Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 77, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  McLaughlin, Jacqueline E ^a   Griffin, LaToya M ^a   Esserman, Denise A ^b   Davidson, Christopher A ^a   Glatt, Dylan M ^a   Roth, Mary T ^a   Gharkholonarehe, Nastaran ^a   Mumper, Russell J ^a  

^a University of North Carolina   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance learning; Flipped classroom; Pharmaceutics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; DISTANCE LEARNING; EDUCATION; FEMALE; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHARMACEUTICS; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

DISTANCE LEARNING; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; PHARMACEUTICS;

ADULT; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887560428     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe779196     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Vlasses PH. ACPE and pharmacy schools: quality assurance versus quantity assurance. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ PharmacyFoundationf.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2012.
2. Kidd RS, Stamatakis MK. Comparison of students' performance and satisfaction of a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1): Article 10.
3. Lenz TL, Monaghan MS, Wilson AF, Tilleman JA, Jones RM, Hayes MM. Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(4):Article 90.
4. MacLaughlin EJ, Supernaw RB, Howard KA. Impact of distancelearning using videoconferencing technology on student performance. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(3):Article 58.
5. Reid LD, McKenzie M. A preliminary report on the academic performance of pharmacy students in a distance education program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(3):Article 65.
6. Mobley WC. Adaptation of a hypertext pharmaceutics course for videoconference-based distance education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(2):140-143.
7. Larreamendy-Joerns J, Leinhardt G. Going the distance with online education. Rev Educ Res. 2006;76(4):567-605.
8. Vrasidas C, McIsaac M. Factors influencing interaction in an online course. Am J Distance Educ. 1999;13(3):22-36.
9. Lee HJ, Rha I. Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Educ Technol Soc. 2009;12(4):372-382.
10. Stein DS, Wanstreet CE, Calvin J, Overtoom C, Wheaton JE. Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. Am J Distance Educ. 2005;19(2):105-118.
11. Alsharif NZ, Galt KA. Evaluation of an instructional model to teach clinically relevant medicinal chemistry in a campus and a distance pathway. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 31.
12. Henriksen B, Roche V. Creation of medicinal chemistry learning communities through enhanced technology and interdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(8):Article 158.
13. Mehvar, R. A participation requirement to engage students in a pharmacokinetics course synchronously taught at a local and distant campus. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):Article 118.
14. Steinberg M, Morin AK. Academic performance in a pharmacotherapeutics course sequence taught synchronously on two campuses using distance education technology. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(8):Article 150.
15. Moore MG, Kearsley G. Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning; 2012.
16. Lear JL, Ansorge C, Steckelberg A. Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment. J Online Learn Teach. 2010:6(1). http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/lear_0310.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2012.
17. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.
18. Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science. 2011;332(6031):862-864.
19. Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31 (1):30-43.
20. Foertsch J, Moses G, Strikwerda J, Litzkow M. Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using eTEACH web-based streaming video software. J Eng Educ. 2002;91(3):267-274.
21. Kuh GD, Kinzie J, Buckley J, Bridges B, Hayek J C. Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions, and Recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
22. Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP. Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Res High Educ. 2006;47(1):1-32.
23. Yorke M. Retention, persistence and success in on-campus higher education, and their enhancement in open and distance learning. Open Learn. 2004;19(1).
24. Richard C, Rahman A, Kidd RS. Student pharmacists' use and perceived impact of educational technologies. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(5):Article 92.
25. Culver S. Course grades, quality of student engagement, and students' evaluation of instructor. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2010;22(3):331-336.
26. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Stud High Educ. 2002;27(1):27-52. http://www. itl.usyd.edu.au/programs/P%26P/lizzio_wilson_simons.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2012.
27. Gleason BL, Peeters MJ, Resman-Targoff BH, et al. An activelearning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(9):Article 186.
28. UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy. Active learning techniques: alternatives to traditional lectures. https://learn.pharmacy.unc.edu/ alt/. Accessed October 2, 2012.
29. Kee TP. The one minute lecture. Educ Chem. 1995;32:100-101.
30. Anderson LW, Krathwohl, DR, eds. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.
31. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans, Green; 1956.
32. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. University of Michigan: Sage Publications; 1990.
33. Cain J, Black EP, Rohr J. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(2):Article 21.
34. Ernst H, Colthorpe K. Expanding voluntary active-learning opportunities. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 28.
35. Persky A. Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 36.
36. Pierce R, Cox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a "flipped classroom" model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(10):Article 196.
37. Blouin RA, Joyner PU, Pollack GM. Preparing for a renaissance in pharmacy education: the need, opportunity, and capacity for change. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 42.
38. Blouin RA, Riffee WH, Robinson ET, et al. Roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8): Article 154.