Impact of distance learning using videoconferencing technology on student performance

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1-6

  MacLaughlin, Eric J ^a,b   Supernaw, Robert B ^a   Howard, Kellee A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance learning; Pharmacotherapy; Pharmacy; Student performance; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 14844293917     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj680358     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Distance Learning Glossary. United States Distance Learning Association. Available at: http://www.usdla.org/html/resources/dictionary.htm#d. Accessed 07/10/03.
2. Moe MT. Emerging trends in post secondary education: the view to 2012. Think Equity Partners. Available at: http://www.usdla.org/ppt/thinkequity.ppt. Accessed July 10, 2003.
3. Hunter TS, Deziel-Evans L, Marsh WA. Assuring excellence in distance pharmaceutical education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:1-25.
4. Chung UK. Maintaining qualtiy pharmaceutical education in the digital age. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60:943-946.
5. Allen M, Bourhis J, Mabry E, Burrell N, Timmerman E, Titsworth S. Comparing distance education to face-to-face methods of education. In: Gayle B, Preiss R, Burrell N, Allen M, eds. Classroom and Communication Education Research: Advances through meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; In press.
6. Allen M, Mabry E, Mattrey M, Bourhis J, Titsworth S, Burrell N. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: a comparison using meta-analysis. Paper presented at: Communication Education Division, National Communication Association Convention; November 2001, 2001; Atlanta, GA.
7. Callahan AL, Givens PE, Bly RG. Distance education moves into the 21st century: a comparison of delivery methods. Paper presented at: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition; June 1998, 1998; Seattle, Washington.
8. Navarro P, Shoemaker J. The power of cyberlearning: an empirical test. J Comput Higher Educ. 1999;11.
9. Wade WE, Cobb HH, III, Spruill WJ, Chisholm MA. Assessment of student performance in an advanced pharmacokinetics course taught by three methods of instructional delivery. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63:82-85.
10. Chisholm MA, Miller AW, Spruill WJ, et al. Influence of interactive videoconferencing on the performance of pharmacy students and instructors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:152-158.
11. Clark D. Learning domains or bloom's taxonomy. Available at: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html. Accessed December 6, 2002.
12. Allen M, Bourhis J, Burrell N, Mabry E. Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: a meta-analysis. Am J Distance Educ. 2002;16:83-97.
13. Guide #10: Interactive videoconferencing in distance education. Engineering Outreach, College of Engineering, University of Idaho. June 18, 2002. Available at: http://www.uidaho.edu/eo/dist10.html. Accessed December 2, 2002.