Research on the use of technology in TESOL: Analysis of interaction sequences in computer-assisted language learning

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 753-757

  Chapelle, Carol A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007021260     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bland, S. K., Noblitt, J. S., Armington, S., & Gay, G. (1990). The naive lexical hypothesis: Evidence from computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 74, 440-450.
2. Chapelle, C. (1994). CALL activities: Are they all the same? System, 22, 33-45.
3. Chapelle, C. Jamieson, J., & Park, Y. (1996). Second language classroom research traditions: How does CALL fit? In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 33-53). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
4. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
5. Doughty, C. (1992). Computer applications in second language acquisition research: Design, description, and discovery. In M. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 127-154). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
6. Dunkel, P. (1991). The effectiveness research on computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 5-36). New York: Newbury House.
7. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (Eds.). (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
9. Hsu, J. (1994). Computer assisted language learning (CALL): The effect of ESL students' use of interactional modifications on listening comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.
10. Jamieson, J., & Chapelle, C. (1987). Working styles on computers as evidence of second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 37, 523-544.
11. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
12. Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
13. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
15. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
16. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
17. Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 285-331.
18. Rodriguez, J. (1998). Investigating CALL use. Unpublished manuscript, Iowa State University.
19. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
20. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
21. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
22. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
23. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.