Laser microbeam-induced DNA damage inhibits cell division in fertilized eggs and early embryos

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 20, 2013, Pages 3336-3344

  Wang, Zhong Wei ^a   Ma, Xue Shan ^a   Ma, Jun Yu ^a   Luo, Yi Bo ^a   Lin, Fei ^a   Wang, Zhen Bo ^a   Fan, Heng Yu ^b   Schatten, Heide ^c   Sun, Qing Yuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Blastomeres; DNA damage; Embryos; Laser micro beam; Zygotes

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BLASTOMA; CELL DIVISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FEMALE; LASER; LASER MICROBEAM; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYO; NONHUMAN; PRONUCLEUS; ZYGOTE;

BLASTOMERES; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYOS; LASER MICRO BEAM; ZYGOTES;

ANIMALS; BLASTOMERES; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINEAGE; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LASERS; MALE; MICE, INBRED ICR; MORULA; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; OOCYTES; OVUM; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84886771510     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.26327     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ummat A, Rechkoblit O, Jain R, Roy Choudhury J, Johnson RE, Silverstein TD, Buku A, Lone S, Prakash L, Prakash S, et al. Structural basis for cisplatin DNA damage tolerance by human polymerase φ during cancer chemotherapy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:628-32; PMID:22562137; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb. 2295
2. Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact 2006; 160:1-40; PMID:16430879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009
3. Meyer JN, Bess AS. Involvement of autophagy and mitochondrial dynamics in determining the fate and effects of irreparable mitochondrial DNA damage. Autophagy 2012; 8:1822-3; PMID:22929123; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.21741
4. Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1988; 35:95-125; PMID:3065826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6603(08) 60611-X
5. Marangos P, Carroll J. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr Biol 2012; 22:989-94; PMID:22578416; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2012.03.063
6. Carroll J, Marangos P. The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes. Front Genet 2013; 4:117; PMID:23805152; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013. 00117
7. Ma JY, Ou Yang YC, Wang ZW, Wang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Luo SM, Hou Y, Liu ZH, Schatten H, Sun QY. The effects of DNA double-strand breaks on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:1233-41; PMID:23518501; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.24311
8. Yuen WS, Merriman JA, O'Bryan MK, Jones KT. DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43875; PMID:22928046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0043875
9. Dar S, Grover SA, Moskovtsev SI, Swanson S, Baratz A, Librach CL. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in patients with a markedly high DNA fragmentation index (>50%). Fertil Steril 2013; 100:75-80; PMID:23562046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.011
10. Yukawa M, Oda S, Mitani H, Nagata M, Aoki F. Deficiency in the response to DNA double-strand breaks in mouse early preimplantation embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 358:578-84; PMID:17498656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. bbrc.2007.04.162
11. Mu XF, Jin XL, Farnham MM, Li Y, O'Neill C. DNA damage-sensing kinases mediate the mouse 2-cell embryo's response to genotoxic stress. Biol Reprod 2011; 85:524-35; PMID:21593482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.089334
12. Lukas C, Falck J, Bartkova J, Bartek J, Lukas J. Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:255-60; PMID:12598907; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb945
13. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, Lukas J, Jackson SP. ATM-and cell cycledependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:37-45; PMID:16327781; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1337
14. Bekker-Jensen S, Lukas C, Kitagawa R, Melander F, Kastan MB, Bartek J, Lukas J. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2006; 173:195-206; PMID:16618811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510130
15. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:905-16; PMID:10477747; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.905
16. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol 2000; 10:886-95; PMID:10959836; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00610-2
17. Kong X, Mohanty SK, Stephens J, Heale JT, Gomez-Godinez V, Shi LZ, Kim JS, Yokomori K, Berns MW. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:e68; PMID:19357094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221
18. Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K, Elledge SJ. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:10389-94; PMID:10973490; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 190030497
19. Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuåsen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J. The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 2001; 410:842-7; PMID:11298456; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35071124
20. Gawecka JE, Marh J, Ortega M, Yamauchi Y, Ward MA, Ward WS. Mouse zygotes respond to severe sperm DNA damage by delaying paternal DNA replication and embryonic development. PLoS One 2013; 8:e56385; PMID:23431372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056385
