Supply chain DEA: Production possibility set and performance evaluation model

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 185, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 195-211

  Yang, Feng ^a   Wu, Dexiang ^a   Liang, Liang ^a   Bi, Gongbing ^a   Wu, Desheng Dash ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Constant return to scale (CRS); Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Performance evaluation; Production possibility set; Supply chain management (SCM)

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951579406     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-008-0511-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Altiok, T., & Ranjan, R. (1995). Multi-stage, pull-type production/inventory systems. IIE Transactions, 27, 190-200.
2. China Construction Bank (Anhui Branch) (2004). Annual report 2004 of China Construction Bank in Anhui Province (in Chinese).
3. Camm, J. D., Chorman, T. E., Dull, F. A., Evans, J. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Wegryn, G. W. (1997). Blending OR/MS, judgment, and GIS: restructuring P& G's supply chain. Interfaces, 27(1), 128-142.
4. Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 465-476.
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
6. Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Yang, F. (2006). A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency. Annals of Operations Research, 1451, 5-13.
7. Clarke, R. L., & Gourdin, K. N. (1991). Measuring the efficiency of the logistics process. Journal of Business Logistics, 122, 17-33.
8. Cohen, M. A., & Lee, H. L. (1989). Resource deployment analysis of global manufacturing and distribution networks. Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management, 2, 81-104.
9. Easton, L., Murphy, D. J., & Pearson, J. N. (2002). Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8, 123-134.
10. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 341, 35-49.
11. Golany, B., Hackman, S. T., & Passy, U. (2003). An efficiency measurement framework for multi-stage production systems. Annals of Operations Research, 1451, 51-68.
12. Ishii, K., Takahashi, K., & Muramatsu, R. (1988). Integrated production, inventory and distribution systems. International Journal of Production Research, 263, 473-482.
13. Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1993). Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research, 41, 835-847.
14. Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research, 319, 1365-1410.
15. Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of operation research, 1451, 35-49.
16. Lothgren, M., & Tambour, M. (1999). Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 449-458.
17. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Das, A. (2004). Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 91-106.
18. Newhart, D. D., Stott, K. L., & Vasko, F. J. (1993). Consolidating production sizes to minimize inventory levels for a multi-stage production and distribution systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 447, 637-644.
19. Ross, A., & Droge, C. (2002). An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 19-32.
20. Ross, A., & Droge, C. (2004). An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 673-688.
21. Talluri, S., & Baker, R. C. (2002). A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. European Journal of Operational Research141(3), 546-560. This paper is ranked 21 in highly requested papers in EJOR from April 2002-April 2004 with 1, 114 requests.
22. Troutt, M. D., Ambrose, P., & Chan, C. K. (2001). Optimal throughput for multistage input-output processes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(1), 148-158.
23. Troutt, M. D., Ambrose, P., & Chan, C. K. (2004). Multi-stage efficiency tools for goal setting and monitoring in supply chains. In C. K. Chan & H. W. J. Lee (Eds.), Successful strategies in supply chain management Hershey: Idea Group Publishing Co.
24. Voudouris, V. T. (1996). Mathematical programming techniques to debottleneck the supply chain of fine chemical industries. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 20, S1269-S1274.
25. Weber, C. A., & Desai, A. (1996). Determinants of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 142-155.
26. Wu, D. (2008). A note on dea efficiency assessment using ideal point: an improvement of Wang and Luo's model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 183(2), 819-830.
27. Wu, D. (2009). Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(1), 227-235.
28. Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 46, 2313-2327.
29. Wu, D., Yang, Z., & Liang, L. (2006). Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian Bank. Expert Systems with Applications31(1), 108-115.