A unified classification of two-stage DEA models

Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-16

  Halkos, George E ^a   Tzeremes, Nickolaos G ^a   Kourtzidis, Stavros A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887531138     PISSN: 18767354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Yang F., Wu D., Liang L., Bi G., Wu D.D. Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Annals of Operations Research 2011, 185:195-211.
2. Sexton T., Lewis H. Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2003, 19:227-249.
3. Ross A. Performance-based strategic resource allocation in supply networks. International Journal of Production Economics 2000, 63:255-266.
4. Ross A., Droge C. An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. Journal of Operations Management 2002, 20:19-32.
5. Wong B., Luque M., Yang J.B. Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgments. Computers & Operations Research 2009, 36:623-636.
6. Ross A., Droge C. An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. Journal of Operations Management 2004, 21:673-688.
7. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
8. Wang C.H., Gopal R.D., Zionts S. Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research 1997, 73:191-213.
9. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science 1999, 45:1270-1288.
10. Kao C., Hwang S.-H. Efficiency measurements for network systems: IT impact of firm performance. Decision Support Systems 2010, 48:437-446.
11. Cook W., Liang L., Zhu J. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective, Omega-International. Journal of Management Science 2010, 38:423-430.
12. Castelli L., Pesenti R., Ukovich W. A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making unit is considered. Annals of Operations Research 2010, 173:207-235.
13. Li Y., Chen Y., Liang L., Xie J. DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 2012, 40:611-618.
14. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
15. Chen Y., Zhu J. Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management 2004, 5:9-22.
16. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver 2003, Springer, Springer Science Business Media, LLC, New York.
17. Liu J.S., Lu W.-M. Network-based method for ranking efficient units in two-stage DEA models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2012, 63:1153-1164.
18. Shephard R.W. Theory of Cost and Production 1970, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
19. Shephard R.W., Färe R. A Dynamic Theory of Production Correspondence 1975, ORC UC Berkley, Berkley.
20. Avrikan N.K. Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks. Omega 2009, 37:930-941.
21. Moreno P., Lozano S. A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA. Annals of Operations Research 2012, 10.1007/s10479-012-1074-9.
22. Lin T.-Y., Chiu S.-H. Using independent component analysis and network DEA to improve bank performance evaluation. Economic Modelling 2013, 32:608-616.
23. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2000, 34:35-49.
24. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Whittaker G. Network DEA. Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis 2007, 209-240. Springer, New York. J. Zhu, W.D. Cook (Eds.).
25. Färe R., Whittaker G. An intermediate input model of diary production using complex survey data. Journal of Agricultural Economics 1995, 46:201-223.
26. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lee W.F. Property rights and profitability. New Directions: Efficiency and Productivity 2004, 56-77. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. R. Färe, S. Grosskopf (Eds.).
27. Chang T.S., Tone K., Wei Q. Ownership-specified network DEA models. Annals of Operations Research 2011, 10.1007/s10479-011-0949-5.
28. Prieto A.M., Zofio J.L. Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 178:292-304.
29. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economic Letters 1996, 50:65-70.
30. Kao C., Hwang S. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:418-429.
31. Liang L., Cook W., Zhu J. DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics 2008, 55:643-653.
32. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:243-252.
33. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Efficiency and productivity in rich and poor countries. Studies in International Economics 1997, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. B.S. Jensen, K. Wong (Eds.).
34. Nemota J., Gota M. Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Economic Letters 1999, 64:51-56.
35. Jaenicke E.C. Testing for intermediate outputs in dynamic DEA models: Accounting for soil capital in rotational crop production and productivity measures. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 14:247-266.
36. Nemota J., Gota M. Measuring dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2003, 19:191-210.
37. Chen C.M. A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 194:687-699.
38. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. OMEGA 2010, 38:145-156.
39. Färe R., Grabowski R., Kraft S. Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: A non-parametric approach. Economic Letters 1997, 56:187-193.
40. Lothgren M., Tambour M. Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research 1999, 115:449-458.
41. Chen Y., Liang L., Yang F., Zhu J. Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Computers & Operations Research 2006, 33:1368-1379.
