A test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 44, 2013, Pages 17915-17920

  Park, Daniel S ^a   Daniel, Potter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGION; CARDUEAE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHLOROPLAST; CLADISTICS; DNA MARKER; INVASIVE SPECIES; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; WEED;

ASTERACEAE; EVOLUTIONARY RELATEDNESS; EXOTIC SPECIES;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ASTERACEAE; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CALIFORNIA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84887033986     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309948110     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: The role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97(2):153-166.
2. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Divers Distrib 10(2):135-141.
3. Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE (2008) The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front Ecol Environ 6(5): 238-246.
4. Mack RN, LonsdaleWM (2001) Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience 51(2):95-102.
5. Pimentel D (2009) Invasive Plants: Their Role in Species Extinctions and Economic Losses to Agriculture in the USA. Management of Invasive Weeds, Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, ed Inderjit (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), Vol 5, pp 1-7.
6. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn M, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasive plants: State of the art. Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis, eds Monney HA, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei PJ, Waage J (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 104-161.
7. Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Sol D (2003) The ecology of bird introductions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:71-98.
8. Wittenberg R, Cock MJW, eds (2001) Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices (CAB International Wallingford, Oxon, UK), pp xvii-228.
9. Andreu J, Vila M (2010) Risk analysis of potential invasive plants in Spain. J Nat Conserv 18(1):34-44.
10. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: Predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evolut 16(4):199-204.
11. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298(5596):1233-1236.
12. Forsyth DM, Duncan RP, Bomford M, Moore G (2004) Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conserv Biol 18(2):557-569.
13. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52(3):273-288.
14. Baker J, Bomford M (2009) Opening the climate modelling envelope. Plant Protect Qtly 24(3 Special Issues SI):88-91.
15. Mack RN (2000) Assessing the extent, status, and dynamism of plant invasions: Current and emerging approaches. Invasive species in a changing world, eds Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 141-168.
16. Reaser JK, Meyerson LA, Von Holle B (2008) Saving camels from straws: How propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion. Biol Invasions 10(7):1085-1098.
17. Mack RN, et al. (2000) Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10(3):689-710.
18. Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA), Vol 40, pp 81-102.
19. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M (2000) Plant Invasions: The Role of Mutualisms (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 65-93.
20. Pysek P, Richardson DM(2007) Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? Biological Invasions, Ecological Studies, ed Nentwig W (Springer, Berlin), Vol 193, pp 97-125.
21. Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15(1):22-40.
22. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77(6):1655-1661.
23. Rejmanek M (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch. Biol Conserv 78(1-2):171-181.
24. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions- the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75(1):65-93.
25. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: Seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159(4):396-419.
26. Hallett SG (2006) Dislocation from coevolved relationships: A unifying theory for plant invasion and naturalization? Weed Sci 54(2):282-290.
27. Moles AT, Gruber MAM, Bonser SP (2008) A new framework for predicting invasive plant species. J Ecol 96(1):13-17.
28. Zuppinger-Dingley D, et al. (2011) In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks. Ecosphere 2(5):54.
29. Lodge DM(1993) Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8(4):133-137.
30. van Wilgen NJ, Richardson DM (2011) Is phylogenetic relatedness to native species important for the establishment of reptiles introduced to California and Florida? Divers Distrib 17(1):172-181.
31. Harvey KJ, Nipperess DA, Britton DR, Hughes L (2012) Australian family ties: Does a lack of relatives help invasive plants escape natural enemies? Biol Invasions 14(11): 2423-2434.
32. Ricciardi A, Mottiar M (2006) Does Darwin's naturalization hypothesis explain fish invasions? Biol Invasions 8(6):1403-1407.
33. Cadotte MW, et al. (2010) Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California. Divers Distrib 16(6): 892-901.
34. Griffiths ME, Lawes MJ (2006) Biogeographic, environmental, and phylogenetic influences on reproductive traits in subtropical forest trees, South Africa. Ecography 29(4):614-622.
35. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125(1):1-15.
36. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The Comparative Methods in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ Press, New York), p 239.
37. Ives AR, Midford PE, Garland T, Jr. (2007) Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst Biol 56(2):252-270.
38. Mitchell CE, et al. (2006) Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9(6):726-740.
39. Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, London), p 490.
40. Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Wiley, New York).