21. Barton TS, Robaire B, Hales BF. DNA damage recognition in the rat zygote following chronic paternal cyclophosphamide exposure. Toxicol Sci 2007; 100:495-503; PMID:17872895; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm242
22. Derijck AA, van der Heijden GW, Giele M, Philippens ME, van Bavel CC, de Boer P. gammaH2AX signalling during sperm chromatin remodelling in the mouse zygote. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:959-71; PMID:16837249; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.043
23. Xiao J, Liu Y, Li Z, Zhou Y, Lin H, Wu X, Chen M, Xiao W. Effects of the insemination of hydrogen peroxide-treated epididymal mouse spermatozoa on γH2AX repair and embryo development. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38742; PMID:22745678; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038742
24. Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, Roelen BA, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl 2006; 27:176-88; PMID:16304212; http://dx.doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.04152
25. Beli P, Lukashchuk N, Wagner SA, Weinert BT, Olsen JV, Baskcomb L, Mann M, Jackson SP, Choudhary C. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012; 46:212-25; PMID:22424773; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.026
26. Jacquet P. Sensitivity of germ cells and embryos to ionizing radiation. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2004; 18:106-14; PMID:15471212
27. Wang QL, Sun SC, Han J, Kwak YC, Kim NH, Cui XS. Doxorubicin induces early embryo apoptosis by inhibiting poly(ADP ribose) polymerase. In Vivo 2012; 26:827-34; PMID:22949597
28. Yamauchi H, Katayama K, Ueno M, Kanemitsu H, Nam C, Mikami T, Saito A, Ishida Y, Uetsuka K, Doi K, et al. Etoposide induces TRP53-dependent apoptosis and TRP53-independent cell cycle arrest in trophoblasts of the developing mouse placenta. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:813-22; PMID:19109225; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod.108.069419
29. Matsuzuka T, Ozawa M, Nakamura A, Ushitani A, Hirabayashi M, Kanai Y. Effects of heat stress on the redox status in the oviduct and early embryonic development in mice. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51:281-7; PMID:15699582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.16089
30. Borhani N, Rajaei F, Salehi Z, Javadi A. Analysis of DNA fragmentation in mouse embryos exposed to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med 2011; 30:246-52; PMID:22047462; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/ 15368 378.2011.589556
31. Luo Q, Yang J, Zeng QL, Zhu XM, Qian YL, Huang HF. 50-Hertz electromagnetic fields induce gammaH2AX foci formation in mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod 2006; 75:673-80; PMID:16855210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.052241
32. Streffer C. Chromosomal damage in preimplantation mouse embryos and its development through the cell cycle. Mutat Res 1993; 299:313-5; PMID:7683099; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(93)90108-P
33. Tarkowski AK. Experiments on the development of isolated blastomers of mouse eggs. Nature 1959; 184:1286-7; PMID:13836947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 1841286a0
34. Van de Velde H, Cauffman G, Tournaye H, Devroey P, Liebaers I. The four blastomeres of a 4-cell stage human embryo are able to develop individually into blastocysts with inner cell mass and trophectoderm. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1742-7; PMID:18503052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den190
35. Moore NW, Adams CE, Rowson LE. Developmental potential of single blastomeres of the rabbit egg. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 17:527-31; PMID:5715682; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0170527
36. Willadsen SM. The development capacity of blastomeres from 4-and 8-cell sheep embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1981; 65:165-72; PMID:6895911
37. Chi HJ, Koo JJ, Choi SY, Jeong HJ, Roh SI. Fragmentation of embryos is associated with both necrosis and apoptosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:187-92; PMID:21550043; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.020
38. Toyoshima M. Analysis of p53 dependent damage response in sperm-irradiated mouse embryos. J Radiat Res 2009; 50:11-7; PMID:19218778; http://dx.doi.org/10.1269/jrr.08099
39. Cryns V, Yuan J. Proteases to die for. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1551-70; PMID:9620844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.11.1551
40. Kamjoo M, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Apoptosis in the preimplantation mouse embryo: effect of strain difference and in vitro culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 61:67-77; PMID:11774377; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1132
41. Hao Y, Lai L, Mao J, Im GS, Bonk A, Prather RS. Apoptosis and in vitro development of preimplantation porcine embryos derived in vitro or by nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:501-7; PMID:12700186; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod.103.016170
42. Weil M, Jacobson MD, Coles HS, Davies TJ, Gardner RL, Raff KD, Raff MC. Constitutive expression of the machinery for programmed cell death. J Cell Biol 1996; 133:1053-9; PMID:8655578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.5.1053