42. Golany B., Hackman S.T., Passy U. An efficiency measurement framework for multi-stage production systems. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 145:51-68.
43. Chen Y., Cook W.D., Li N., Zhu J. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:1170-1176.
44. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S. Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37:8799-8808.
45. Kao C., Hwang S.-N. Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 211:515-519.
46. Liu S.T. A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 212:606-608.
47. Chen Y., Liang L., Zhu J. Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 193:600-604.
48. Chen Y., Cook W.D., Zhu J. Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage process. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 202:138-142.
49. R. Färe, G. Karagiannis, The denominator rule for share-weighting aggregation, mimeo (2013).
50. Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192:949-962.
51. Hsieh L.F., Lin L.H. A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan: An application of the relational network DEA. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2010, 29:14-24.
52. Guan J., Chen K. Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China's high-tech innovations. Technovation 2010, 30:348-358.
53. Lozano S. Scale and cost efficiency analysis of network processes. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38:6612-6617.
54. Cook W., Zhu J., Bi G., Yang F. Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 207:1122-1129.
55. Premachandra I.M., Zhu J., Watson J., Galagedera D.U.A. Best-performing US mutual funds families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition. Journal of Banking & Finance 2012, 36:3302-3317.
56. Guan J., Chen K. Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy 2012, 41:102-115.
57. Chen Y., Du J., Sherman D., Zhu J. DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 207:339-349.
58. Liang L., Li Z.-Q., Cook W.D., Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis efficiency two-stage networks with feedback. IIE Transactions 2011, 43:309-322.
59. Liang L., Yang F., Cook W., Zhu J. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 145:35-49.
60. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis With Spreadsheets 2009, Springer, Springer Science Business Media, LLC, New York.
61. Zhu J., Cook W. Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis 2007, Springer Springer Science Business Media, LLC, New York.
62. Du J., Liang L., Chen Y., Cook W., Zhu J. A bargaining game model for measuring performance of the two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 210:390-397.
63. Chen Y., Liang L., Yang F. A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 145:5-13.
64. Akther S., Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. Estimating two-stage slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking. OMEGA 2013, 41:88-96.
65. Amirteimoori A. A DEA two-stage decision process with shared resources. Central European Journal of Operational Research 2013, 21:141-151.
66. Bi G., Ding J., Luo Y., Liang L. Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2011, 35:4270-4280.
67. Chen K., Guan J. Measuring the efficiency of China's regional innovation systems: Application of network data envelopment analysis (DEA). Regional Studies 2012, 46:355-377.
68. Y. Chen, W.D. Cook, N. Li, J. Zhu, Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA, in: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, 2008.
69. Chen C., Zhu J., Yu J.-Y, Noori H. A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2012, 221:348-359.
70. Chilingerian J., Sherman H.D. Health care applications: From hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis 2004, 265-298. Springer, Boston. W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford, J. Zhu (Eds.).
71. Chiu Y., Huang C., Ma C.M. Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 209:95-103.
72. Chiu Y.-H., Huang C.-W., Ma C.-M. Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 209:95-103.
73. Chiu Y.-H., Huang C.-W., Chen Y.-C. The R&D value-chain efficiency measurement for high-tech industries in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2012, 29:989-1006.
74. Cook W.D., Hababou M., Tuenter H.J.H. Multicompetent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: An application to scales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 14:209-224.
75. Fukuyama H., Matousek R. Efficiency of Turkish banking: Two-stage network system. Variable returns to scale model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 2011, 21:75-91.
76. Fukuyama H., Mirdehghan S.M. Identifying the efficient status in network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2012, 220:85-92.
77. Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. OMEGA 2010, 38:398-409.
78. Ho C.-T., Oh K.B. Measuring online stockbroking performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2008, 108:988-1004.
79. Ho C.-T., Zhu D.-S. Performance measurement of Taiwan's commercial banks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2004, 53:425-434.
80. Ho M.H.-C., Liu J.S., Lu W.-M., Huang C.-C. A new perspective to explore the technology transfer efficiencies in US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 2013, 10.1007/s10961-013-9298-7.
81. Holod D., Lewis H.F. Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model. Journal of Banking & Finance 2011, 35:2801-2810.
