Overcoming the tensions and challenges of technology integration: How can we best support our teachers?

Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 136-156

  Boling, Erica C ^a   Beatty, Jeanine ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886769859     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 292-301. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x
2. st century teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 825-840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00662.x
3. Aworuwa, B., Worrell, P., & Smaldino, S. (2006). A reflection on partners and projects. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50(3), 38-45.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033295X.84.2.191
5. Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(3), 195-199. doi:10.1016/00057916(82)90004-0
6. Boling, E. C. (2008). Learning from teacher's conceptions of technology integration: What do blogs, instant messages, and 3D chat rooms have to do with it? Research in the Teaching of English, 43(1), 74-100.
7. st century. Change, 38(5), 18-24. doi:10.3200/CHNG.38.5.18-24
8. Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47-60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Davis, N., Preston, C., & Sahin, I. (2009). Training teachers to use new technologies impacts multiple ecologies: Evidence form a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 861-878. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00875.x
11. Dickey, M. (2008). Integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a Web-based educational technology course for P-12 teacher education. Computers & Education, 51, 506-518. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.017
12. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 342-361.
13. Duran, M., Fossum, P., & Luera, G. (2007). Technology and pedagogical renewal: Conceptualizing technology integration into teacher preparation. Computers in the Schools, 23, 31-54. doi:10.1300/J025v23n03_03
14. Dutt-Doner, K., Allen, S., & Corcoran, D. (2006). Transforming student learning by preparing the next generation of teachers for type II technology integration. Computers in the Schools, 22(3), 63-75. doi:10.1300/J025v22n03_06
15. Gavelek, J. R., & Raphael, T. E. (1996). Changing talk about text: New roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73, 182-192.
16. Goodson, I. F., & Mangan, J. M. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21, 613-628. doi:10.1080/0141192950210505
17. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2003). Pedagogical strategies for using ICT to support subject teacher and learning: An analysis across 15 case studies. Research Report No. 03/1, University of Cambridge, England.
18. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 155-192. doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961
19. Holland, P. (2001). Professional development in technology: Catalyst for school reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 245-267.
20. Hughes, J. E., & Ooms, A. (2004). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Preparing urban teachers to integrate technology to transform student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 397-411.
21. Kong, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). The road to participation: The evolution of a literary community in the intermediate grade classroom of linguistically diverse learners (CIERA Report #3-017). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. Retrieved December 30, 2006, from http://www.ciera.org/library/reports/inquiry-3/3-017/3-017p.pdf
22. Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921
23. Mills, S., & Tincher, R. (2003). Be the technology: A developmental model for evaluating technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 382-401.
24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.
25. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79, 576-600. doi:10.3102/0034654308326083
26. Mulqueen, W. (2001). Technology in the classroom: Lessons learned through professional development. Education, 122, 248-256.
27. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
28. Parr, J. (1999). Extending educational computing: A case of extensive teacher development and support. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 280-291.
29. st Century Skills.
30. Plair, S. K. (2008). Revamping professional development for technology integration and fluency. Clearing House (Menasha, Wis.), 82(2), 70-74. doi:10.3200/TCHS.82.2.70-74
31. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
32. Reinking, D., Labbo, L., & McKenna, M. (2000). From assimilation to accommodation: A developmental framework for integrating digital technologies into literacy research and instruction. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 110-122. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00108
33. Ronau, R. N., Rakes, C. R., Niess, M. L., Wagener, L., Pugalee, D., & Browning, C. ... Mathews S. M., (2010). New directions in the research of technology-enhanced education. In J. Yamamoto, C. Penny, J. Leight, & S. Winterton (Eds.), Technology leadership in teacher education: Integrated solutions and experiences (pp. 263-297). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
34. Ropp, M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in presevice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 402-424.
35. Rosaen, C., Hobson, S., & Khan, G. (2003). Making connections: Collaborative approaches to preparing today's and tomorrow's teachers to use technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 281-306.
36. Ross, T. W., & Wissman, J. (2001). Redesigning undergraduate technology instruction: One college of education's experience. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 231-244.
37. Seels, B., Campbell, S., & Talsma, V. (2003). Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learners. ETR&D, 51(1), 91-104. doi:10.1007/BF02504520
38. Shapka, J. D., & Ferrari, M. (2003). Computerrelated attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 319-334. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00059-6
39. Sheingold, K. (1990). Restructuring for learning with technology. The potential for synergy. In K. Sheingold & M. Tacher (Eds), Restructuring for learning with technology (pp. 9-27). New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education: Center for Technology in Education.
40. Smolin, L. I., & Lawless, K. A. (2003). Becoming literate in the technological and tools for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 570-578.
41. Straub, E. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 625-649. doi:10.3102/0034654308325896
42. Torkzadeh, G., & Koufteros, X. (2002). Effects on training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-494. doi:10.1016/S07475632(02)00010-9
43. Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805-814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805
44. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482-515. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00170