Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks

Management Science

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1270-1288

  Seiford, Lawrence M ^a   Zhu, Joe ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MARKETING;

COMMERCIAL BANKS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA);

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0033365646     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ali, A. I., Lawrence M. Seiford. 1990. Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. Letters 9 403-405.
2. _, _. 1993a. Computational accuracy and infinitesimals in data envelopment analysis. INFOR 31 290-297.
3. _, _. 1993b. The mathematical programming approach to efficiency measurement. Harold O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, Shelton S. Schmidt, eds. The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Andersen, P., N. C. Petersen. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. 39 1261-1264.
5. Athanassopoulos, Antreas D. 1998. Nonparametric frontier models for assessing the market and cost efficiency of large-scale bank branch networks. J. Money, Credit, and Banking 2 172-192.
6. Banker, R. D. 1984. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European J. Oper. Res. 17 35-44.
7. _, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. 30 1078-1092.
8. _, R. M. Thrall. 1992. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European J. Oper. Res. 62 74-84.
9. Barr, R. D., Lawrence M. Seiford, T. F. Siems. 1993. An envelopment-analysis approach to measuring the managerial efficiency of banks. Ann. Oper. Res. 45 1-19.
10. _, _, _. 1994. Forecasting bank failure: A non-parametric frontier estimation approach. Rech. Econom. Louvain 60 417-429.
11. Berger, A. N., D. D. Humphrey. 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European J. Oper. Res. 98(April) 175-212.
12. Byrnes, P., R. Färe, S. Grosskopf. 1984. Measuring productive efficiency: an application to Illinois strip mines. Management Sci. 23 671-681.
13. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European J. Oper. Res. 2 429-444.
14. _, _, Z. M. Huang, D. B. Sun. 1990. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to larger commercial banks. J. Econometrics 46 73-91.
15. _, _, R. M. Thrall. 1991. A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 2 197-237.
16. _, _, A. Y. Lewin, Lawrence M. Seiford. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
17. Cooper, W. W., Lawrence M. Seiford, Joe Zhu. 1999. A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA. Forthcoming in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
18. Grifell-Tatje, E., C. A. K. Lovell. Profits and productivity. Management Sci. 45(9) 1177-1193.
19. Harker, P. T., S. A. Zenios. 1999. Financial Institutions: Efficiency, Innovation, Regulations. In press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
20. Lewin, Arie Y., Lawrence M. Seiford. 1997. From Efficiency Calculations to a New Approach for Organizing and Analyzing Data: DEA Fifteen Years Later. Baltzer Science Publishers, Bussum, The Netherlands.
21. MacAllister, P. H., D. Macmanus. 1993. Resolving the scale efficiency puzzle in banking. J. Banking and Finance 17 389-405.
22. Oral, H., R. Yolanlan. 1990. An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches. European J. Oper. Res. 46 282-294.
23. Ray, S., Lawrence M. Seiford, Joe Zhu. 1998. Chinese state-owned enterprises behave as market entities: DEA and translog production frontier approaches. OMEGA 26 263-278.
24. Rhoades, S. A. 1993. Efficiency effects of horizontal (in-market) bank mergers. J. Banking and Finance 17 411-422.
25. Seiford, Lawrence M., Joe Zhu. 1996. Context-dependent data envelopment analysis: Measuring attractiveness and progress. SQPL Research Report 96-5, MIE, 219 ELAB, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
26. _, _. 1999a. An investigation of returns to scale under data envelopment analysis. OMEGA 27 1-11.
27. _, _. 1999b. Sensitivity and stability of the classification of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 12 55-75.
28. _, _. 1999c. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR 37(May) 174-187.
29. Sexton, T. R., R. H. Silkman, A. J. Hogan. 1986. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey Bass and American Evaluation Association, San Francisco, CA. 73-105.
30. Sherman, H. D., F. Gold. 1985. Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis. J. Banking and Finance 9 297-315.
31. _, G. Ladino. 1995. Managing bank productivity using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Interfaces 25 60-73.
32. Soteriou, A., S. A. Zenios. Operations, quality and profitability in the provision of banking services. Management Sci. 45(9) 1221-1238.
33. rd Ed. Macmillan, New York.
34. Tversky, A., I. Simonson. 1993. Context-dependent preferences. Management Sci. 39 1179-1189.
35. Vassiloglou, M., D. Giokas. 1990. A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41 591-597.
36. Zhu, Joe. 1996a. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European J. Oper. Res. 90 451-460.
37. _. 1996b. Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47 136-150.
38. _. 1999. Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. Forthcoming in European J. Oper. Res.
39. _, Z. Shen. 1995. A discussion of testing DMUs' returns to scale. European J. Oper. Res. 81 590-596.