A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 103-108

  Zhou, Zhongbao ^a   Sun, Liang ^a   Yang, Wenyu ^a   Liu, Wenbin ^a,b   Ma, Chaoqun ^a  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency decomposition; Nash bargaining game; Performance evaluation; Two stage systems

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DECOMPOSITION; GAME THEORY;

CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANKS; DECISION MAKING UNIT; EFFICIENCY DECOMPOSITION; NASH BARGAINING GAME; NONPARAMETRIC APPROACHES; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; TWO STAGE SYSTEM;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84869122027     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2012.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Amin, G. R., & Toloo, M. (2004). A polynomial-time algorithm for finding [var epsilon] in DEA models. Computers and Operations Research, 31(5), 803-805. (Pubitemid 38135879)
2. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3-4), 181-186.
3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. (Pubitemid 9402758)
4. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170-1176.
5. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, G. E., & Battese, C. J. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
6. Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2010). Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective. Omega, 38(6), 423-430.
7. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
8. Du, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(2), 390-397.
9. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245-259. (Pubitemid 32385018)
10. Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics letters, 50(1), 65-70.
11. Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3), 949-962.
12. Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418-429. (Pubitemid 47418455)
13. Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(7), 643-653.
14. Mehrabian, S., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Alirezaee, M. R., & Amin, G. R. (2000). An assurance interval for the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models. Operations Research, 48(2), 344-347.
15. Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155-162.
16. Nash, J. F. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21(1), 128-140.
17. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288. (Pubitemid 30498710)
18. Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., & Dyson, R. G. (1996). A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. Omega, 24(3), 229-244. (Pubitemid 126164272)
19. Yang, F., Wu, D., Liang, L., Bi, G., & Wu, D. D. (2011). Supply chain DEA: Production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Annals of Operations Research, 185(1), 195-211.
20. Zhu, J. (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
21. Zhou, Z., Zhao, L., Lui, S., & Ma, C. (2012). A generalized fuzzy DEA/AR performance assessment model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 55(11-12), 2117-2128.