010. 01. 006.
75. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 86. 4. 287.
76. McConnell, M., & Shore, D. (2011). Mixing measures: Testing an assumption of the attention network test. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 1096-1107. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-010-0085-3.
77. Miles, J. D., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: Are arrows more like locations or words? Psychological Research, 76(6), 777-791. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-011-0378-8.
78. Miller, E. M. (1994). Intelligence and brain myelination: A hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 803-832. doi: 10. 1016/0191-8869(94)90049-3.
79. Miller, J. O., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101-151. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0285(02)00517-0.
80. Miller, J. O., van der Ham, F., & Sanders, A. F. (1995). Overlapping stage models and reaction time additivity: Effects of the activation equation. Acta Psychologica, 90, 11-28. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(95)00028-S.
81. Molenaar, P. C. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (1986). Steps to a formal analysis of the cognitive-energetic model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 62, 237-261. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(86)90090-9.
82. Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
83. Moritz, S., & Andresen, B. (2004). Reduced negative priming in schizotypy: Failure to replicate. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(2), 211-215. doi: 10. 1348/014466504323088060.
84. Moritz, S., & Mass, R. (1997). Reduced cognitive inhibition in schizotypy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(3), 365-376. doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8260. 1997. tb01244. x.
85. Myerson, J., Adams, D. R., Hale, S., & Jenkins, L. (2003). Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q-Q plots, and other conspiracies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 224-237. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196489.
86. Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., & Lawrence, B. (1997). General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability. Acta Psychologica, 96, 83-101. doi: 10. 1016/S0001-6918(97)00002-4.
87. Myerson, J., Robertson, S., & Hale, S. (2007). Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 319-337. doi: 10. 1901/jeab. 2007. 88-319.
88. Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251. doi: 10. 1006/cogp. 2001. 0767.
89. Nettlebeck, T. (1980). Factors affecting reaction time: Mental retardation, brain damage, and other psychopathologies. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 355-401). New York: Academic Press.
90. Neubauer, A. C., Riemann, R., Mayer, R., & Angleitner, A. (1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 885-894.
91. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44-59. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 83. 1. 44.
92. Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 14-29.
93. Ollman, R. T. (1973). Simple reactions with random countermanding of the "go" signal. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 571-581). New York: Academic.
94. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
95. Pashler, H. E. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. doi: 10. 1037//0033-2909. 116. 2. 220.
96. Pashler, H. E., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 19-45.
97. Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 60(1), 489-498. doi: 10. 1098/rspl. 1896. 0076.
98. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
99. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 85. 2. 59.
100. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 111. 2. 333.
101. Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., & McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 1-25. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210723.
102. Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1991). Arm nerve conduction velocity (NCV), brain NCV, reaction time, and intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 33-47. doi: 10. 1016/0160-2896(91)90021-5.
103. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287-290. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 03437.
104. Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1983). Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology, 20, 168-179. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1983. tb03283. x.
105. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
106. Schmiedek, F., Lovden, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 841-857. doi: 10. 1037/a0017799.
107. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 414-429. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 136. 3. 414.
108. Schulte, T., Pfefferbaum, A., & Sullivan, E. V. (2004). Parallel interhemispheric processing in aging and alcoholism: Relation to corpus callosum size. Neuropsychologia, 42, 257-271. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(03)00155-6.
109. Schweizer, K. (1989). Relating reaction time components and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7), 701-707. doi: 10. 1016/0191-8869(89)90116-5.
110. Seashore, S. H., & Seashore, R. H. (1941). Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet and jaws. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(4), 342-345. doi: 10. 1037/h0061571.
111. Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 535-551. doi: 10. 1016/j. paid. 2007. 09. 015.
112. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 84. 2. 127.
113. Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4,(7) e220. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pbio. 0040220.
114. Simonen, R. L., Videman, T., Battie, M. C., & Gibbons, L. E. (1995). Comparison of foot and hand reaction times among men: A methodologic study using simple and multiple-choice repeated measurements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(3), 1243-1249.
115. Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 77-110. doi: 10. 1037/h0020189.
116. Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220-231. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(69)90052-3.
117. Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567-593. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 102. 3. 567.
118. Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463. doi: 10. 1006/jmps. 1999. 1260.
119. Smith, P. L., Ratcliff, R., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: Response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vision Research, 44, 1297-1320. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2004. 01. 002.
120. Smith, G. A., & Stanley, G. (1983). Clocking g: Relating intelligence and measures of timed performance. Intelligence, 7, 353-368. doi: 10. 1016/0160-2896(83)90010-7.
121. Smulders, F. T. Y., & Meijer, E. H. (2008). Extraversion and performance: A cognitive-energetical approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 475-486. doi: 10. 1016/j. paid. 2007. 09. 012.
122. Sriram, N., Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Correlational biases in mean response latency differences. Statistical Methodology, 7(3), 277-291. doi: 10. 1016/j. stamet. 2009. 10. 004.
123. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi: 10. 1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9.
124. Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147-246. doi: 10. 1016/S0001-6918(00)00045-7.
125. Stolz, J. A., Besner, D., & Carr, T. H. (2005). Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated. Visual Cognition, 12, 284-336.
126. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. doi: 10. 1037//0096-3445. 121. 1. 15.
127. Stuss, D. T., Pogue, J., Buckle, L., & Bondar, J. (1994). Characterization of stability of performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: Variability and consistency on reaction time tests. Neuropsychology, 8(3), 316-324. doi: 10. 1037//0894-4105. 8. 3. 316.
128. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 37, 571-590.
129. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18. doi: 10. 1037//0096-1523. 29. 1. 3.
130. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359. doi: 10. 1006/jmps. 1995. 1033.
131. Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. M. (1991). A recruitment theory of force-time relations in the production of brief force pulses: The parallel force unit model. Psychological Review, 98, 268-294. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 98. 2. 268.
132. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108(3), 550-592. doi: 10. 1037//0033-295X. 108. 3. 550.
133. van Ravenzwaaij, D., Brown, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligence. Cognition, 119, 381-393. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2011. 02. 002.
134. Vernon, P. A. (1990). An overview of chronometric measures of intelligence. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 399-410.
135. Vernon, P. A., & Mori, M. (1992). Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence, 16(3-4), 273-288. doi: 10. 1016/0160-2896(92)90010-O.
136. Versace, F., Mazzetti, M., & Codispoti, M. (2008). The temporal stability of the effects induced by the cued reaction time task. Assessment, 15, 145-152. doi: 10. 1177/1073191107308106.
137. Vickers, D. (1970). Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. Ergonomics, 13, 37-58. doi: 10. 1080/00140137008931117.
138. Waechter, S., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2010). Visual word recognition: On the reliability of repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18(4), 537-558. doi: 10. 1080/13506280902868603.
139. Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830-841. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 3. 830.
140. Way, T. C., & Gottsdanker, R. (1968). Psychological refractoriness with varying differences between tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 38-45. doi: 10. 1037/h0026154.
141. Wiers, R. W., van Woerden, N., Smulders, F. T. Y., & De Jong, P. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648-658. doi: 10. 1037//0021-843X. 111. 4. 648.
142. Williams, L. E., Light, G. A., Braff, D. L., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2010). Reduced multisensory integration in patients with schizophrenia on a target detection task. Neuropsychologia, 48(10), 3128-3136. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2010. 06. 028.
143. Williams, R. H., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 59-69. doi: 10. 1177/014662169602000106.
144. Wilson, G. F., & O'Donnell, R. D. (1986). Steady state evoked responses: Correlations with human cognition. Psychophysiology, 23, 57-61. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1986. tb00594. x.
145. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489-525.
146. Yellott, J. I., Jr. (1971). Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 159-199. doi: 10. 1016/0022-2496(71)90011-3.