82. Hung S.-W., Wang A.-P Entrepreneurs with glamour? DEA performance characterization of high-tech and older-established industries. Economic Modelling 2012, 29:1146-1153.
83. Kao C. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:1107-1112.
84. Kao C. Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2012, 63:64-71.
85. Kao C., Lin P.-H. Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2012, 198:83-98.
86. Kao C., Liu S.-T. Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2011, 176:20-35.
87. Lewis H.F., Sexton T.R. Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research 2004, 31:1365-1410.
88. Liu S.-T., Wang R.-T. Efficiency measures of PCB manufacturing firms using relational two-stage data envelopment analysis. Expert System with Applications 2009, 36:4935-4939.
89. Lo S.-F. Performance evaluation for sustainable business: A profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2010, 17:311-319.
90. Lozano S. Process efficiency of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2013, 10.1016/j.fss.2013.05.012.
91. Lozano S., Gutierrez E., Moreno P. Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2013, 37:1665-1676.
92. Lu W.M. Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan. Economic Modelling 2012, 29:1081-1089.
93. Lu W.M., Wang W.K., Hung S.W., Lu E.T. The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transportation Research, Part E 2012, 48:529-544.
94. Lu W.-M., Wang W.-K, Tung W.-T., Lin F. Capability and efficiency of intellectual capital: The case of fables companies in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37:546-555.
95. Luo X. Evaluation the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56:627-635.
96. Meepadung N., Tang J.C.S., Khang D.B. IT-based banking services: Evaluating operating and profit efficiency at bank braches. Journal of High Technology Management Research 2009, 20:145-152.
97. Mukherjee A., Nath P., Pal M. Resource, service quality and performance triad: a framework for measuring efficiency of banking service. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2003, 54:723-735.
98. Naini S.G.J., Moini A., Rezaee M.J. Nash bargaining game model for two parallel stage process evaluation with shared inputs. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013, 67:475-484.
99. Narasimhan R., Talluri S., Das A. Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management 2004, 22:91-106.
100. Nemoto J., Goto M. Measuring of dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2003, 19:191-210.
101. Rho S., An J. Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research 2007, 14:395-410.
102. Saranga H., Moser R. Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 207:197-205.
103. Sheu H.-J., Lo S.-F., Lin H.-H. Linking diversification strategy to performance. Journal of Transnational Management 2006, 11:61-79.
104. Tsolas I.E. Modeling bank branch profitability and effectiveness by means of DEA. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2010, 59:432-451.
105. Tsolas I.E. Relative profitability and stock market performance of listed commercial banks on the Athens exchange: a non-parametric approach. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2011, 22:323-342.
106. von Geymueller P. Static versus dynamic DEA in electrisity regulation: the case of US transmission system operators. Central European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 17:397-413.
107. Wang C.-H., Lu Y.-H., Huang C.-W., Lee J.-Y. R&D productivity, and market value: An empirical study from high technology firms. OMEGA 2013, 41:143-155.
108. Wanke P.F. Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage network-DEA approach. Transport Policy 2013, 29:145-153.
109. Xie B.-C., Fan Y., Qu Q.-Q. Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China's power system. Applied Energy 2012, 96:261-271.
110. Zha Y., Liang L. Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 205:332-338.
111. Zhou Z., Sun L., Yang W., Liu W., Ma C. A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2013, 64:103-108.
112. Zhu J. Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra 2011, 4:260-269.
113. Zhu J. Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research 2000, 123:105-124.
114. O'Leary-Kelly S.W., Flores B.E. The integration of manufacturing and marketing/sales decisions: impact on organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management 2002, 20:221-240.
115. Graves S.C., Willems S.P. Supply chain design: Safety stock placement and supply chain configuration. Handbooks in operations Research and Management Science 2003, 11:95-132.
116. Bertrand J.W.M. Supply chain design: Flexibility considerations. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 2003, 11:133-198.
117. Cachon G.P. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 2003, 11:227-339.
118. Chen F. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 2003, 11:341-421.
119. Wu D., Olson D. Supply chain risk, simulation and vendor selection. International Journal of Production Economics 2008, 114:646-655.