Integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a Web-based educational technology course for P-12 teacher education

Computers and Education

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 506-518

  Dickey, Michele D ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive apprenticeship; Distance education; Educational technology; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; CURRICULA; EDUCATION COMPUTING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; WEB SERVICES;

COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; TEACHER EDUCATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 43849108575     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Belland J.C. Developing connoisseurship in educational technology. In: Hlynka D., and Belland J.C. (Eds). Paradigms regained: The uses of illuminative, semiotic and post-modern criticism as modes of inquiry in educational technology (1991), Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 23-35
2. In: Bransford J., Brown A., and Cocking R. (Eds). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (1999), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Brown A.L. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in instructional psychology (1978), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 77-165
4. Brown J.S., Collins A., and Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. In: McLellan H. (Ed). Situated learning perspectives (1996), Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 19-44
5. Collins A. Cognitive apprenticeship. In: Sawyer R.K. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2006), Cambridge University Press, NY
6. Collins A., Brown J.S., and Newman S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick L.B. (Ed). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 453-494
7. Daviault, C. & Coelho, M. (2003). Forum: A new approach to the production of educational content. Presentation at SIGGRAPH: International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Educators program from the 30th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. San Diego, CA, July 27-31.
8. Dede, C. (2000). Implications of Emerging Technologies for States' Education Policies. Paper written for the January, 2000 School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.
9. Duffy T.M., and Cunningham D.J. Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1996), Macmillan, New York 170-198
10. Enkenberg J. Instructional design and emerging models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior 17 (2001) 495-506
11. Erickson Frederick. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M.C. (Ed). Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. (1986), MacMillan Press, New York 119-161
12. Fine M. Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and others in qualitative research. In: Denizen N.K., and Lincoln Y. (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 170-182
13. Glaser B., and Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1967), Aldine, New York
14. Hannafin M.J., Land S., and Oliver K. Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory Vol. 2 (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 115-140
15. Hendricks C.C. Teaching causal reasoning through cognitive apprenticeship: What are results from situated learning?. The Journal of Educational Research 94 5 (2001) 302-311
16. Järvelä S. The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technology rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction. Learning and Instruction 5 (1995) 237-259
17. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Cooperation and the use of technology. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1996), Macmillan, New York 1017-1044
18. Jonassen D.H. Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models Vol. 2 (1999), Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 215-239
19. Lewis, L., Snow, E., Farris, K., & Levin, D. (1999). Distance Education at Postsecondary Education Institutions: 1997-98. NCES 2000013. Retrieved July 2, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000013.pdf.
20. Lincoln Y., and Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
21. Liu M. A study of engaging high-school students as multimedia designers in a cognitive apprenticeship-style learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior 14 3 (1998) 387-415
22. Liu M., and Hsiao Y. Middle school students as multimedia designers: A project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13 4 (2002) 311-337
23. Liu M., and Pedersen S. Hypermedia design and elementary school students. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9 2 (1998) 155-182
24. Lowther D., and Clark F. Impact of the cognitive apprenticeship model on preparing pre-service teachers to effectively plan for the use of technology in instruction. In: Crawford C., et al. (Ed). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2002 (2002), AACE, Chesapeake, VA 1276-1280
25. Means, B. (2000). Accountability in preparing teachers to use technology. Paper written for the January, 2000 School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.
26. Merriam S.B. Qualitative research and case study applications in education (1998), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
27. National Center for Education Statistics (2002). A Profile of Participation in Distance Education:1999-2000 Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports. US Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 2003-154. Retrieved June 20, 2004 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003154.pdf.
28. Pahl, C. (2002). An evaluation of scaffolding for virtual interactive tutorials. Presented at E-Learn 2002, Montreal, Canada.
29. Peshkin A. In search of subjectivity-one's own. Educational Researcher 17 7 (1988) 17-22
30. Saarenkunnas M., Järvelä S., Häkkinen P., Kuure L., Taalas P., and Kunelius E. NINTER- Networked Interaction: Theory-based cases in teaching and learning. Learning Environments Research 3 (2000) 35-50
31. Schrader P.G., Leu D.J., Kinzer C.K., Ataya R., Teale W.H., Labbo L.D., et al. Using Internet delivered video cases, to support pre-service teachers' understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition 31 (2003) 317-340
32. Shabo A., Guzdial M., and Stasko J. An apprenticeship-based multimedia courseware for computer graphics studies provided on the World Wide Web. Computers and Education 29 2/3 (1997) 103-116
33. Stockhausen L.J., and Zimitat C. New learning: Re-apprenticing the learner. Education Media International 39 3/4 (2002) 331-338
34. Winn W. Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review 14 3 (2002) 331-351