Aging and intraindmdual variability in performance: Analyses of response time distributions

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 319-337

  Myerson, Joel ^a,b   Robertson, Shannon ^a,b   Hale, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Age differences; Humans; Older adults; Response time; RT distribution; Skew; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 36448929141     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-319     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.
2. Blough, D. S. (2000). Effects of priming, discriminability, and reinforcement on reaction-time components of pigeon visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 50-63.
3. Bunce, D. J., Warr, P. B., & Cochrane, T. (1993). Blocks in choice responding as a function of age and physical fitness. Psychology and Aging, 8, 26-33.
4. Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. In J. E. Birren, & K W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 315-372). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Cerella, J., DiCarra, R., Williams, D., & Bowles, N. (1986). Relations between information processing and intelligence in elderly adults. Intelligence, 10, 75-91.
6. Cerella, J., & Hale, S. (1994). The rise and fall in information-processing rates over the life span. Acta Psychologica, 86, 109-197.
7. Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., & Tukey, P. A. (1983). Graphical methods for data analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8. Ferraro, F. R., & Moody, J. (1996). Consistent and inconsistent performance in young and elderly adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 429-441.
9. Fozard ,J. L., Thomas,J. C., & Waugh, N. C. (1976). Effects of age and frequency of stimulus repetitions on twochoice reaction time. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 556-563.
10. Glimcher, P. W. (2005). Indeterminacy in brain and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 25-56.
11. Glimcher, P. W., Dorris, M. C., & Bayer, H. M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior Special Issue on Neuroeconomics, 52, 213-256.
12. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
13. Heathcote, A. (1996). RTSYS: A DOS application for the analysis of reaction time data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 427-445.
14. Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2002). Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 394-401.
15. Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W. S., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P101-P115.
16. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Luszcz, M. A. (Ed.) (2004). Intraindividual variability, change, and aging [Special issue]. Gerontology, 50, (1)
18. McAuley, T., Yap, M., Christ, S. E., & White, D. A. (2006). Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: Insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 447-458.
19. Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1992). The neuropsychology of memory and aging. In F. I. M. Craik, & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 315-372). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Myerson, J., Adams, D. R., Hale, S., & Jenkins, L. (2003). Analyses of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q-Q plots, and other conspiracies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 224-237.
21. Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1993). General slowing and age invariance in cognitive processing: The other side of the coin. In J. Cerella, J. Rybash, W. Hoyer, & M. L. Commons (Eds.), Adult information processing: Limits on loss (pp. 115-141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Myerson, J., Hale, S., Hirschman, R., Hansen, C., & Christiansen, B. (1989). Global increase in response latencies by early middle age: Complexity effects in individual performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 353-362.
23. Neuringer, A. (2002). Operant variability: Evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 672-705.
24. Rabbitt, P., Osman, P., Moore, B., & Stollery, B. (2001). There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 981-1003.
25. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
26. nd ed.) (pp. 1-90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Robertson, S., Myerson,J., & Hale, S. (2006). Are there age differences in intraindividual variability in working memory performance? Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, P18-P24.
28. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Speckman, P., Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 195-223.
29. Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Attentional blocks are not responsible for age-related slowing. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P263-P270.
30. Shammi, P., Bosman, E., & Stuss, D. T. (1998). Aging and variability in performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 1-13.
31. Smith, G. A., Poon, L. W., Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (1988). A regular relationship between old and young adults' latencies on their best, average and worst trials. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 195-210.
32. Spieler, D., Balota, D., & Faust, M. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479.
33. Stebbins, W. C. (1962). Response latency as a function of amount of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 305-307.
34. Stebbins, W. C., & Miller, J. M. (1964). Reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity for the monkey. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 309-312.
35. Stuss, D. T., Murphy, K.J., Binns, M. A., & Alexander, M. P. (2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain, 126, 2363-2380.
36. Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Animal Behavior Monographs, 1, 84.
37. West, R. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272-292.
38. West, R. (1999). Age differences in lapses of intention in the Stroop task. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P34-P43.
39. West, R., Murphy, K. J., Armilio, M. L., Craik, F. I. M., & Stuss, D. T. (2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain and Cognition, 49, 402-419.