Student pharmacists' use and perceived impact of educational technologies

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Stolte, Scott K ^a   Richard, Craig ^a   Rahman, Ateequr ^a   Kidd, Robert S ^a  

^a SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E mail; Learning preferences; Pharmacy student; Technology; Teleconferencing; Web

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; E-MAIL; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; LEARNING PREFERENCES; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TECHNOLOGY; TELECONFERENCE; WEB; YOUNG ADULT;

E-MAIL; LEARNING PREFERENCES; PHARMACY STUDENT; TECHNOLOGY; TELECONFERENCING; WEB;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PHARMACISTS; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959615779     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75592     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Brill JM, Galloway C. Perils and promises: university instructors' integration of technology in classroom-based practices. Br J Educ Technol. 2007;38(1):95-105.
2. Brazeau GA. Teaching, practice and technology. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(3):Article 57.
3. Sanders R. The ''imponderable bloom'': reconsidering the role of technology in education. Innovate. 2006;2(6). http://innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue6/The__Imponderable_Bloom_-__Reconsidering_the_Role_of_Technology_in_Education.pdf. Accessed May, 10, 2011.
4. Ehrmann SC. Beyond computer literacy: implications of technology for the content of a college education. Liberal Educ. 2004;90(4):6-13.
5. DiPiro JT. Balancing technology with personal interaction in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(4):440-442.
6. Kuh GD, Hu S. The relationship between computer and information technology use, selected learning and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. J Coll Stud Dev. 2001;42(3):217-232.
7. Lenz TL, Monaghan MS, Wilson AF, Tilleman JA, Jones RM, Hayes MM. Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(4):Article 90.
8. Kidd RS, Stamatakis MK. Comparison of students' performance and satisfaction of a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1): Article 10.
9. Brennan Congdon H, Nutter DA, Charneski L, Butko P. Impact of hybrid delivery of education on student academic performance and the student experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(7):Article 121.
10. McKay A. Anatomy of a pharmacy school startup: part 1. J Pharm Teach. 2003;10(1):31-80.
11. McKay A, Stull R. Anatomy of a pharmacy school startup: part 2. J Pharm Teach. 2004;11(1):57-160.
12. McKay A, Stull R, Robinson E. Anatomy of a pharmacy school startup: part 3. J Pharm Teach. 2005;11(2):65-114.
13. Willcockson IU, Phelps CL. Keeping learning central: a model for implementing emerging technologies. Med Educ Online. 2010;15(0):4275.
14. Rovai AP, Wighting MJ, Baker JD, Grooms LD. Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. Internet and Higher Educ. 2009;12(1):7-13.
15. Tang TL, Austin MJ. Student's perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1241-1255.
16. Kincaid JP, Braby R, Mears J. Electronic authoring and delivery of technical information. J Instr Dev. 1988;11(2):8-13.
17. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(4):350-353.
18. Speedie SM. Reliability: the accuracy of a test. Am J Pharm Educ. 1985;49(4):76-79.
19. Ong C-S, Lai J-Y. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Comput in Hum Behav. 2006;22(5):816-829.
20. Bollmeier SG, Wenger PJ, Fornash AB. Impact of online lecturecapture on student outcomes in a therapeutic course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):2-6.
21. von Kosky BR, Ivins J, Gribble SJ. Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: a comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian J Educ Technol. 2009;25(4): 581-595.
22. Traphagan T, Kucsera JV, Kishi K. Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educ Tech Research Dev. 2010;58(1):19-37.