41. Daehler CC (2001) Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am Nat 158(3): 324-330.
42. Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A review and metaanalysis. Biol Invasions 8(7):1535-1545.
43. Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95(3):361-373.
44. Duncan RP, Williams PA (2002) Ecology: Darwin's naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature 417(6889):608-609.
45. Agrawal AA, et al. (2005) Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86(11):2979-2989.
46. Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(15):5841-5845.
47. Schaefer H, Hardy OJ, Silva L, Barraclough TG, Savolainen V (2011) Testing Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol Lett 14(4):389-396.
48. Mack RN (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: Emergent and emerging approaches. Biol Conserv 78(1-2):107-121.
49. Lockwood J, Simberloff D, McKinney M, Von Holle B (2001) How many, and which, plants will invade natural areas? Biol Invasions 3(1):1-8.
50. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7(9):781-784.
51. Lambdon PW, Hulme PE (2006) How strongly do interactions with closely-related native species influence plant invasions? Darwin's naturalization hypothesis assessed on Mediterranean islands. J Biogeogr 33(6):1116-1125.
52. Lambdon PW (2008) Is invasiveness a legacy of evolution? Phylogenetic patterns in the alien flora of Mediterranean islands. J Ecol 96(1):46-57.
53. Ricotta C, Godefroid S, Rocchini D (2010) Invasiveness of alien plants in Brussels is related to their phylogenetic similarity to native species. Divers Distrib 16(4):655-662.
54. Tingley R, Phillips BL, Shine R (2011) Establishment success of introduced amphibians increases in the presence of congeneric species. Am Nat 177(3):382-388.
55. Ferreira RB, Beard KH, Peterson SL, Poessel SA, Callahan CM (2012) Establishment of introduced reptiles increases with the presence and richness of native congeners. Amphib-reptil 33(3-4):387-392.
56. Diez JM, Sullivan JJ, Hulme PE, Edwards G, Duncan RP (2008) Darwin's naturalization conundrum: Dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol Lett 11(7): 674-681.
57. Thuiller W, et al. (2010) Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: A quest for evidence. Divers Distrib 16(3):461-475.
58. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475-505.
59. Hill S, Kotanen P (2010) Phylogenetically structured damage to Asteraceae: Susceptibility of native and exotic species to foliar herbivores. Biol Invasions 12(9): 3333-3342.
60. Hill SB, Kotanen PM (2009) Evidence that phylogenetically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory. Oecologia 161(3):581-590.
61. Carboni M, et al. (2013) Darwin's naturalization hypothesis: scale matters in coastal plant communities. Ecography 36(5):560-568.
62. Davies KF, Cavender-Bares J, Deacon N (2011) Native communities determine the identity of exotic invaders even at scales at which communities are unsaturated. Divers Distrib 17(1):35-42.
63. Grandcolas P (1998) Phylogenetic analysis and the study of community structure. Oikos 82(2):397-400.
64. Henning W (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics (Univ of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL).
65. Hillis DM, Pollock DD, McGuire JA, Zwickl DJ (2003) Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst Biol 52(1):124-126.
66. Axelrod DI (1977) Terrestrial Vegetation of California, eds Barbour M, Major J (Wiley, New York), pp 139-194.
67. Rabeler RK (1993) California flora. Science 262(5131):261.
68. Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Kalin Arroyo M, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol Evol 11(9):362-366.
69. Sauquet H, et al. (2009) Contrasted patterns of hyperdiversification in Mediterranean hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(1):221-225.
70. Greuter W (1991) Botanical diversity, endemism, rarity, and extinction in the mediterranean area: An analysis based on the published volumes of med-checklist. Botanika Chronika 10:63-79.
71. Sala OE, et al. (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770-1774.
72. Seabloom EW, et al. (2006) Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled plant species in California. Ecol Appl 16(4):1338-1350.
73. Underwood EC, Viers JH, Klausmeyer KR, Cox RL, Shaw MR (2009) Threats and biodiversity in the mediterranean biome. Divers Distrib 15(2):188-197.
74. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772):853-858.
75. Quézel P (1985) Definition of the Mediterranean region and the origin of its flora. Plant Conservation in the Mediterranean Area, ed Gómez-Campo C (Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Netherlands), pp 9-24.
76. Médail F, Quezél P (1999) Biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean basin: Setting global conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 13(6):1510-1513.
77. Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO (2009) Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol Ecol 18(4):572-592.
78. Cadotte MW, Hamilton MA, Murray BR (2009) Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales. Divers Distrib 15(3):481-488.
79. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12(7):693-715.
80. Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N, Hidalgo O, Vilatersana R, Garnatje T (2006) The Cardueae (Compositae) revisited: Insights from its, trnL-TrnF, and matK nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Mo Bot Gard 93(1):150-171.
81. Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N (2007) Cardueae. Flowering Plants, Eudicots, Asterales, The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, eds Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C (Springer, Berlin), pp 123-147.
82. Nabhan AR, Sarkar IN (2012) The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: A review of two decades of controversy. Brief Bioinform 13(1):122-134.
83. Susanna A, et al. (2011) Lessons from Plectocephalus (Compositae, Cardueae-Centaureinae): ITS disorientation in annuals and Beringian dispersal as revealed by molecular analyses. Ann Bot (Lond) 108(2):263-277.
84. Cal-IPC (2006) California Invasive Plant Inventory (California Invasive Plant Council, Berkeley, CA).
85. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24(18): 2098-2100.
86. Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: An example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156(2):145-155.
87. Baldwin BG, et al., eds (2012) The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California (Univ of California Press, Berkeley), 2nd Ed.
88. Muth NZ, Pigliucci M (2006) Traits of invasives reconsidered: Phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. Am J Bot 93(2):188-196.
89. Bell CD, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2010) The age and diversification of the angiosperms rerevisited. Am J Bot 97(8):1296-1303.
90. Rezende EL, Diniz-Filho JAF (2011) Phylogenetic Analyses: Comparing Species to Infer Adaptations and Physiological Mechanisms. Comprehensive Physiology (Wiley, New York).
91. Diez JM, et al. (2009) Learning from failures: Testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. Ecol Lett 12(11):1174-1183.
92. Escobedo VM, Aranda JE, Castro SA (2011) Hipótesis de naturalización de Darwin evaluada en la flora exótica de Chile continental. Rev Chil Hist Nat 84:543-552.
93. Umbach KW (1998) A Statistical Tour of California's Great Central Valley (California Research Bureau, Sacramento, CA).
94. WilliamsonM, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77(6):1661-1666.
95. Panero JL, Funk VA (2008) The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: Major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47(2): 757-782.
96. Daehler CC (1998) The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol Conserv 84(2):167-180.
97. Pysek P (1998) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82(2):282-294.
98. Funk VA, et al. (2005) Everywhere but Antarctica: Using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 55:343-374.
99. Panero JL, Funk VA (2002) Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proc Biol Soc Wash 115(4):909-922.
100. Susanna A, Garnatje T, Garcia-Jacas N, Vilatersana R (2002) On the correct subtribal placement of the genera Syreitschikovia and Nikitinia (Asteraceae, Cardueae): Carduinae or Centaureinae? Bot J Linn Soc 140(3):313-319.
101. Garcia-Jacas N, Garnatje T, Susanna A, Vilatersana R (2002) Tribal and subtribal delimitation and phylogeny of the Cardueae (Asteraceae): A combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 22(1):51-64.
102. Kelch DG, Baldwin BG (2003) Phylogeny and ecological radiation of New World thistles (Cirsium, Cardueae-Compositae) based on ITS and ETS rDNA sequence data. Mol Ecol 12(1):141-151.
103. Potter D, et al. (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst Evol 266(1-2):5-43.
104. Baldwin BG, et al. (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82(2):247-277.
105. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17(5):1105-1109.
106. Hilu K, Liang H (1997) The matK gene: Sequence variation and application in plant systematics. Am J Bot 84(6):830.
107. Johnson LA, Soltis DE (1995) Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82(2):149-175.
108. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16(8): 1114-1116.
109. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0b10 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA).
110. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTALX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25(24):4876-4882.
111. Tamura K, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(10):2731-2739.
112. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD dissertation (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX).
113. Yang Z (1996) Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J Mol Evol 42(5):587-596.
114. Sikes DS, Lewis P (2001) PAUPRat: PAUP Implementation of the Parsimony Ratchet (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Univ of Connecticut, Storrs, CT).
115. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17(8):754-755.
116. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25(7): 1253-1256.
117. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna).
118. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the knight's tour. Oecologia 129(2):281-291.