Darwin's naturalization hypothesis: Scale matters in coastal plant communities

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 560-568

  Carboni, Marta ^a,b   Münkemüller, Tamara ^a   Gallien, Laure ^a   Lavergne, Sébastien ^a   Acosta, Alicia ^a   Thuiller, Wilfried ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED LAND; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; NATIVE SPECIES; NATURALIZATION; NICHE OVERLAP; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT COMMUNITY; RELATEDNESS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 84876789519     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07479.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abouheif E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 895-909.
2. Acosta A. et al. 2008. Patterns of native and alien plant species occurrence on coastal dunes in central Italy. - In: Tokarska-Guzik B. et al. (eds), Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. Backhuys Publishers, pp. 235-248.
3. Acosta A. et al. 2009. Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes? Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 1087-1098.
4. Blomberg S. P. and Garland T. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 899-910.
5. Cadotte M. W. et al. 2009. Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales. Divers. Distrib. 15: 481-488.
6. Carboni M. et al. 2010. Disentangling the relative effects of environmental versus human factors on the abundance of native and alien plant species in Mediterranean sandy shores. Divers. Distrib. 16: 537-546.
7. Carboni M. et al. 2011. Dealing with scarce data to understand how environmental gradients and propagule pressure shape fine-scale alien distribution patterns on coastal dunes. J. Veg. Sci. 22: 751-765.
8. Catford J. A. and Downes B. J. 2010. Using multi-scale species distribution data to infer drivers of biological invasion in riparian wetlands. Divers. Distrib. 16: 20-32.
9. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87: S109-S122.
10. Celesti-Grapow L. et al. 2009. Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosystems 143: 386-430.
11. Chaw S. M. et al. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 56-68.
12. Chytrý M. et al. 2009. European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Divers. Distrib. 15: 98-107.
13. Daehler C. C. 2001. Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am. Nat. 158: 324-330.
14. Darwin C. 1859. The origin of species. - John Murray.
15. Davies K. F. et al. 2011. Native communities determine the identity of exotic invaders even at scales at which communities are unsaturated. Divers. Distrib. 17: 35-42.
16. Davies T. J. and Buckley L. B. 2011. Phylogenetic diversity as a window into the evolutionary and biogeographic histories of present-day richness gradients for mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366: 2414-2425.
17. Diez J. M. et al. 2008. Darwin's naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol. Lett. 11: 674-681.
18. Diez J. M. et al. 2009. Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1174-1183.
19. Duncan R. P. and Williams P. A. 2002. Ecology - Darwin's naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature 417: 608-609.
20. Elton C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. - Methuen.
21. Frohlich M. W. and Chase M. W. 2007. After a dozen years of progress the origin of angiosperms is still a great mystery. Nature 450: 1184-1189.
22. Gotelli N. J. 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606-2621.
23. Hadfield J. D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33: 1-22.
24. Haibe-Kains B. et al. 2008. A comparative study of survival models for breast cancer prognostication on microarray data: does a single gene beat them all? Bioinformatics 24: 2200-2208.
25. Hanan E. J. and Ross M. S. 2010. Across-scale patterning of plant-soil-water interactions surrounding tree islands in southern Everglades landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 25: 463-476.
26. Hardy O. J. 2008. Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community. J. Ecol. 96: 914-926.
27. Huston M. A. 1999. Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86: 393-401.
28. Jiang L. et al. 2010. An experimental test of Darwin's natural ization hypothesis. Am. Nat. 175: 415-423.
29. Jones C. C. et al. 2010. Combining local- and large-scale models to predict the distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol. Appl. 20: 311-326.
30. Kembel S. W. et al. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26: 1463-1464.
31. Kraft N. J. B. et al. 2007. Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 170: 271-283.
32. Lambdon P. W. and Hulme P. E. 2006. How strongly do inter actions with closely-related native species influence plant invasions? Darwin's naturalization hypothesis assessed on Mediterranean islands. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1116-1125.
33. Marco A. et al. 2010. From the backyard to the backcountry: how ecological and biological traits explain the escape of garden plants into Mediterranean old fields. Biol. Invasions 12: 761-779.
34. Pavoine S. and Bonsall M. B. 2011. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. 86: 792-812.
35. Pillar V. D. and Duarte L. D. S. 2010. A framework for meta community analysis of phylogenetic structure. Ecol. Lett. 13: 587-596.
36. Proches S. et al. 2008. Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 5-10.
37. Pyšek P. et al. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143.
38. Qian H. and Kissling W. D. 2010. Spatial scale and cross-taxon congruence of terrestrial vertebrate and vascular plant species richness in China. Ecology 91: 1172-1183.
39. Ricciardi A. and Atkinson S. K. 2004. Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 7: 781-784.
40. Richardson D. M. and Pysek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 30: 409-431.
41. Ricotta C. et al. 2010. Invasiveness of alien plants in Brussels is related to their phylogenetic similarity to native species. Divers. Distrib. 16: 655-662.
42. Rocchini D. et al. 2010. Spectral variation versus species beta-diversity at different spatial scales: a test in African highland savannas. J. Environ. Monit. 12: 825-831.
43. Schaefer H. et al. 2011. Testing Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol. Lett. 14: 389-396.
44. Schoener T. W. 1970. Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51: 408-418.
45. Stachowicz J. J. and Tilman D. 2005. Species invasions and the relationships between species diversity, community saturation, and ecosystem functioning. - In: Sax D. F. et al. (eds), Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and bio geography. Sinauer, pp. 41-64.
46. Stohlgren T. J. et al. 1997. Multiscale sampling of plant diversity: effects of minimum mapping unit size. Ecol. Appl. 7: 1064-1074.
47. Stohlgren T. J. et al. 2002. Assessing vulnerability to invasion by nonnative plant species at multiple spatial scales. Environ. Manage. 29: 566-577.
48. Strauss S. Y. et al. 2006. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 5841-5845.
49. Swenson N. G. et al. 2006. The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87: 2418-2424.
50. Thuiller W. et al. 2010. Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16: 461-475.
51. Vamosi S. M. et al. 2009. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 18: 572-592.
52. van Wilgen N. J. and Richardson D. M. 2011. Is phylogenetic relatedness to native species important for the establishment of reptiles introduced to California and Florida? Divers. Distrib. 17: 172-181.
53. Webb C. O. et al. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 2098-2100.
54. Westoby M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199: 213-227.
55. Wikstrom N. et al. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: cali brating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 2211-2220.
56. Willis C. G. et al. 2010. Phylogenetic community structure in Minnesota oak savanna is influenced by spatial extent and environmental variation. Ecography 33: 565-577.
57. Willis K. J. and Whittaker R. J. 2002. Ecology - species diversity - scale matters. Science 295: 1245-1248.
58. Winter M. et al. 2009. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 21721-21725.